Microdosimetric Description of Beam Quality and Biological Effectiveness in Radiation Therapy

References

• Lind BK, Brahme A. Optimization of radiation therapy dose distributions using scanned electron and photon beams and multileaf collimators. Proc. 9th Int. Conf. on Computers in Radiation Therapy. Elsevier, 1987: 235–9.
   Google Scholar
• Blakely EA, Tobias CA, Yang TCH, Smith KC, Lyman JT. Inactivation of human kidney cells by high-energy mono-energetic heavy-ion beams. Radiat Res 1979; 80: 122–60.
   Google Scholar
• Ito A, Henkelman RM. Microdosimetry of the pion beam at TRIUMF. Radiat Res 1980; 82: 413–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindborg L, Brahme A. Influence of microdosimetric quanti-ties on observed dose-response relationships in radiation ther-apy. Radiat Res 1990; 124: 23–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson B, Montelius A, Andreo P. A study of interface effects in 'Co beams using a thin-walled parallel plate ioniza-tion chamber. Med Phys 1992; 19: 1413–21.
   Google Scholar
• Kellerer AM, Chmelevsky D. Criteria for the applicability of LET. Radiat Res 1975; 63: 226–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodhead DT, Nikjoo H. Track structure analysis of ultra-soft X-rays compared to high- and low-LET radiations. Int J Radiat Biol 1989; 55: 513–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilikidis A, Brahme A, Lindborg L. Microdosimetry in the build-up region of gamma ray beams. Radiat Prot Dos 1990; 31: 227–33.
   Google Scholar
• Tilikidis A, lacobaeus C, Brahme A. Microdosimetric meas-urements in the build-up region of very pure high-energy photon and electron beams. Phys Med Biol 1993; 38: 765–84.
   Google Scholar
• Tilikidis A. Skog S, Brahme A. Influence of radiation quality changes on microdosimetric variance and dose-response rela-tions. Radiat Prot Dos 1994; 52: 43–9.
   Google Scholar
• Grinborg JE, Lindborg L, Tilikidis A, Falk R. Dosimetry around hot particles with microdosimetric techniques. Radiat Prot Dos 1990; 31: 389–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makrigiorgos G, Adelstein SJ, Kasis AI. Auger electron emit-ters: Insights gained from in vitro experiments. Radiat Envi-ron Biophys 1990; 29: 75–91.
   Google Scholar
• Pettersson 0-A. Boron neutron capture therapy. Binding of boron compounds to cultured cells and studies on therapeutic effects. (Dissertation) Uppsala University, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Frankenberg D, Frankenberg-Schwager M, Harbich R. The contribution of OH* in densely ionising electron track ends or particle tracks to the induction of DNA double strand breaks. Radiat Prot Dos 1990; 31: 249–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roots R, Chatterjee A, Chang P. Lammel L, Blakely E. Characterization of hydroxyl radical-induced damage after sparesely and densely ionizing radiation. Int J Radiat Biol 1985; 47: 157–66.
   Google Scholar
• Holley WR, Chatterjee A, Magee JL. Production of DNA strand breaks by direct effects of hevy charged particles. Radiat Res 1991; 121: 161–8.
   Google Scholar
• Holian J, Garisson WM. Reconstitution mechanisms in the radiolysis of aqueous biochemical systems: Inhibitive effects of thiols. Nature 1969; 221: 57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prise KM, Davies S, Michael BN. A comparison of the chemical repair rates of free radical precursors of DNA damage and cell killing in Chinese hamster V79 cells. Int J Radiat Biol 1992; 61: 721–8.
   Google Scholar
• Kallman P, Agren A, Brahme A. Tumour and normal tissue responses to fractionated non-uniform dose delivery. Int J Radiat Biol 1992; 62: 249–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todd P, Winchell SH, Feola JM, Jones GE. Pulsed high-in-tensity roentgen rays. Acta Radiol Ther Phys Biol 1968; 7: 22–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson H, Brahme A. Fundamentals of electron beam dosimetry. In: Florence CH, Chu FCH, Laughlin JS, eds. Proceedings of the symposium on electron beam therapy. New York: Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1981: 17–30.
   Google Scholar
• Hamm RN, Wright HA, Katz R, Turner JE, Ritchie RH. Calculated yields and slowing-down spectra for electrons in liquid water: Implications for electron and photon RBE. Phys. Med Biol 1978; 23: 1149–61.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt-Böcking H, Ramm U, Kraft G, et al. 6-electron emission in fast heavy ion atom collisions. Adv Space Res 1992; 12: 7–15.
   Google Scholar
• Kraft G, Kramer, Scholz M. LET, track structure and mod-els. Radiat Environ Biophys 1992; 31: 161–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankenberg D, Frankenberg-Schwager M, Blöcher D, Har-bich R. Evidence for DNA double-strand breaks as the criti-cal lesion in yeast cells irradiated with sparsely or densely ionising radiation under oxic or anoxic conditions. Radiat Res 1981; 88: 524–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross W, Dicello J, Colvett RD. The dosimetry and mi-crodosimetry of 5.7 GeV neon ions. In: Annual report on research project, Radiological Research Laboratory, Colum-bia University NY, 1974: 88–115 COO 3243–3, United States Atomic Energy Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Lind BK. Properties of an algorithm for solving the inverse problem in radiation therapy. Inverse Problems 1990; 6: 415–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngo FQH, Blakely E, Tobias C. Sequential exposures of mammalian cells to low- and high LET radiations. Radiat Res 1981; 87: 59–78.
   Google Scholar
• Suzuki S. Survival of Chinese hamster V79 cells after irradia-tion with a mixture of neutrons and 'Co 7 rays: experimental and theoretical analysis of mixed irradiation. Radiat Res 1993; 133: 327–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barendsen GW. Response of cultured cells, tumors and nor-mal tissues to radiations of different linear energy transfer. Curr Top Radiat Res 1968; 4: 295–356.
   Google Scholar
• Todd PW. Heavy ion irradiation of human and Chinese hamster cells in vitro. Radiat Res 1975; 61: 288–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellmann J, Rink H, Taucher-Scholz G, Kraft G. DNA strand break induction and rejoining and cellular recovery in mammalian cells after heavy-ion irradiation. Radiat Res 1993; 135: 46–55.
   Google Scholar
• Ward JF. DNA damage produced by ionizing radiation in mammalian cells: identities, mechanisms and repairability. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mal Biol 1988; 35: 95–125.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ward JF. The yield of DNA double-strand breaks produced intracellularly by ionizing radiation: a review. Int J Radiat Biol 1990; 57: 1141–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barendsen GW. Mechanisms of cell reproductive death and shapes of radiation dose-survival curves of mammalian cells. Int J Radiat Biol 1990; 57: 885–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodhead DT, Belli M, Mill AJ, et al. Direct comparison between protons and alpha-particles of the same LET: I. Irradiation methods and inactivation of asynchronous V79, HeLa and C3H1OT1/2 cells. Int J Radiat Biol 1992; 61: 611–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall EJ, Gross W, Dvorak RF, Kellerer AM, Rossi HH. Survival curves and age response functions for Chinese ham-ster cells exposed to X-rays or high LET alpha particles. Radiat Res 1972; 52: 88–98.
   Google Scholar
• Bird RP, Burki Hi. Survival of synchronised Chinese hamster cells exposed to radiation of different linear-energy transfer. Int J Radiat Biol 1975; 27: 105–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraft G. Radiobiological effects of very heavy ions: Inactiva-tion, induction of chromosome aberrations and strand breaks. Nuclear Science Applications 1987; 3: 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler JF. The linear quadratic formula and progress in fractionated radiotherapy. Br J Radiol 1989; 62: 679–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thames HD, Withers HR, Peters LJ, Fletcher GH. Changes in early and late radiation responses with altered dose frac-tionation: implication for dose survival relationship. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1982; 8: 219–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Withers HR. Biological basis for altered fractionation scheme. Cancer 1985; 55: 2086–95.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brahme A. Dosimetric precision requirements in radiation therapy. Acta Radiol Oncol 1984; 23: 379–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brahme A. Accuracy requirements and quality assurance of external beam therapy with photons and electrons. Acta Oncol 1988; (Suppl 1): 56–7.
   Google Scholar
• Kellerer AM. Fundamentals of microdosimetry. In: Kase, Bjärngard, Attix, eds. The dosimetry of ionizing radiation. Academic Press, 1985; 1: 77–162.
   Google Scholar
• Brahme A, Ágren AK. Optimal dose distribution for eradi-cation of heterogeneous tumors. Acta Oncol 1987; 26: 377–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentzen SM, Juul Christensen J, Overgaard J, Overgaard M. Some methodological problems in estimating radiobio-logical parameters from clinical data. Acta Oncol 1987; 27: 105–16.
   Google Scholar
• Turesson I, Thames HD. Repair capacity and kinetics of human skin during fractionated radiotherapy: erythema, desquamation and teleangiectasia after 3 and 5 year follow-up. Radiother Oncol 1989; 15: 169–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pihet P, Menzel HG, Schmidt R, Beauduin M, Wambersie A. Biological weighting function for RBE. Specification of neu-tron therapy beams. Intercomparison of 9 European centres. Radiat Prot Dos 1990; 31: 437–42.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson B. Electron contamination from different materials in high energy photon beams. Phys Med Biol 1985; 30: 139–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brahme A, Nafstadius P. Computed dosimetry of scanned electron and photon beams for radiation therapy. Med Phys 1984; 11: 381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ndfstadius P, Brahme A, Nordell B. Computer assisted dosimetry of scanned electron and photon beams for radia-tion therapy. Radiother Oncol 1984; 2: 261–9.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson B, Brahme A. Contamination of high-energy photon beams by scattered photons. Strahlentherapie 1981; 157: 181–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ahnesjö A, Andreo P. Determination of effective brems-strahlung spectra and electron contamination for photon dose calculations. Phys Med Biol 1989; 34: 1451–64.
   Google Scholar
• Andreo P, Brahme A. Stopping power data for high energy photon beams. Phys Med Biol 1986; 31: 839–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICRU. Specification of high activity gamma-ray sources. In-ternational Commission on Radiation Units and Measure-ments 1970; Report 18 ICRU, Washington DC.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers DWO, Ewart GM, Bielajew AF. Calculation of con-tamination of the 6°Co beam from the AECL therapy source. NRCC Report PXNR-2710 1985; Ottawa.
   Google Scholar
• Nordell B, Lindblom E, Montelius A. Energy and lineal energy distributions and absorbed dose components in a 50 MV photoneutron beam. In: Proc. of the Fourth Sympo-sium on Neutron Dosimetry. EUR-7448 Luxembourg CEC 1981; 2: 279–92.
   Google Scholar
• Gudowska I. Measurments of neutron radiation around med-ical electron accelerators by means of 235U chamber and indium foil activation. Radiat Prot Dos 1988; 23: 345–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manfredotti C, Nastasi U, Ornato E, Zanini A. Evaluation of the undesired neutron dose equivalent to critical organs in patients treated by linear accelerator gamma ray therapy. Radiat Prot Dos 1992; 44: 457–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brahme A, Hultén G, Svensson H. Electron depth absorbed dose distribution for a 10 MeV clinical microtron. Phys Med Biol 1975; 20: 39–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreo P, Brahme A, Nahum A, Mattsson 0. Influence of energy and angular spread on stopping-power ratios for elec-tron beams. Phys Med Biol 1989; 34: 751–68.
   Google Scholar
• Lax I, Brahme A. Collimation of high energy electron beams. Acta Radial Oncol 1980; 19: 199–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner BL. Dose perturbations at interfaces in photon beams: Annihilation radiation. Med Phys 1991; 18: 713–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lax I. Inhomogeneity corrections in electron-beam dose plan-ning. Limitations with the semi-infinite slab approximation. Phys Med Biol 1986; 31: 879–92.
   Google Scholar
• Shortt KR, Ross CK, Bielajew AF, Rogers DWO. Electron beam dose distributions near standard inhomogeneities. Phys Med Biol 1986; 31: 235–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson B, Montelius A. Fluence perturbation in photon beams under non equilibrium conditions. Med Phys 1986; 13: 191–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuchnir FT, Reft CS. Experimental determination of fluence perturbation factors for five parallel-plate ionization cham-bers. Med Phys 1993; 20: 331–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montelius A. Neutron dosimetry with detectors of finite size. I: theory. Acta Radial Oncol 1986; 25: 295–301.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nilsson B, Brahme A. Relation between kerma and absorbed dose in photon beams. Acta Radiol Oncol 1983; 22: 77–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magee JL, Chatterjee A. Theoretical aspects of radiation chemistry. In: Farnhataziz and Rodgers MAJ, eds. Radiation chemistry. Principles and applications 1987; 137–171, VCH Verlagsgesellschaft mbH.
   Google Scholar
• Paretzke HG. Radiation track structure theory. In: Freeman GR, ed. Kinetics of non-homogeneous processes. John Wiley & Sons 1987: 89–170.
   Google Scholar
• Kliauga P. Colvett RD, Goodman Li, Lam YMO Mi-crodosimetry of 400 MeV/AMU '2C and 450 MeV/AMU 40Ar beams. In: Proc. of the 6th symposium on microdosime-try 1978: 2: 1173–83 Harwood Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Söderström S, Gustafsson A, Brahme A. The clinical value of different treatment objectives and degrees of freedom in radia-tion therapy optimization. Radiother Oncol 1993; 29: 148–63.
   Google Scholar
• Tilikidis A, Lind B. Ndfstadius P. Brahme A. A microdosi-metric investigation on the biological effectiveness of 50 MV scanned bremsstrahlung beams. Int I Radiat Biol 1993, Sub-mitted.
   Google Scholar