Effectiveness of A Computer-Assisted Asthma Management Program on Physician Adherence to Guidelines

References

• Global Initiative for Asthma. Global strategy for asthma management and prevention 2006. Available at: http://www.ginasthma.com . Accessed March 3, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes PJ. The size of the problems of managing asthma. Respir Med 2004; 98(Suppl B):S4–S8.
   Google Scholar
• Rabe K, Vermeire P, Soriano J, Maier WC. Clinical management of asthma in 1999: the Asthma Insights and Reality in Europe (AIRE) study. Eur Respir J 2000; 16:802–807.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes PJ. Asthma guidelines: recommendation versus reality. Respir Med 2004; 98(Supple A):S1–S7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Crim C. Clinical practice guidelines vs. actual clinical practice. Chest 2000; 118:S62–S64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legorreta AP, Christian-Herman J, O’Connor RD, Hasan MM, Evans R, Leung KM. Compliance with national asthma management guidelines and specialty care. Arch Intern Med 1998; 158:457–464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Marco R, Cazzoletti L, Cerveri I, Corsico A, Bugiani M, Accordini S, Are the asthma guideline goals achieved in daily practice? A population-based study on treatment adequacy and the control of asthma. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2005; 138:225–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zainudin BM, Lai CK, Soriano JB, Jia-Horng W, De Guia TS. Asthma Insights and Reality in Asia-Pacific (AIRIAP) Steering Committee. Asthma control in adults in Asia-Pacific. Respirology 2005; 10:579–586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bero LA, Grilli R, Grimshaw JM, Harvey E, Oxman AD, Thomson MA. Closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings. The Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care Review Group. BMJ 1998; 317:465–468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiffman RN, Liaw Y, Brandt CA, Corb GJ. Computer-based guideline implementation systems: a systematic review of functionality and effectiveness. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1999; 6:104–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimshaw J, Freemantle N, Wallace S, Russell I, Hurwitz B, Watt I, Long A, Sheldon T. Developing and implementing clinical practice guidelines. Qual Health Care 1995; 4:55–64.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hunt DL, Haynes RB, Hanna SE, Smith K. Effects of computerbased clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes. JAMA 1998; 280:1339–1346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan B. Evaluating informatics applications-clinical decision support systems literature review. Int J Med Inf 2001; 64:15–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimshaw J, Freemantle N, Wallace S, Russell I, Hurwitz B, Watt I, Long A, Sheldon T. Developing and implementing clinical practice guidelines. Qual Health Care 1995; 4:55–64.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baron RJ, Fabens EL, Schiffman M, Wolf E. Electronic health records: just around the corner? Or over the cliff? Ann Intern Med 2005; 143:222–226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention. NHLBI/WHO workshop report. Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Health, 2002. NIH publication no. 95–3659.
   Google Scholar
• Korean Society of Allergology. National guideline for the management of asthma. J Asthma Allergy Clin Immunol 1998; 18:338–390 [Korean].
   Google Scholar
• Kwon S. Payment system reform for health care providers in Korea. Health Policy Plan 2003; 18;84–92.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• World Health Organization. International classification of diseases. Avai- lable at: http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/en . Accessed April 30, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Grimshaw JM, Russell IT. Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations. Lancet 1993; 342:1317–1322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimshaw JM, Thomas RE, MacLennan G, Fraser C, Ramsay CR, Vale L, Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technol Assess 2004; 8:1–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles MP, Grimshaw JM. Selecting, presenting and delivering clinical guidelines: are there any “magic bullets”? Med J Aust 2004; 180:S52–S54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobach DF, Hammond WE. Computerized decision support based on a clinical practice guideline improves compliance with care standards. Am J Med 1997; 102:89–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garg AX, Adhikari NK, McDonald H, Rosas-Arellano MP, Devereaux PJ, Beyene J, Sam J, Haynes RB. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA 2005; 293:1223–1228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCowan C, Neville RG, Ricketts IW, Warner FC, Hoskins G, Thomas GE. Lessons from a randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate computer decision support software to improve the management of asthma. Med Inform Internet Med 2001; 26:191–201.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eccles M, McColl E, Steen N, Rousseau N, Grimshaw J, Parkin D, Purves I. Effect of computerized evidence based guidelines on management of asthma and angina in adults in primary care: cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2002; 325:941–947.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bousquet J, Clark TJ, Hurd S, Khaltaev N, Lenfant C, O’Byrne P, Sheffer A. GINA guidelines on asthma and beyond. Allergy 2007; 62:102–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar