575
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Presenting the improved possibility for staying well might be better than talking about change in risk: Use of the Non-Occurrence Probability Increase (NOPI)

, &
Pages 138-140 | Received 20 Dec 2012, Accepted 29 Apr 2013, Published online: 29 Jul 2013

References

  • Hvas L, Reventlow S, Jensen HL, Malterud K. Awareness of risk of osteoporosis may cause uncertainty and worry in menopausal women. Scand J Public Health 2005;33:203–7.
  • Reventlow S, Hvas AC, Tulinius C. “In really great danger ...”: The concept of risk in general practice. Scand J Prim Health Care 2001;12:71–5.
  • Akl EA, Oxman AD, Herrin J, Vist GE, Terrenato I, Sperati F, et al. Using alternative statistical formats for presenting risks and risk reductions. Intervention Review, the Cochrane Library, 2011. Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006776.pub2/abstract (accessed 23 August 2011).
  • Covey J. A meta-analysis of the effects of presenting treatment benefits in different formats. Med Decis Making 2007;27:638–54.
  • Tversky A, Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 1981;211:453–8.
  • Slovic P. Public perception of risk. J Environ Health 1997; 59:22–5.
  • Wilhelmsen L, Wedel H, Conroy R, Fitzgerald T. The Swedish SCORE chart for cardiovascular risk: Better possibilities for prevention of cardiovascular diseases. Lakartidningen 2004;101:1798–801 (in Swedish).
  • Sever PS, Dahlöf B, Poulter NR, Wedel H, Beevers G, Caulfield M, et al. ASCOT Investigators. Prevention of coronary and stroke events with atorvastatin in hypertensive patients who have average or lower-than-average cholesterol concentrations, in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial-Lipid Lowering Arm (ASCOT-LLA): A multicentre randomised controlled trial. Drugs 2004; 64(Suppl 2):43–60.
  • Halvorsen PA, Kristiansen IS, Aasland OG, Førde OH. Medical doctors’ perception of the “number needed to treat” (NNT): A survey of doctors’ recommendations for two therapies with different NNT. Scand J Prim Health Care 2003;21:162–6.
  • Gyrd-Hansen D, Halvorsen P, Nexøe J, Nielsen J, Støvring H, Kristiansen I. Joint and separate evaluation of risk reduction: Impact on sensitivity to risk reduction magnitude in the context of 4 different risk information formats. Med Decis Making 2011;31:E1–10. Epub 2010 Dec 20.
  • Hollnagel H. Explaining risk factors to the patient during general practice consultation. Scand J Prim Health Care 1999;17:3–5.
  • Godlee F. Editorial: Are we at risk of being at risk?BMJ 2010;341:c4766.
  • Korhonen P, Vesalainen R, Aarnio P, Kautiainen H, Järvenpää S, Kantola I. Assessment of cardiovascular risk in primary health care. Scand J Prim Health Care 2012;30: 101–6.
  • Akl EA, Oxman AD, Herrin J, Vist GE, Terrenato I, Sperati F, et al. Using alternative statistical formats for presenting risks and risk reductions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011;Issue 3.
  • O’Connor AM, Stacey D, Rovner D, Holmes-Rovner M, Tetroe J, Llewellyn-Thomas H, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009:8;CD001431.
  • Goodyear-Smith F, Arroll B, Chan L, Jackson R, Wells S, Kenealy T. Patients prefer pictures to numbers to express cardiovascular benefit from treatment. Ann Fam Med 2008; 6:213–17.