Comparison of two software versions of a commercially available computer-aided detection (CAD) system for detecting breast cancer

References

• Freer TW, Ulissey MJ. Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. Radiology 2001;220: 781–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birdwell RL, Bandodkar P, Ikeda DM. Computer-aided detection with screening mammography in a university hospital setting. Radiology 2005;236:451–7.
   Google Scholar
• Morton MJ, Whaley DH, Brandt KR, Amrami KK. Screening mammograms: interpretation with computer-aided detection – prospective evaluation. Radiology 2006; 239:375–83.
   Google Scholar
• Gromet M. Comparison of computer-aided detection to double reading of screening mammograms: review of 231,221 mammograms. Am J Roentgenol 2008;190: 854–9.
   Google Scholar
• Ko JM, Nicholas MJ, Mendel JB, Slanetz PJ. Prospective assessment of computer-aided detection in interpretation of screening mammography. Am J Roentgenol 2006;187: 1483–91.
   Google Scholar
• Khoo LA, Taylor P, Given-Wilson RM. Computer-aided detection in the United Kingdom National Breast Screening Programme: prospective study. Radiology 2005;237:444–9.
   Google Scholar
• Warren Burhenne LJ, Wood SA, D'Orsi CJ, Feig SA, Kopans DB, O'Shaughnessy KF, . Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography. Radiology 2000;215:554–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brem RF, Baum J, Lechner M, Kaplan S, Souders S, Naul LG, . Improvement in sensitivity of screening mammography with computer-aided detection: a multiinstitutional trial. Am J Roentgenol 2003;181:687–93.
   Google Scholar
• Destounis SV, DiNitto P, Logan-Young W, Bonaccio E, Zuley ML, Willison KM. Can computer-aided detection with double reading of screening mammograms help decrease the false-negative rate? Initial experience. Radiology 2004; 232:578–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenton JJ, Taplin SH, Carney PA, Abraham L, Sickles EA, D'Orsi C, . Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography. N Engl J Med 2007;356:1399–409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall FM. Breast imaging and computer-aided detection. N Engl J Med 2007;356:1464–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishikawa RM, Schmidt RA, Metz CE. Computer-aided screening mammography. N Engl J Med 2007;357:84.
   Google Scholar
• Gur D, Sumkin JH, Rockette HE, Ganott M, Hakim C, Hardesty L, . Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004;96:185–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feig SA, Sickles EA, Evans WP, Linver MN. Re: Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004;96:1260–1.
   Google Scholar
• Roehrig J. The manufacturer's perspective. Br J Radiol 2005;78:S41–5.
   Google Scholar
• Brem RF, Rapelyea JA, Zisman G, Hoffmeister JW, Desimio MP. Evaluation of breast cancer with a computer-aided detection system by mammographic appearance and histopathology. Cancer 2005;104:931–5.
   Google Scholar
• Malich A, Sauner D, Marx C, Facius M, Boehm T, Pfleiderer SO, . Influence of breast lesion size and histologic findings on tumor detection rate of a computer-aided detection system. Radiology 2003;228:851–6.
   Google Scholar
• Helvie MA, Hadjiiski L, Makariou E, Chan HP, Petrick N, Sahiner B, . Sensitivity of noncommercial computer-aided detection system for mammographic breast cancer detection: pilot clinical trial. Radiology 2004;231:208–14.
   Google Scholar
• Brem RF, Hoffmeister JW, Rapelyea JA, Zisman G, Mohtashemi K, Jindal G, . Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection for breast cancer. Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:439–44.
   Google Scholar
• The JS, Schilling KJ, Hoffmeister JW, Friedmann E, McGinnis R, Holcomb RG. Detection of breast cancer with full-field digital mammography and computer-aided detection. Am J Roentgenol 2009;192:337–40.
   Google Scholar
• Yang SK, Moon WK, Cho N, Park JS, Cha JH, Kim SM, . Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography: sensitivity and reproducibility in serial examinations. Radiology 2007;244:104–11.
   Google Scholar
• Baum F, Fischer U, Obenauer S, Grabbe E. Computer-aided detection in direct digital full-field mammography: initial results. Eur Radiol 2002;12:3015–17.
   Google Scholar
• Baker JA, Lo JY, Delong DM, Floyd CE. Computer-aided detection in screening mammography: variability in cues. Radiology 2004;233:411–17.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng B, Hardesty LA, Poller WR, Sumkin JH, Golla S. Mammography with computer-aided detection: reproducibility assessment initial experience. Radiology 2003;228: 58–62.
   Google Scholar
• Wei J, Hadjiiski LM, Sahiner B, Chan HP, Ge J, Roubidoux MA, . Computer-aided detection systems for breast masses: comparison of performances on full-field digital mammograms and digitized screen-film mammograms. Acad Radiol 2007;14:659–69.
   Google Scholar
• Ge J, Hadjiiski LM, Sahiner B, Wei J, Helvie MA, Zhou C, . Computer-aided detection system for clustered microcalcifications: comparison of performance on full-field digital mammograms and digitized screen-film mammograms. Phys Med Biol 2007;52:981–1000.
   Google Scholar
• Kim SJ, Moon WK, Cho N, Cha JH, Kim SM, Im JG. Computer-aided detection in digital mammography: comparison of craniocaudal, mediolateral oblique, and mediolateral views. Radiology 2006;241:695–701.
   Google Scholar
• American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system: BI-RADS atlas. Fourth edition. Reston, VA; ACR; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis RL, Meade AA, Mathiason MA, Willison KM, Logan-Young W. Evaluation of computer-aided detection systems in the detection of small invasive breast carcinoma. Radiology 2007;245:88–94.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng B, Ganott MA, Britton CA, Hakim CM, Hardesty LA, Chang TS, . Soft-copy mammographic readings with different computer-assisted detection cuing environments: preliminary findings. Radiology 2001;221:633–40.
   Google Scholar
• Michaelson JS, Satija S, Kopans D, Moore R, Silverstein M, Comegno A, . Gauging the impact of breast carcinoma screening in terms of tumor size and death rate. Cancer 2003;98:2114–24.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baker JA, Rosen EL, Lo JY, Gimenez EI, Walsh R, Soo MS. Computer-aided detection (CAD) in screening mammography: sensitivity of commercial CAD systems for detecting architectural distortion. Am J Roentgenol 2003;181:1083–8.
   Google Scholar
• Gur D, Stalder JS, Hardesty LA, Zheng B, Sumkin JH, Chough DM, . Computer-aided detection performance in mammographic examination of masses: assessment. Radiology 2004;233:418–23.
   Google Scholar
• Velikova M, Samulski M, Lucas PJ, Karssemeijer N. Improved mammographic CAD performance using multi-view information: a Bayesian network framework. Phys Med Biol 2009;54:1131–47.
   Google Scholar
• van Engeland S, Karssemeijer N. Combining two mammographic projections in a computer aided mass detection method. Med Phys 2007;34:898–905.
   Google Scholar
• Wu YT, Wei J, Hadjiiski LM, Sahiner B, Zhou C, Ge J, . Bilateral analysis based false-positive reduction for computer-aided mass detection. Med Phys 2007;34: 3334–44.
   Google Scholar
• Paquerault S, Petrick N, Chan HP, Sahiner B, Helvie MA. Improvement of computerized mass detection on mammograms: fusion of two-view information. Med Phys 2002;29:238–47.
   Google Scholar
• Soo MS, Rosen EL, Xia JQ, Ghate S, Baker JA. Computer-aided detection of amorphous calcifications. Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:887–92.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert FJ, Astley SM, Gillan MG, Agbaje OF, Wallis MG, James J, . Single reading with computer-aided detection for screening mammography. N Engl J Med 2008;359: 1675–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skaane P, Kshirsagar A, Stapleton S, Young K, Castellino RA. Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms. Am J Roentgenol 2007; 188:377–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgian-Smith D, Moore RH, Halpern E, Yeh ED, Rafferty EA, D'Alessandro HA, . Blinded comparison of computer-aided detection with human second reading in screening mammography. Am J Roentgenol 2007;189: 1135–41.
   Google Scholar
• Karssemeijer N. Computer-aided detection versus independent double reading of masses on mammograms. Radiology 2003;227:192–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert FJ, Astley SM, Boggis CR, McGee MA, Griffiths PM, Duffy SW, . Variable size computer-aided detection prompts and mammography film reader decisions. Breast Cancer Res 2008;10:R72.
   Google Scholar
• Ciatto S, Rosselli Del Turco M, Burke P, Visioli C, Paci E, Zappa M. Comparison of standard and double reading and computer-aided detection (CAD) of interval cancers at prior negative screening mammograms: blind review. Br J Cancer 2003;89:1645–9.
   Google Scholar