Effects of Varying Filter Kernel Sizes on the Image Quality of Interstitial Lung Diseases

References

• Abe K., Katsuragawa S., Sasaki Y. A fully automated adaptive unsharp masking technique in digital chest radiograph. Invest. Radiol. 1992; 27: 64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armitage P., Berry G. Statistical methods in medical research2nd edn. Blackwell, Oxford 1987
   Google Scholar
• Chakraborty D. P., Breatnach E., Yester M. V. Digital and conventional imaging. A modified ROC-study for observer performance using simulated nodules. Radiology 1986; 158: 35
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cook L. T., Insana M. F., Mc Fadden M. A., Hall T. J., Cox G. G. Comparison of the low-contrast detectability of a screen-film system and third generation computed radiography. Med. Phys. 1994; 21: 691
   Google Scholar
• Cowen A. R., Workman A., Price J. S. Physical aspects of photostimulable phosphor computed radiography. Br. J. Radiol. 1993; 66: 332
   Google Scholar
• Dölken W., Chowanetz W., Horwitz A. E., Krahe T., Landwehr P., Lackner K. Interstitielle Lungenerkrankungen. Eine Vergleichsstudie zwischen einer Film-Folien-Kombination und der digitalen Speicherfolientechnik. RöFO 1992; 156: 61
   Google Scholar
• Fajardo L. J., Hillmann B. J., Pond G. D., Carmody R. F., Johnson J. E., Ferrell W. R. Detection of pneumothorax. Comparison of digital and conventional chest imaging. AJR 1989; 152: 475
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley W. D., Wilson C. R., Dretto M. San. The effect of varying high pass filter parameters on the detectability of isolated pulmonary nodules in digitized chest images. Invest. Radiol. 1986; 21: 305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman L. R., Foley W. D., Wilson C. R., Tikofsky R. S., Hoffmann R. G. Pneumothorax and other lung diseases. Effect of altered resolution and edge enhancement on diagnosis with digitized radiographs. Radiology 1988; 167: 83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman L. R., Wilson C. R., Foley W. D. Digital radiography of the chest. Promises and problems. AJR 1988; 150: 1241
   Google Scholar
• Ishida M. Image processing. Computed radiography, Y. Tateno, T. Iinuma, M. Takano. Springer-Verlag, Tokyo 1987; 16
   Google Scholar
• Kehler M., Albrechtsson U., Andrésdóttír A., et al. Digital luminescence radiography in interstitial lung disease. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Acta Radiol. 1991; 32: 18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lams P. M., Cocklin M. L. Spatial resolution requirements for digital chest radiographs. An ROC study of observer performance in selected cases. Radiology 1986; 158: 11
   Google Scholar
• Mac Mahon H., Vyborny C., Sabeti V. The effect of digital unsharp masking on the detectability of interstitial infiltrates and pneumothoraces. Pro SPIE 1985; 555: 246
   Google Scholar
• Mac Mahon H., Vyborny C. J., Metz C. E., Doi K., Sabeti V., Solomon S. L. Digital radiography of subtle pulmonary abnormalities. An ROC-study of the effect of pixel size on observer performance. Radiology 1986; 158: 21
   Google Scholar
• Miyahara J. Imaging plate. Computed radiography, Y. Tateno, T. Iinuma, M. Takano. Springer-Verlag, Tokyo 1987; 7
   Google Scholar
• Müller R.-D., Hirche H., Voss M., Buddenbrock B., Bosch E. ROC-Analyse zur Bildnachverarbeitung digitaler Lumineszenzradiogramme in der Thoraxdiagnostik. Röfo 1995; 162: 163
   Google Scholar
• Neufang K. F. R., Krug B., Lorenz R., Steinbrich W. Kann die digitale Lumineszenzradiographie (DLR) in der Thoraxdiagnostik die konventionelle. Röntgenaufnahmetechnik ersetzen?. RöFO 1990; 152: 501
   Google Scholar
• Oestmann J. W., Greene R., Rubens J. R., et al. High frequency edge enhancement in the detection of fine pulmonary lines. Parity between storage phosphor digital images and conventional chest radiography. Invest. Radiol. 1989; 24: 643
   Google Scholar
• Prokop M., Schaefer C. M., Oestmann J. W. Improved parameters for unsharp mask filtering of digital chest radiographs. Radiology 1993; 187: 521
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sachs L. Varianzanalytische Methoden. Angewandte Statistik, L. Sachs. Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1992; 612
   Google Scholar
• Schaefer C. M., Greene R., Llewellyn H. J., et al. Interstitial lung disease. Impact of postprocessing in digital storage phosphor imaging. Radiology 1991; 178: 733
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherrier R. H., Chiles C., Wilkinson W. E., Johnson G. A., Ravin C. E. Effects of image processing on nodule detection rates in digitized chest radiographs. ROC study of observer performance. Radiology 1988; 166: 447
   Google Scholar
• Sorenson J. A., Mitchell C. R. Evaluation of optical unsharp masking and contrast enhancement of low scatter chest radiographs. AJR 1987; 149: 275
   Google Scholar
• Takahashi K., Kohda K., Miyahara J., Kanemitsu Y., Amitani K., Shionya S. Mechanism of photostimulated luminescence in BaFX. Eu2+ (X=Cl, Br). phosphors. J. Lumi. 1984; 31/32: 266
   Google Scholar
• Takashima T. Chest. Computed radiography, Y. Tateno, T. Iinuma, M. Takano. Springer-Verlag, Tokyo 1987; 51
   Google Scholar
• Yarwood J. R. H., Moores B. M. Image processing of digital chest ionograms. Br. J. Radiol. 1988; 61: 943
   Google Scholar