2,076
Views
39
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Does the organizational structure of health care systems influence care-seeking decisions? A qualitative analysis of Danish cancer patients' reflections on care-seeking

, , , &
Pages 144-149 | Received 21 Aug 2010, Accepted 02 May 2011, Published online: 23 Aug 2011

References

  • Storm HH, Engholm G, Hakulinen T, Tryggvadottir L, Klint A, Gislum M, . Survival of patients diagnosed with cancer in the Nordic countries up to 1999–2003 followed to the end of 2006: A critical overview of the results. Acta Oncol 2010;49:532–44.
  • Olesen F, Hansen RP, Vedsted P. Delay in diagnosis: The experience in Denmark. Br J Cancer 2009;101:S5–S8.
  • Coleman M, Forman D, Bryant H, Butler J, Rachet B, Maringe C, . Cancer survival in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and the UK, 1995–2007 (the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership): An analysis of population-based cancer registry data. Lancet 2010;377:127–38.
  • Berrino F, Verdecchia A, Lutz JM, Lombardo C, Micheli A, Capocaccia R. Comparative cancer survival information in Europe. Eur J Cancer 2009;45:901–8.
  • Storm HH, Dickman PW, Engeland A, Haldorsen T, Hakulinen T. Do morphology and stage explain the inferior lung cancer survival in Denmark? Eur Respir J 1999;13:430–5.
  • Macleod U, Mitchell ED, Burgess C, Macdonald S, Ramirez AJ. Risk factors for delayed presentation and referral of symptomatic cancer: Evidence for common cancers. Br J Cancer 2009;101:S92–S101.
  • Hansen RP, Olesen F, Sorensen HT, Sokolowski I, Sondergaard J. Socioeconomic patient characteristics predict delay in cancer diagnosis: A Danish cohort study. BMC Health Serv Res 2008;8:49.
  • Tromp DM, Brouha XD, de L, Jr., Hordijk GJ, Winnubst JA. Psychological factors and patient delay in patients with head and neck cancer. Eur J Cancer 2004;40:1509–16.
  • Scott SE, Grunfeld EA, Auyeung V, McGurk M. Barriers and triggers to seeking help for potentially malignant oral symptoms: Implications for interventions. J Public Health Dent 2009;69:34–40.
  • Robb K, Stubbings S, Ramirez A, Macleod U, Austoker J, Waller J, . Public awareness of cancer in Britain: A population-based survey of adults. Br J Cancer 2009;101:S18–23.
  • Pappas G. Some implications for the study of the doctor– patient interaction: Power, structure, and agency in the works of Howard Waitzkin and Arthur Kleinman. Soc Sci Med 1990;30:199–204.
  • Strong PM. The ceremonial order of the clinic: Parents, doctors and medical bureaucracies. London, Boston and Henley: Routledge & Kegan Paul; 1979.
  • Shilling C. Culture, the “sick role” and the consumption of health. Br J Sociol 2002;53:621–38.
  • Freeman GK, Olesen F, Hjortdahl P. Continuity of care: An essential element of modern general practice? Fam Pract 2003;20:623–7.
  • Hjortdahl P, Laerum E. Continuity of care in general practice: Effect on patient satisfaction. BMJ 1992;304:1287–90.
  • Starfield B. Is primary care essential? Lancet 1994;344: 1129–33.
  • Emerson RM, Fretz RL, Shaw LL. Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chigaco Press; 1995.
  • Hammersley M, Atkinson P. Ethnography: Principles in practice. London: Tavistock Publications; 1983.
  • Ahmed A, Fincham JE. Physician office vs retail clinic: Patient preferences in care seeking for minor illnesses. Ann Fam Med 2010;8:117–23.
  • Vedsted P, Olesen F, Hollnagel H, Bro F, Kamper-Jørgensen F. Almen lægepraksis i Danmark [in Danish] [Danish General Practice]. 1st. København: Tidsskrift for Praktisk Lægegerning; 2005.
  • Hayward C, Lukes S. Nobody to shoot? Power, structure, and agency. A dialogue. Journal of Power 2008;1:5–20.
  • Willems DL. Balancing rationalities: Gatekeeping in healthcare. J Med Ethics 2001;27:25–9.
  • Grumbach K, Selby JV, Damberg C, Bindman AB, Quesenberry CJ, Truman A, . Resolving the gatekeeper conundrum: What patients value in primary care and referrals to specialists. JAMA 1999;282:261–6.
  • Nordgren L. The performativity of the service management discourse: “Value creating customers” in healthcare. J Health Organ Manag 2008;22:510–28.
  • Halm EA, Causino N, Blumenthal D. Is gatekeeping better than traditional care? A survey of physicians’ attitudes. JAMA 1997;278:1677–81.
  • Guthrie B, Wyke S. Personal continuity and access in UK general practice: A qualitative study of general practitioners’ and patients’ perceptions of when and how they matter. BMC Fam Pract 2006;7:11.
  • Hjortdahl P. General practice and continuity of care: Organizational aspects. Fam Pract 1989;6:292–8.
  • Levenstein JH, Mccracken EC, McWhinney IR, Stewart MA, Brown JB. The patient-centred clinical method, 1: A model for the doctor–patient interaction in family medicine. Fam Pract 1986;3:24–30.
  • Olesen F, Vedsted P. Family medicine should redefine its essential attributes: Affirmative position. Buetow S, Kenealy T. Ideological debates in family medicine. 1st. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers; 2007 13–23.
  • Turner D, Tarrant C, Windridge K, Bryan S, Boulton M, Freeman G, . Do patients value continuity of care in general practice? An investigation using stated preference discrete choice experiments. J Health Serv Res Policy 2007; 12:132–7.
  • Freeman G. Continuity of care in general practice: A review and critique. Fam Pract 1984;1:245–52.
  • Frederiksen HB, Kragstrup J, Dehlholm-Lambertsen B. Attachment in the doctor–patient relationship in general practice: A qualitative study. Scand J Prim Healthcare 2010;28:185–90.
  • Facione NC. Delay versus help seeking for breast cancer symptoms: A critical review of the literature on patient and provider delay. Soc Sci Med 1993;36:1521–34.
  • Stein HF. The role of some nonbiomedical parameters in clinical decision making: An ethnographic approach. Qual Health Res 1991;1:6–26.
  • Bourdieu P. The logic of practice. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1980.
  • Kvale S. The qualitative research interview: A phenomenological and a hermeneutical mode of understanding. J Phenomenological Psychology 1993;171–96.