Sensitization and Radiation Response in Cases with Carcinoma of the Uterine Cervix: Investigations in 720 cases treated at Radiumhemmet 1954–1961

References

• Agnew A. M., Fidler H. K., Boyes D. A. Evaluation of radiation response. Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec. 1960; 79: 698
   Google Scholar
• Arrighi A. A. La respuesta citologica a la radiation. Valor pronostico. Bol. Obstet. Ginec. B. Aires 1960; 39: 274
   Google Scholar
• Besserer G., Smolka H. Zur Frage der prognostischen Bedeutung von Veränderungen im Scheidenausstrich nach Radium-und Röntgenbestrahlung. Strahlenterapie 1952; 89: 442
   Google Scholar
• Carter B. Discussion: Cytologic prognosis in cancer of the cervix. Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec. 1960; 79: 704
   Google Scholar
• Coleman S. A., Rube I. F., Carroll D. S., et al. An evaluation of the sensitization response as a method for determining radiation sensitivity. Amer. J. Clin. Path. 1960; 33: 20
   Google Scholar
• Darcis L. Considérations sur la radiosensibilité des cancers cervico-utérins. Path. Biol. 1962; 10: 1291
   Google Scholar
• Davis H. J. Radiosensitivity and cervical cancer. Obstet. Gynec. Survey 1960; 15: 301
   Google Scholar
• Davis H. J., Jones H. W., Dickson R. J. The bioassay of host radiosensitivity. An index of radiocurability applied to cervical carcinoma. Cancer 1960; 13: 358
   Google Scholar
• Donlan Ch., Platt L. I. Evaluation of the SR and RR smear in irradiation of carcinoma of the cervix. J. Amer. Med. Wom. Ass. 1960; 15: 576
   Google Scholar
• Feiner L. L., Garin A. Cytological response to radiation in noncervical cancers of the female genital tract. Cancer 1963; 16: 166
   Google Scholar
• Glucksmann A. Quantitative histological analysis of radiation-effects in human carcinomata. Brit. Med. Bull. 1946; 4: 26
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Glucksmann A. Prognosis based on biopsies. Brit. Congress Obstet. Gynaec. 1949; 234, Transac. XII
   Google Scholar
• Glucksmann A. Radiation changes in carcinoma of the cervix. Acta Unio Internat. contra Cancrum 1958; 14: 358
   Google Scholar
• Glucksmann A., Spear F. G. The qualitative and quantitative histological examination of biopsy material from patients treated by radiation for carcinoma of the cervix uteri. Brit. J. Radiol. 1945; 18: 313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gompel C. Radiation changes in carcinoma of the cervix. Acta Unio Internat. contra Cancrum 1958; 14: 363
   Google Scholar
• Graham J. B., Graham R. M. Pharmacological modification of resistance to radiation. A preliminary report. Proc. Nat. Acad. sci. U.S.A. 1949; 35: 102
   Google Scholar
• Graham J. B., Graham R. M. The modification of resistance to ionizing radiation by humoral agents. Cancer 1950; 3: 709
   Google Scholar
• Graham J. B., Graham R. M. Enhanced effectiveness of radiotherapy in cancer of the uterine cervix. Surg. Forum 1952; 332
   Google Scholar
• Graham J. B., Graham R. M. A method of enhancing the effectiveness of radiotherapy in cancer of the uterine cervix. Cancer 1953; 6: 68
   Google Scholar
• Graham J. B., Graham R. M. Cytological prognosis in cancer of the uterine cervix treated radiologically. Cancer 1955; 8: 59
   Google Scholar
• Graham R. M. The effect of radiation on vaginal cells in cervical carcinoma. 1. Description of cellular changes. Surg. Gynec. Obstet. 1947; 84: 153
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Graham R. M. Radiation changes in carcinoma of the cervix. Acta Unio Internat. contra Cancrum 1958; 14: 364
   Google Scholar
• Graham R. M. Cytologic prognosis in cancer of the cervix. Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec. 1960; 79: 700
   Google Scholar
• Graham R. M., Graham J. B. A cellular index of sensitivity to ionizing radiation. The sensitization response. Cancer 1953; 6: 215
   Google Scholar
• Graham R. M., Graham J. B. Cytologic prognosis in cancer of the uterine cervix. Progress in gynecology. Grune & Stratton, New York 1957; Vol. 3: 114
   Google Scholar
• Graham R. M., Graham J. B. Cytologic prognosis in cancer of the cervix. Two year survival rates in a randomized series. Amer. J. Roentgenol. 1962; 87: 56
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham R. M., Graham J. B. Cytologic selection of treatment in cancer of the cervix. Progress in Gynecology. Grune & Stratton, New York 1963; Vol. 4: 93
   Google Scholar
• Graham R. M., Graham J. B., Graffeo A. J. The influence of adrenal cortical hormones on sensitivity of mice to ionizing radiation. Endocrinology 1950; 46: 434
   Google Scholar
• Graham R. M., Graham J. B., Liu W. Prognosis in cancer of the uterine cervix based on the vaginal smear before treatment, SR—The sensitization response. Surg. Gynec. Obstet. 1954; 99: 555
   Google Scholar
• Grattarola R., Luciani L. La radiation reaction nell'indicazione terapeutica del carcinoma del collo uterino al 1° stadio. Tumori 1962; 48: 99
   Google Scholar
• von Haam E. Some observations in the field of exfoliative cytology. Amer. J. clin. Path. 1954; 24: 652
   Google Scholar
• Herman C. G., Hughes H. E., Gusberg S. B. The endocrine basis for the sensitization response. Surg. Gynec. Obstet. 1959; 108: 463
   Google Scholar
• Hultberg S. Studien über Rezidive bei bestrahltem Carcinoma colli uteri. Acta radiol. 1944; 25: 59
   Google Scholar
• Johansson B., Zajicek J. Sampling of cell material from human tumours by aspiration biopsy. Nature 1963; 200: 1333
   Google Scholar
• Jones H. W., Goldberg B., Davis H. J., Burns B. C., Jr. Cellular changes in vaginal and buccal smears after radiation: An index of the radiocurability of carcinoma of the cervix. Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec. 1959; 78: 1083
   Google Scholar
• Jordan M. J. Discussion: Cytologic prognosis in cancer of the cervix. Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec. 1960; 79: 704
   Google Scholar
• Kangas S. Radiation response in patients with cervical cancer. Acta path. microbiol. scand. 1961/1962, Suppl. 151–156: 179
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann W., Khan B. Evaluation of cytology as an aid in the prognosis of the treatment of cancer of the cervix uteri. Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec. 1960; 79: 470
   Google Scholar
• Kjellgren O. The radiation reaction in the vaginal smear and its prognostic significance. Studies on radiologically treated cases of cancer of the uterine cervix. Acta radiol. 1958, Suppl. 168
   Google Scholar
• Kjellgren O. Enhanced radiation reaction in the vaginal smear by humoral agents and surgical spaying. Acta cytol. 1962; 6: 455
   Google Scholar
• Kjellgren O. Radiation dose and radiation reaction in the vaginal smear in carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Acta radiol. 1962; 58: 435
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohn G. The vaginal smear as a prognostic aid in carcinoma of the cervix treated according to the individualized Stockholm method. Acta radiol. 1954; 41: 446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kottmeier H.-L. Do serial biopsies disturb the healing process of the irradiated cervical carcinoma. Acta cytol. 1959; 3: 397
   Google Scholar
• Kottmeier H.-L, Gray M. J. Rectal and bladder injuries in relation to radiation dosage in carcinoma of the cervix. A 5 year follow-up. Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec. 1961; 82: 74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanier R. R., Wikle W. T. The clinical significance of “SR” (sensitization response to radiation) in normal vaginal mucosa. Radiology 1959; 72: 217
   Google Scholar
• Limburg H., Napp J. H., Wilbrand U. Die prognostische Beurteilung des Kollumkarzinoms nach Strahlenbehandlung durch Probeentnahme und Scheidenabstrich. Geburtsh. Frauenheilk. 1952; 12: 723
   Google Scholar
• Martzloff K. H. Carcinoma of the cervix uteri. Bull. Hopkins Hosp. 1923; 34: 141
   Google Scholar
• Meiling R. L. Erfahrungen mit radioaktivem Kobalt (Co 60) in der Behandlung des Collumcarcinoms am Krankenhaus der Ohio Staats Universität. Arch. Gynäk. 1953; 183: 417
   Google Scholar
• Mengert W. Discussion: Cellular changes in vaginal and buccal smears after radiation. An index of the radiocurability of carcinoma of the cervix. Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec. 1959; 78: 1099
   Google Scholar
• Merrill J. A. Cytohistologic evaluation of radiation response in carcinoma of the cervix. Progress in radiation therapy. Grune & Stratton, New York 1958; 144
   Google Scholar
• Merrill J. A., Wood D. A., Zippen C. Radiosensitivity-testing procedures in cancer of the cervix. Cancer Suppl. 1961; 14: 113
   Google Scholar
• Merrill J. A. Radiosensitivity of cervical cancer. Surg. Clin. N. Amer. 1962; 42: 985
   Google Scholar
• Messelt O. T. Radiation changes in carcinoma of the cervix. Acta Unio Internat. contra Cancrum 1958; 14: 367
   Google Scholar
• Mohr H.-J. Grundsätzliche Fragen zur Beurteilung zytologischer Bestrahlungsveränderungen aus dem Vaginal Smear. Gynäkologische Zytologie. Theodor Steinkoppf, Leipzig 1954
   Google Scholar
• Montalvo Ruiz L., Jimenez Tebar V. Symposium: Radiation cell changes. Acta cytol. 1959; 3: 402
   Google Scholar
• Moore J. G., Chang N. H., Scott E., Morton D. G. The early assessment of irradiation therapy in cervical cancer. Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec. 1963; 86: 677
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen A. M. Cytological changes in vaginal smears in radium and roentgen irradiation of uterine carcinoma and their prognostic significance. Preliminary report. Acta radiol. 1952; 37: 479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novak E. R. Radioresistant cervical cancer. Obstet. Gynec. 1954; 4: 251
   Google Scholar
• Östberg H., Darcis L. Study on sensitization response on 200 patients with carcinoma of the cervix treated at the Radiumhemmet by the current Stockholm technique. Acta obstet. gynec. scand. 1956; 35: 25
   Google Scholar
• Paullada J. J., Rubio L. B., Montaño G., et al. Combined hormonal and irradiation therapy in advanced cancer of the uterine cervix. Cancer 1962; 15: 437
   Google Scholar
• Rakoff A. Discussion: Cellular changes in vaginal and buccal smears after radiation. An index of the radiocurability of carcinoma of the cervix. Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec. 1959; 78: 1099
   Google Scholar
• Rauramo L., Kangas S. Radiation response and its significance in patients with cancer of the cervix. Ann. Chir. Gynaec. Fenn. 1964; 53: 120
   Google Scholar
• Richards B. M., Atkin N. B. DNA content of human tumours: Change in uterine tumours during radiotherapy and their response to treatment. Brit. J. Cancer 1959; 13: 788
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth O. A. Discussion on: V. Grünberger: Die Prognosestellung der Radiumwirkung auf das Collumcarcinom auf Grund cytologischer Veränderungen nach Glücksmann. Arch: Gynaek. 1951; 180: 64
   Google Scholar
• Rummel A. Zur Frage der prognostischen Beurteilung des Kollumkarzinoms aus dem zytologischen Bild. Zbl. Gynäk. 1953; 75: 1541
   Google Scholar
• Shier C. B. The prognosis of carcinoma of the cervix uteri by vaginal smear. Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec. 1954; 67: 286
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shier C. B. Prognosis in carcinoma of the cervix as determined by vaginal smear. Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec. 1961; 82: 37
   Google Scholar
• Silverman S., Sheline G. E. Effects of radiation on exfoliated normal and malignant oral cells. A preliminary study. Cancer 1961; 14: 587
   Google Scholar
• Siracký J., Belohorský B., Riedel J. Zur Frage des prognostischen Wertes der Senzitization response und Radiation response beim Kollumkarzinom nach Graham. Neoplasma 1963; 10: 533
   Google Scholar
• Smolka H., Soost H. J. Grundriss und Atlas der gynäkologischen Cytodiagnostik. Georg Thieme, Stuttgart 1956; 130
   Google Scholar
• Wahi P. N., Gupta K. Effect of radiation on vaginal cytology in cervical carcinoma. Indian J. Med. Res. 1955; 43: 441
   Google Scholar
• Zerne S. R. M., McLean Morris J. Prognostic significance of cytologic response in radiation of gynecologic cancer. Obstet. and Gynec. 1962; 19: 145
   Google Scholar