Comparison of Non-Enhanced, Bolus Enhanced, and Delayed Scanning Techniques in Computed Tomography of Hepatic Tumours

References

• Alpern M., Lawson T., Foley D., et al. Focal hepatic masses and fatty infiltration detected by enhanced dynamic CT. Radiology 1986; 158: 45
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardino M., Erwin B., Steinberg H., Baumgartner B., Torres W., Gedaudas-McClees K. Delayed hepatic CT scanning. Increased confidence and improved detection of hepatic metastases. Radiology 1986; 159: 71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bressler E., Alpern M., Glazer G., Francis I., Ensminger W. Hypervascular hepatic metastases. CT evaluation. Radiology 1987; 162: 49
   Google Scholar
• Brick S., Hill M., Lande I. The mistaken or intermediate CT diagnosis of hepatic metastases. The value of sonography. Amer. J. Roentgenol 1987; 148: 723
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgener F., Hamlin D. Contrast enhancement in abdominal CT. Bolus vs. infusion. Amer. J. Roentgenol 1981; 137: 351
   Google Scholar
• Burgener F., Hamlin D. Contrast enhancement of hepatic tumors in CT. Comparison between bolus and infusion techniques. Amer. J. Roentgenol 1983; 140: 291
   Google Scholar
• Dean P., Kivisaari L., Kormano M. The diagnostic potential of contrast enhancement pharmacokinetics. Invest. Radiol 1978; 13: 533
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley D., Berland L., Lawson T., Smith D., Thorsen K. Contrast enhancement technique for dynamic hepatic computed tomographic scanning. Radiology 1983; 147: 797
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeny P., Marks W. Patterns of contrast enhancement of benign and malignant hepatic neoplasms during bolus dynamic and delayed CT. Radiology 1986; 160: 613
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeny P., Marks W. Hepatic hemangioma. Dynamic bolus CT. Amer. J. Roentgenol 1986; 147: 711
   Google Scholar
• Göthlin J., Guiterrez O., Kurdziel J., Schwartz S. Computed tomographic arteriography (CTA) of the liver. Evaluation of technique, results and indications. Europ. J. Radiol 1986; 6: 191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson M., Sheedy P., Stanson A., Stephens D., Hattery R., Adson M. Computed tomography and angiography of cavernous hemangiomas of the liver. Radiology 1981; 138: 115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kormano M., Dean P. Extravascular contrast material. The major component of contrast enhancement. Radiology 1976; 121: 379
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundstedt C., Ekberg H., Lunderquist A., Tranberg K. Site and number of liver tumors recorded at angiography and computed tomography compared with the findings at laparotomy and of resected liver specimens. Acta Radiol 1987; 28: 153
   Google Scholar
• Marchal G., Baert A., Wilms G. CT of noncystic liver lesions. Bolus enhancement. Amer. J. Roentgenol 1980; 135: 57
   Google Scholar
• Miller D. L., Simmons J. T., Chang R., et al. Hepatic metastasis detection. Comparison of three CT contrast enhancement methods. Radiology 1987; 165: 785
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss A., Dean P., Axel L., Goldberg H., Glazer G., Friedman M. Dynamic CT of hepatic masses with intravenous and intraarterial contrast material. Amer. J. Roentgenol 1982; 136: 847
   Google Scholar
• Nelson R., Chezmar J., Steinberg H., et al. Focal hepatic lesions. Detection by dynamic and/delayed computed tomography versus short TE/TR spin echo and fast field echo magnetic resonance imaging. Gastrointest. Radiol 1988; 13: 115
   Google Scholar
• Paushter D., Zeman R., Schiebler M., Choyke P., Jaffe M., Clark L. CT evaluation of suspected hepatic metastases. Comparison of techniques for iv contrast enhancement. Amer. J. Roentgenol 1989; 152: 152
   Google Scholar
• Perkerson R., Erwin B., Baumgartner B., et al. CT densities in delayed iodine hepatic scanning. Radiology 1985; 155: 445
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollard J., Fleischli D., Nebesar R. Angiography of hepatic neoplasms. Radiol. Clin. N Amer 1970; 8: 31
   Google Scholar
• Reinig J., Dwyer A., Miller D., et al. Liver metastasis detection. Comparative sensitivities of MR imaging and CT scanning. Radiology 1987; 162: 43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sager E. M., Scheel B., Talle K. Increased detectability of liver metastases by the use of contrast enhancement in computed tomography. A comparison between the precontrast, the immediate postcontrast and the one hour postcontrast scan. Acta Radiol. Diagnosis 1985; 26: 369
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zocholl G., Kuhn F., Augustin N., Thelen M. Diagnostische Aussagekraft von Sonographie und Computertomographie bei Lebermetastasen. Fortschr. Röntgenstr 1988; 148: 8
   Google Scholar