Preferences for potential innovations in non-invasive colorectal cancer screening: A labeled discrete choice experiment for a Dutch screening campaign

References

• Mandel JS, Bond JH, Church TR, Dale C, Snover G, Bradley M, et al. Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. N Engl J Med 1993; 328:1365–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winawer S, Fletcher R, Rex D, Bond J, Burt R, Ferrucci J, et al. Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: Clinical guidelines and rationale – Update based on new evidence. Gastroenterology 2003;124:544–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deutekom M, van Rijn AF, Dekker E, Blaauwgeers H, Stronks K, Fockens P, et al. Uptake of faecal occult blood-test colorectal cancer screening by different ethnic groups in the Netherlands. Eur J Public Health 2009;19:400–2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Rossum LG, van Rijn AF, Laheij RJ, Van Oijen MG, Fockens P, van Krieken HH, et al. Random comparison of guaiac and immunochemical fecal occult blood-tests for colorectal cancer in a screening population. Gastroenterology 2008;135:82–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkowitz Z, Hawkins NA, Peipins LA, White MC, Nadel MR. Beliefs, risk perceptions, and gaps in knowledge as barriers to colorectal cancer screening in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2008;56:307–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones RM, Woolf SH, Cunningham TD, Johnson RE, Krist AH, Rothemich SF, et al. The relative importance of patient-reported barriers to colorectal cancer screening. Am J Prev Med 2010;38:499–507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klabunde CN, Vernon SW, Nadel MR, Breen N, Seeff LC, Brown ML. Barriers to colorectal cancer screening. A comparison of reports from primary care physicians and average-risk adults. Med Care 2005;43:939–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosch LJW, Carvalho B, Fijneman RJA, Jimenez CR, Pinedo HM, van Engeland M, et al. Molecular tests for colorectal cancer screening. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2011;10:8–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensher DA, Rose JM, Greene WH. Applied choice analysis: A primer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan M, Gerard K, Amaya-Amaya M. Using discrete choice experiments to value health and health care (vol. 11). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• De Bekker-Grob EW, Ryan M, Gerard K. Discrete choice experiments in health economics: A review of the literature. Health Econ 2012;21:145–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bekker-Grob EW, Hol L, Donkers B, van Dam L, Habbema JDF, van Leerdam ME, et al. Labeled versus unlabeled discrete choice experiments in health economics: An application to colorectal cancer screening. Value Health 2010;13:315–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gyrd-Hansen G, Søgaard J. Analysing public preferences for cancer screening programmes. Health Econ 2001; 10:617–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawley ST, Volk RJ, Krishnamurthy P, Jibaja-Weiss M, Vernon SW, Kneuper S. Preferences for colorectal cancer screening among racially/ethnically diverse primary care patients. Med Care 2008;46:10–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hol L, de Bekker-Grob EW, van Dam L, Donkers B, Kuipers EJ, Habbema JDF, et al. Preferences for colorectal cancer screening strategies: A discrete choice experiment. Br J Cancer 2010;102:972–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard K, Salkeld G. Does attribute framing in discrete choice experiments influence willingness to pay?. Results from a discrete choice experiment in screening for colorectal cancer. Value Health 2009;12:354–63.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall DA, Reed Johnson F, Phillips KA, Marshall JK, Thabane L, Kulin NA. Measuring patient preferences for colorectal cancer screening using a choice-format survey. Value Health 2007;10:415–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall DA, Reed Johnson, F, Kulin NA, Özedmir S, Walsh JME, Marshall JK, et al. How do physician assessments of patient preferences for colorectal cancer screening tests differ from actual preferences? A comparison in Canada and the United States using a stated-choice survey. Health Econ 2009;18:1420–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nayaradou M, Berchi C, Dejardin O, Launoy G. Eliciting population preferences for mass colorectal cancer screening organization. Med Decis Making 2010;30:224–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan M, San Miguel F. Revisiting the axiom of completeness in health care. Health Econ 2003;12:295–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salkeld G, Solomon, M, Short L, Ryan M, Ward JE. Evidence-based consumer choice: A case study in colorectal cancer screening. Austr N Z J Public Health 2003;27: 449–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dam L, Hol L, de Bekker-Grob EW, Steyerberg EW, Kuipers EJ, Habbema JDF, et al. What determines individuals’ preferences for colorectal cancer screening programmes?. A discrete choice experiment. Eur J Cancer 2010;46:150–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkins D, Eccles M, Flottorp S, Guyatt GH, Henry D, Hill S, Liberati A, et al. Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: Critical appraisal of existing approaches. The GRADE working Group. BMC Health Serv Res 2004;4:38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall DA, McGregor ES, Currie G. Measuring preferences for colorectal cancer screening. What are the implications for moving forward? Patient 2010;3: 79–89.
   Google Scholar
• Goede SL, van Roon AH, Reijerink JC, van Vuuren AJ, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Habbema JD, et al. Cost-effectiveness of one versus two sample faecal immunochemical testing for colorectal cancer screening. Gut 2013;62:727–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benning TM, Dirksen CD, Dellaert BGC, Severens JL. Measuring consumers’ preferences for colorectal cancer screening tests in The Netherlands. Unpublished observations.
   Google Scholar
• Bech M, Kjaer T, Lauridsen J. Does the number of choice sets matter?. Results from a web survey applying a discrete choice experiment. Health Econ 2011;20:273–86.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Akiva M, Bradley M, Morikawa T, Benjamin J, Novak T, Oppewal H, et al. Combining revealed and stated preferences data. Market Lett 1994;5:335–49.
   Google Scholar
• Salkeld G, Ryan M, Short L. The veil of experience: Do consumers prefer what they know best?. Health Econ 2000;9:267–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar