Evaluation of Time-of-Flight and Phase-Contrast Mra Sequences at 1.0 T for Diagnosis of Carotid Artery Disease

References

• Anderson C. M., Edelmann R. R., Turski P. Clinical magnetic resonance angiography. Raven Press, New York 1993
   Google Scholar
• Anderson C. M., Saloner D., Lee R. E., et al. Assessment of carotid artery stenosis by MR angiography. Comparison with X-ray angiography and color-coded Doppler ultrasound. AJNR 1992; 13: 989
   Google Scholar
• Anderson C. M., Saloner D., Tsuruda J. S., Shapeero L. G., Lee R. E. Artifacts in maximum-intensity-projection display of MR angiograms. AJR 1990; 154: 623
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blatter D. D., Bahr A. L., Parker D. I., et al. Cervical carotid MR angiography with multiple overlapping thin-slab acquisition. Comparison with conventional angiography. AJR 1993; 161: 1269
   Google Scholar
• Bradley W. G., Waluch V. Blood flow. Magnetic resonance imaging. Radiology 1985; 154: 443
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiesa R., Melissano G., Castellan N., Veglia F., Scotti G., Grossi A. Three dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography in carotid artery surgery. A comparison with digital subtraction angiography. Eur. J. Vasc. Surg. 1993; 7: 171
   Google Scholar
• Dumoulin C. L., Souza S. P., Walker M. F., Wagle W. Three-dimensional phase contrast angiography. Magn. Reson. Med. 1989; 9: 139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans A. J., Blinder R. A., Herfekens R. J., et al. Effects of turbulence on signal intensity in gradient echo images. Invest. Radiol. 1988; 23: 512
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans A. J., Richardson D. B., Tien R., et al. Poststenotic signal loss in MR angiography. Effects of echo time, flow compensation, and fractional echo. AJNR 1993; 14: 721
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heiserman J. E., Drayer B. P., Fram E. K., et al. Carotid artery stenosis. Clinical efficacy of two-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography. Radiology 1992; 182: 761
   Google Scholar
• Huston J., III, Lewis B. D., Wiebers D. O., Meyer F. B., Riederer S. J., Weaver A. L. Carotid artery. Prospective blinded comparison of two-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography with conventional angiography and duplex US. Radiology 1993; 186: 339
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller P. J., Drayer B. P., Fram E. K., Williams K. D., Dumoulin C. L., Souza S. P. MR angiography with two-dimensional acquisition and three-dimensional display. Radiology 1989; 173: 527
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krug B., Kugel H., Friedmann G., Bunke J., van Dijk P., Schmidt R., Hirche H. J. MR imaging of poststenotic flow phenomena. Experimental studies. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 1991; 1: 585
   Google Scholar
• Laster R. E., Acker J. D., Halford H. H., III, Nauert T. C. Assessment of MR angiography versus arteriography for evaluation of cervical carotid bifurcation disease. AJNR 1993; 14: 681
   Google Scholar
• Litt A. W., Eidelman E., Pinto R. S., et al. Diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis. Comparison of 2DFT time-of-flight MR angiography with contrast angiography in 50 patients. AJNR 1991; 12: 149
   Google Scholar
• Lustgarten J. H., Solomon R. A., Quest D. O., Khanjdi A. G., Mohr J. P. Carotid endarterectomy after noninvasive evaluation by Duplex ultrasonography and magnetic resonance angiography. Neurosurgery 1994; 34: 612
   Google Scholar
• Malmgren L., Ståhlberg F., Holtås S., Larsson E.-M., Persson B. R. Improved receiver coil for upper thoracic spine imaging in vertical magnetic field. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 1992; 2: 191
   Google Scholar
• Masaryk A. M., Ross J. S., Dicello M. C., Modic M. T., Paranandi L., Masaryk T. J. 3DFT MR angiography of the carotid bifurcation. Potential and limitations as a screening examination. Radiology 1991; 179: 797
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masaryk T. J., Modic M. T., Ruggieri P. M., et al. Three-dimensional (volume) gradient-echo imaging of the carotid bifurcation. Preliminary clinical experience. Radiology 1989; 171: 801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mistretta C. A. Relative characteristics of MR angiography and competing vascular imaging modalities. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 1993; 3: 685
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittl R. L., Jr., Broderick M., Carpenter J. P., et al. Blinded-reader comparison of magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasonography for carotid artery bifurcation stenosis. Stroke 1994; 25: 4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker D. L., Yuan C., Blatter D. D. MR angiography by multiple thin slab 3D acquisition. Magn. Reson. Med. 1991; 17: 434
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel M. R., Klufas R. A., Kim D., Edelman R. R., Kent K. C. MR angiography of the carotid bifurcation. Artifacts and limitations. AJR 1994; 162: 1431
   Google Scholar
• Perniconi J. R., Siebert J. E., Potchen E. J., Pera A., Dumoulin C. L., Souza S. P. Three-dimensional phase-contrast MR angiography in the head and neck. AJNR 1990; 11: 457
   Google Scholar
• Pike G. B., Hu B. S., Glover G. H., Enzmann D. R. Magnetization transfer time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography. Magn. Reson. Med. 1992; 25: 372
   Google Scholar
• Polak J. F., Kalina P., Donaldson M. C., O'Leary D. H., Whittemore A. D., Mannick J. A. Carotid endarterectomy. Preoperative evaluation of candidates with combined Doppler sonography and MR angiography. Work in progress. Radiology 1993; 186: 333
   Google Scholar
• Purdy D., Cadena G., Laub G. The design of variable tip angle slab selection (TONE) pulses for improved 3D MR angiography. Proc. Soc. Magn. Reson. 11th Annual Meeting. Berlin 1992; 882
   Google Scholar
• Robison R. O., Blatter D. D., Parker D. L., Barney W. W., Perry D. M., Goodrich K. C. Reduction of slab boundary artifacts with multiple overlapping thin slab acquisition in MR angiography of the cervical carotid artery. J. Magn. Reson. Med. 1994; 4: 529
   Google Scholar
• Ruggieri P. M., Laub G. A., Masaryk T. J., Modic M. T. Intracranial circulation. Pulse-sequence considerations in three-dimensional (volume) MR angiography. Radiology 1989; 171: 785
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott A. W. MR angiography in neurologic disease. Radiology 1994; 193: 1
   Google Scholar
• Spielman R. P., Zhen J., Triebel H. J., Nicolas V., Heller M., Bücheler E. Magnetic resonance imaging and pulsed Doppler sonography of poststenotic jets. Correlation between signal void and flow velocity distribution. Magn. Reson. Imaging 1992; 10: 893
   Google Scholar
• Ståhlberg F., Søndergaard L., Thomsen C., Henriksen O. Quantification of complex flow using MR phase imaging — a study of parameters influencing the phase/velocity relation. Magn. Reson. Imaging 1992; 10: 13
   Google Scholar
• Ståhlberg F., Thomsen C., Søndergaard L., Henriksen O. Pulse sequence design for MR velocity mapping of complex flow. Notes on the necessity of low echo times. Magn. Reson. Imaging 1994; 12: 1255
   Google Scholar
• Tkach J. A., Ruggieri P. M., Dillinger J. J., Ross J. S., Modic M. T., Masaryk T. J. Three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography with a specialized gradient head coil. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 1993; 3: 365
   Google Scholar
• Tkach J. A., Ruggieri P. M., Ross J. S., Modic M. T., Dillinger J. J., Masaryk T. J. Pulse sequence strategies for vascular contrast in time-of-flight carotid MR angiography. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 1993; 3: 811
   Google Scholar
• Turnipseed W. D., Kennell T. W., Turski P. A., Acher C. W., Hoch J. R. Magnetic resonance angiography and duplex imaging. Noninvasive tests for selecting symptomatic carotid endarterectomy candidates. Surgery 1993; 114: 643
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnipseed W. D., Kennell T. W., Turski P. A., Acher C. W., Hoch J. R. Combined use of duplex imaging and magnetic resonance angiography for evaluation of patients with symptomatic ipsilateral high-grade carotid stenosis. J. Vasc. Surg. 1993; 17: 832
   Google Scholar
• Urchuk S. N., Plewes D. B. Mechanisms of flow-induced signal loss in MR angiography. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 1992; 2: 453
   Google Scholar
• Wesbey G. E., Bergan J. J., Moreland S. I., et al. Cerebrovascular magnetic resonance angiography. A critical verification. J. Vasc. Surg. 1992; 16: 619
   Google Scholar
• Wolff S. D., Balaban R. S. Magnetic transfer contrast (MTC) and tissue water proton relaxation in vivo. Magn. Reson. Med. 1989; 10: 135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar