Heart rate variability and heat sensation during CT coronary angiography: Low-osmolar versus iso-osmolar contrast media

References

• Flohr TG, Ohnesorge BM. Imaging of the heart with computed tomography. Basic Res Cardiol 2008;103:161–73.
   Google Scholar
• Lawler LP, Pannu HK, Fishman EK. MDCT evaluation of the coronary arteries, 2004: how we do it – data acquisition, postprocessing, display, and interpretation. Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:1402–12.
   Google Scholar
• Pannu HK, Johnson PT, Fishman EK. 64 Slice multi-detector row cardiac CT. Emerg Radiol 2009;16:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Maruyama T, Takada M, Hasuike T, Yoshikawa A, Namimatsu E, Yoshizumi T. Radiation dose reduction and coronary assessability of prospective electrocardiogram-gated computed tomography coronary angiography: comparison with retrospective electrocardiogram-gated helical scan. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:1450–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol ED, Arcuri N, Rubens MB, Padley SP. Considerations when introducing a new cardiac MDCT service. Avoiding the pitfalls. Clin Radiol 2008;63:355–69.
   Google Scholar
• Leschka S, Wildermuth S, Boehm T, Desbiolles L, Husmann L, Plass A, . Noninvasive coronary angiography with 64-section CT: effect of average heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality. Radiology 2006;241:378–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leschka S, Scheffel H, Husmann L, Gamperli O, Marincek B, Kaufmann PA, . Effect of decrease in heart rate variability on the diagnostic accuracy of 64-MDCT coronary angiography. Am J Roentgenol 2008;190:1583–90.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson P. Chemotoxicity of contrast media and clinical adverse effects: a review. Invest Radiol 1985;20(1 Suppl):S84–91.
   Google Scholar
• Koeda T, Motegi I, Ichikawa T, Suzuki T, Kato M. Changes in hemodynamics due to the contrast medium during left ventriculography. Angiology 1987;38:825–32.
   Google Scholar
• Almen T. Contrast media: the relation of chemical structure, animal toxicity and adverse clinical effects. Am J Cardiol 1990;66:2F–8F.
   Google Scholar
• Hirshfeld JW Jr. Cardiovascular effects of iodinated contrast agents. Am J Cardiol 1990;66:9F–17F.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson P. Cardiovascular effects of contrast agents. Am J Cardiol 1989;64:2E–9E.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinnison ML, Powe NR, Steinberg EP. Results of randomized controlled trials of low-versus high-osmolality contrast media. Radiology 1989;170:381–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mancini GB, Bloomquist JN, Bhargava V, Stein JB, Lew W, Slutsky RA, . Hemodynamic and electrocardiographic effects in man of a new nonionic contrast agent (iohexol): advantages over standard ionic agents. Am J Cardiol 1983;51:1218–22.
   Google Scholar
• Bettmann MA, Bourdillon PD, Barry WH, Brush KA, Levin DC. Contrast agents for cardiac angiography: effects of a nonionic agent vs. a standard ionic agent. Radiology 1984;153:583–7.
   Google Scholar
• Flinck A, Selin K, Bjorneld L, Nossen JO. Iodixanol and iohexol in cardioangiography. A comparative vectorcardiographic study. Acta Radiol 2000;41:384–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergstra A, van Dijk RB, Brekke O, Buurma AE, Orozco L, den Heijer P, . Hemodynamic effects of iodixanol and iohexol during ventriculography in patients with compromised left ventricular function. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2000;50:314–21.
   Google Scholar
• Cockcroft DW, Gault MH. Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron 1976;16:31–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masui T, Katayama M, Kobayashi S, Sakahara H. Intravenous injection of high and medium concentrations of computed tomography contrast media and related heat sensation, local pain, and adverse reactions. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2005;29:704–8.
   Google Scholar
• Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL, Gensini GG, Gott VL, Griffith LS, . A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 1975;51:5–40.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schmid I, Didier D, Pfammatter T, Garachemani A, Fleisch M, Kirchin MA, . Effects of non-ionic iodinated contrast media on patient heart rate and pressures during intra-cardiac or intra-arterial injection. Int J Cardiol 2007;118:389–96.
   Google Scholar
• Manke C, Marcus C, Page A, Puey J, Batakis O, Fog A. Pain in femoral arteriography. A double-blind, randomized, clinical study comparing safety and efficacy of the iso-osmolar iodixanol 270 mgI/ml and the low-osmolar iomeprol 300 mgI/ml in 9 European centers. Acta Radiol 2003;44:590–6.
   Google Scholar
• Grainger RG. Osmolality of intravascular radiological contrast media. Br J Radiol 1980;53:739–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litmanovich D, Zamboni GA, Hauser TH, Lin PJ, Clouse ME, Raptopoulos V. ECG-gated chest CT angiography with 64-MDCT and tri-phasic IV contrast administration regimen in patients with acute non-specific chest pain. Eur Radiol 2008;18:308–17.
   Google Scholar
• Carbone I, Francone M, Algeri E, Granatelli A, Napoli A, Kirchin MA, . Non-invasive evaluation of coronary artery stent patency with retrospectively ECG-gated 64-slice CT angiography. Eur Radiol 2008;18: 234–43.
   Google Scholar
• Earls JP, Berman EL, Urban BA, Curry CA, Lane JL, Jennings RS, . Prospectively gated transverse coronary CT angiography versus retrospectively gated helical technique: improved image quality and reduced radiation dose. Radiology 2008;246:742–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerl JM, Ravenel JG, Nguyen SA, Suranyi P, Thilo C, Costello P, . Right heart: split-bolus injection of diluted contrast medium for visualization at coronary CT angiography. Radiology 2008;247:356–64.
   Google Scholar