How can young women be encouraged to attend cervical cancer screening? Suggestions from face-to-face and internet focus group discussions with 30-year-old women in Stockholm, Sweden

References

• Arbyn M, Dillner J. Review of current knowledge on HPV vaccination: An appendix to the European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Cervical Cancer Screening. J Clin Virol 2007;38:189–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancuck L, Patnick J, Vessey M. A cohort effect in cervical screening coverage? J Med Screen 2008;15:27–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrae B, Kemetli L, Sparen P, Silfverdal L, Strander B, Ryd W, . Screening-preventable cervical cancer risks: Evidence from a nationwide audit in Sweden. J Natl Cancer Inst 2008;100:622–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lockwood-Rayermann S. Characteristics of participation in cervical cancer screening. Cancer Nurs 2004;27:353–63.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arbyn M, Quataert P, Van Hal G, Van Oyen H. Cervical cancer screening in the Flemish region (Belgium): Measurement of the attendance rate by telephone interview. Eur J Cancer Prev 1997;6:389–98.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Webb R, Richardson J, Esmail A, Pickles A. Uptake for cervical screening by ethnicity and place-of-birth: A population-based cross-sectional study. J Public Health (Oxf) 2004;26:293–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonovsky A. Health, stress and coping. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne S. Healthcare avoidance. A critical review. Holist Nurs Pract 2008;22:280–92.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ackerson K, Preston S. A decision theory perspective on why women do or do not decide to have cancer screening: Systematic review. J Adv Nurs 2009;65:1130–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waller J, McCaffery K, Nazroo J, Wardle J. Making sense of information about HPV in cervical screening: A qualitative study. Br J Cancer 2005;92:265–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman AL, Shepeard H. Exploring the knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and communication preferences of the general public regarding HPV: Findings from CDC focus group research and implications for practice. Health Educ Behav 2007;34:471–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blomberg K, Widmark C, Ternestedt B-M, Törnberg S, Tishelman C. Between youth and adulthood: Focus group discussions with 30-year-old women about cervical cancer and its prevention in urban Sweden. Cancer Nurs. Forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• Kitzinger J, Barbour RS. Introduction: The challenge and promise of focus groups. Barbour R, Kitzinger J. Developing focus group research. Politics, theory and practice. London: Sage; 1999. 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Fern EF. Advanced focus group research. London: Sage; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Lagerlund M, Widmark C, Lambe M, Tishelman C. Rationales for attending or not attending mammography screening – a focus group study among women in Sweden. Eur J Cancer Prev 2001;10:429–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widmark C, Lagerlund M, Ahlberg BM, Tishelman, C. Cancer screening in the context of women's health: Perceptions of body and self among women of different ages in urban Sweden. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being 2008;3:89–102.
   Google Scholar
• Thorne S. Interpretive description. California: Left Coast Press; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Knops-Dullens T, de Vries N, de Vries H. Reasons for non-attendance in cervical cancer screening programmes: An application of the Integrated Model for Behavioural Change. Eur J Cancer Prev 2007;16:436–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillner J. Cervical cancer screening in Sweden. Eur J Cancer 2000;36:2255–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widmark C, Tishelman C, Lundgren E-L, Forss A, Sachs L, Törnberg S. Opportunities and burdens for nurse-midwives working in primary health care. J Nurse Midwifery 1998;43:530–40.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davies K. Capturing women's lives. A discussion of time and methodological issues. Womens Stud Int Forum 1996;19:579–88.
   Google Scholar
• Oscarsson MG, Benzein EG, Wijma BE. Reasons for non-attendance at cervical screening as reported by non-attendees in Sweden. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2008;29:23–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farley M, Golding JM, Minkoff JR. Is a history of trauma associated with a reduced likelihood of cervical cancer screening? J Fam Pract 2002;51:827–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forbes C, Jepson R, Martin-Hirsch P. Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002(3):CD002834.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen H, Svanholm H, Stoevring H, Bro F. A primary healthcare based intervention to improve a Danish cervical cancer screening program – a cluster randomised controlled trial. J Epidemiol Community Health 2009. Epub 2010 Feb 18. doi: 10.1136/jech.2008.077636.
   Google Scholar
• Eaker S, Adami HO, Granath F, Wilander E, Sparén P. A large population-based randomized controlled trial to increase attendance at screening for cervical cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2004;13:346–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson JO, Mullins RM, Siahpush M, Spittal MJ, Wakefield M. Mass media campaign improves cervical screening across all socio-economic groups. Health Educ Res 2009. Epub 2010 Apr 2. doi: 10.1093/her/cyp023.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oscarsson MG, Wijma BE, Benzein EG. Nonattendance in a cervical cancer screening program – what happens if women's requirements are met? Health Care Women Int 2008;29:183–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forss A, Tishelman C, Widmark C, Lundgren E-L, Sachs L, Törnberg S. ‘I got a letter…‘ a qualitative study of women's reasoning about attendance in a cervical cancer screening programme in urban Sweden. Psychooncology 2001;10:76–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duggal HV, Olowokure B, Caswell M, Wardle SA. Comparing the information experience of women invited for cervical screening for the first time in 1994 with 2001. Eur J Epidemiol 2004;19:433–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Waller J, Marlow LA, Wardle J. Anticipated shame and worry following an abnormal Pap test result: The impact of information about HPV. Prev Med 2009;48:415–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong N, Murphy E. Weaving meaning? An exploration of the interplay between lay and professional understandings of cervical cancer risk. Soc Sci Med 2008;67:1074–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar