Accurate prostate tumour detection with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: Dependence on histological properties

References

• Cellini N, Morganti AG, Mattiucci GC, Valentini V, Leone M, Luzi S, et al. Analysis of intraprostatic failures in patients treated with hormonal therapy and radiotherapy: Implications for conformal therapy planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2002;53:595–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickett B, Vigneault E, Kurhanewicz J, Verhey L, Roach M. Static field intensity modulation to treat a dominant intra-prostatic lesion to 90 Gy compared to seven field 3- dimensional radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1999;44:921–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh AK, Guion P, Sears-Crouse N, Ullman K, Smith S, Albert PS, et al. Simultaneous integrated boost of biopsy proven, MRI defined dominant intra-prostatic lesions to 95 Gray with IMRT: Early results of a phase I NCI study. Radiat Oncol 2007;2:36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed HU, Hindley RG, Dickinson L, Freeman A, Kirkham AP, Sahu M, et al. Focal therapy for localised unifocal and multifocal prostate cancer: A prospective development study. Lancet Oncol 2012;13:622–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Futterer JJ, Heijmink SW, Scheenen TW, Veltman J, Huisman HJ, Vos P, et al. Prostate cancer localization with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and proton MR spectroscopic imaging. Radiology 2006;241:449–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseinzadeh K, Schwarz SD. Endorectal diffusion-weighted imaging in prostate cancer to differentiate malignant and benign peripheral zone tissue. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004; 20:654–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groenendaal G, van den Berg CA, Korporaal JG, Philippens ME, Luijten PR, van Vulpen M, et al. Simultaneous MRI diffusion and perfusion imaging for tumor delineation in prostate cancer patients. Radiother Oncol 2010; 95:185–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groenendaal G, Borren A, Moman MR, Monninkhof E, van Diest PJ, Philippens ME, et al. Pathologic validation of a model based on diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for tumor delineation in the prostate peripheral zone. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012;82:e537–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu J, Humphrey PA, Kibel AS, Snyder AZ, Narra VR, Ackerman JJ, et al. Magnetic resonance diffusion characteristics of histologically defined prostate cancer in humans. Magn Reson Med 2009;61:842–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlemmer HP, Merkle J, Grobholz R, Jaeger T, Michel MS, Werner A, et al. Can pre-operative contrast-enhanced dynamic MR imaging for prostate cancer predict microvessel density in prostatectomy specimens?Eur Radiol 2004;14:309–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oto A, Yang C, Kayhan A, Tretiakova M, Antic T, Schmid-Tannwald C, et al. Diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of prostate cancer: Correlation of quantitative MR parameters with Gleason score and tumor angiogenesis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;197:1382–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langer DL, van der Kwast TH, Evans AJ, Sun L, Yaffe MJ, Trachtenberg J, et al. Intermixed normal tissue within prostate cancer: Effect on MR imaging measurements of apparent diffusion coefficient and T2-sparse versus dense cancers. Radiology 2008;249:900–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groenendaal G, Moman MR, Korporaal JG, van Diest PJ, van Vulpen M, Philippens ME, et al. Validation of functional imaging with pathology for tumor delineation in the prostate. Radiother Oncol 2010;94:145–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turkbey B, Pinto PA, Mani H, Bernardo M, Pang Y, McKinney YL, et al. Prostate cancer: Value of multiparametric MR imaging at 3 T for detection – histopathologic correlation. Radiology 2010;255:89–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenkrantz AB, Mendrinos S, Babb JS, Taneja SS. Prostate cancer foci detected on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging are histologically distinct from those not detected. J Urol 2012;187:2032–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentzen SM. Theragnostic imaging for radiation oncology: Dose-painting by numbers. Lancet Oncol 2005;6: 112–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb S, Nahum AE. A model for calculating tumour control probability in radiotherapy including the effects of inhomogeneous distributions of dose and clonogenic cell density. Phys Med Biol 1993;38:653–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mucci LA, Powolny A, Giovannucci E, Liao Z, Kenfield SA, Shen R, et al. Prospective study of prostate tumor angiogenesis and cancer-specific mortality in the health professionals follow-up study. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:5627–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langer DL, van der Kwast TH, Evans AJ, Plotkin A, Trachtenberg J, Wilson BC, et al. Prostate tissue composition and MR measurements: Investigating the relationships between ADC, T2, K(trans), v(e), and corresponding histologic features. Radiology 2010;255:485–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korporaal JG, van den Berg CA, van Osch MJ, Groenendaal G, van Vulpen M, van der Heide UA. Phase-based arterial input function measurements in the femoral arteries for quantification of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI and comparison with DCE-CT. Magn Reson Med 2011;66:1267–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson AW, Zhong J, Petroff OA, Szafer A, Ransom BR, Prichard JW, et al. Effects of osmotically driven cell volume changes on diffusion-weighted imaging of the rat optic nerve. Magn Reson Med 1996;35:162–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schabel MC, Parker DL. Uncertainty and bias in contrast concentration measurements using spoiled gradient echo pulse sequences. Phys Med Biol 2008;53:2345–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Bazelaire C, Rofsky NM, Duhamel G, Zhang J, Michaelson MD, George D, et al. Combined T2* and T1 measurements for improved perfusion and permeability studies in high field using dynamic contrast enhancement. Eur Radiol 2006;16:2083–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng HL, Wright GA. Rapid high-resolution T(1) mapping by variable flip angles: Accurate and precise measurements in the presence of radiofrequency field inhomogeneity. Magn Reson Med 2006;55:566–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts C, Little R, Watson Y, Zhao S, Buckley DL, Parker GJ. The effect of blood inflow and B(1)-field inhomogeneity on measurement of the arterial input function in axial 3D spoiled gradient echo dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Magn Reson Med 2011;65:108–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar