64
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Transfemoral Digital Subtraction Aortography

Are diluted high osmolar contrast media acceptable?

, , , , &
Pages 137-140 | Accepted 20 Nov 1990, Published online: 07 Jan 2010

References

  • Bettmann M. A., Bourdillon P. D., Barry W. H., Brush K. A., Levin D. C. Contrast agents for cardiac angiography. Effects of a nonionic agent vs a standard ionic agent. Radiology 1984; 153: 583
  • Crummy A. B., Stieghlorst M. F., Turski P. A., et al. Digital subtraction angiography. Current status and use of intra-arterial injection. Radiology 1982; 145: 303
  • Dawson P. Digital subtraction angiography — a critical appraisal. Clin. Radiol 1988; 39: 474
  • Dawson P., Grainger R. G., Pitfield J. The new low-osmolar contrast media. A simple guide. Clin. Radiol 1983; 34: 221
  • Dawson P., Howell M. The non-ionic dimers. A new class of contrast agents. Br. J. Radiol 1986; 59: 987
  • Dotter C. T., Rösch J., Erlandson M., Buschman R. W., Ogilvie R. Iopamidol arteriography. Discomfort and pain. Radiology 1985; 155: 819
  • Folke K., Andrew E., Laulund S., Hansen P. F. Omnipaque and Urografin in left ventriculography and coronary arteriography. A randomised, double blind study. Br. J. Radiol 1985; 58: 319
  • Gordon I. J., Skoblar R. S., Chicatelli P. D., Leon J. A comparison of Iohexol and Conray 60 in peripheral angiography. AJR 1984; 142: 563
  • Grainger R. G. A clinical trial of a new low osmolality contrast medium. Sodium and meglumine ioxaglate (Hexabrix) compared with meglumine iothalamate (Conray) for carotid angiography. Br. J. Radiol 1979; 52: 781
  • Grainger R. G. Osmolality of intravascular contrast media. Br. J. Radiol 1980; 53: 739
  • Hall J. R., Hacking P. M., Layzell T. Comparison of venous digital subtraction angiography and aortography in patients with peripheral vascular disease of the lower limbs. Clin. Radiol 1985; 36: 315
  • Katayama H., Ishida O., Osawa T., et al. Clinical survey on adverse reactions of contrast media (final report). Nippon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi 1988; 48: 423
  • Lyons J., Brooks N., Cattell M., Isolani-Smyth E., Balcon R. Comparison of Hexabrix 320 with Conray 420 for left ventriculography in patients with coronary artery disease. Br. J. Radiol 1984; 57: 209
  • Sacks B. A., Ellison H. P., Barter S., Vine H. S., Palestrant A. M. A comparison of Hexabrix and Renografin 60 in peripheral angiography. AJR 1983; 140: 975
  • Sovak M., Robertson H. J. F. Osmolality and ionicity. Confusion in terminology applied to contrast media. (Letter to the editor). Radiology 1988; 168: 281
  • Steinberg E. P., Anderson G. F., Powe N. R., et al. Use of low-osmolality contrast media in a price-sensitive environment. AJR 1988; 151: 271
  • Thornbury J. R., Fischer H. W. Issues in uroradiology. Curr. Imaging 1989; 1: 3
  • White R. I., Halden W. J. Liquid gold. Low osmolality contrast media. Radiology 1986; 159: 559
  • Wojciechowski J., Johansson R., Björk L. Iopamidol compared with Conray in peripheral angiography. Acta Radiol. Diagnosis 1982; 23: 549

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.