References
- Langaker K E, Osmundsen K, Bredesen J E, Lunde P NM. Double-blind comparative trial of Nuelin Depot and Theo-Dur with adjusted dosage in asthmatic adults. Allergy 1981; 36: 501–505
- Talseth T, Boye N P, Bredesen J E, Kornstad S. A comparison of the plasma profiles of two slow-release theophylline preparations (Nuelin Depot and Theo-Dur) in healthy volunteers. Ann Allergy 1981; 46: 279–280
- Cope A S, Purkiss R, Edwards C. Plasma theophylline concentrations in healthy volunteers after multiple dosing of two sustained-release preparations taken after food. Biopharm Drug Disposit 1984; 5: 297–301
- Harkaway P S, Conlon P F, Hirsh J D, Allen W T. Comparison of two sustained-release theophylline preparations in adult patients with obstructive airways disease. J Clin Pharmacol 1985; 25: 444–447
- Kehe C R, Elkholm B P, Chang S F, Wick K A, Rhode K A, Welscher T M, Harrison L I. Comparative absorption of theophylline from Theolair-SR and two reference theophylline preparations following multiple doses with food. Curr Therap Res 1986; 39: 3–7
- Domson J F, Hein E W, Sheen A, Sly R M. Comparison of Theolair-SR and Theo-Dur tablets. Ann Allergy 1979; 43: 220–222
- Harrison L I. Letter to the editor. Ann Allergy 1981; 47: 116
- Weinberger M, Hendeles L, Wong L, Vaughan L. Relationship of formulation and dosing interval to fluctuation of serum theophylline concentration in children with chronic asthma. J Pediatr 1981; 99: 145–152
- Hendeles L, Weinberger M. Selection of a slow-release theophylline product. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1986; 78: 743–751