Advanced search
Publication Cover
Acta Oncologica Volume 54, 2015 - Issue 4
Journal homepage
1,115
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Letter

Multi-modality optimisation in radiotherapy treatment planning using composite objective values

Kristoffer PeterssonDepartment of Medical Radiation Physics, Clinical Sciences, Lund, Lund University, Lund, SwedenCorrespondence[email protected]
,
Per NilssonDepartment of Medical Radiation Physics, Clinical Sciences, Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden;Department of Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital and Lund University, Lund, Sweden
,
Per EngströmDepartment of Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital and Lund University, Lund, Sweden
,
Tommy KnöösDepartment of Medical Radiation Physics, Clinical Sciences, Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden;Department of Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital and Lund University, Lund, Sweden
&
Crister CebergDepartment of Medical Radiation Physics, Clinical Sciences, Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
Pages 557-561 | Received 16 May 2014, Accepted 16 Jul 2014, Published online: 22 Mar 2015

References

  • Breedveld S, Storchi PR, Voet PW, Heijmen BJ. iCycle: Integrated, multicriterial beam angle, and profile optimization for generation of coplanar and noncoplanar IMRT plans. Med Phys 2012;39:951–63.
  • Craft DL, Hong TS, Shih HA, Bortfeld TR. Improved planning time and plan quality through multicriteria optimization for intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012;82:e83–90.
  • Petersson K, Ceberg C, Engström P, Benedek H, Nilsson P, Knöös T. Conversion of helical tomotherapy plans to step-and-shoot IMRT plans – Pareto front evaluation of plans from a new treatment planning system. Med Phys 2011;38:3130–8.
  • Petersson K, Engellau J, Nilsson P, Engstrom P, Knoos T, Ceberg C. Treatment plan comparison using grading analysis based on clinical judgment. Acta Oncol 2013;52:645–51.
  • Haas O. Radiotherapy treatment planning: New system approaches. (Advances in industrial control). Grimble MJ, Johnson MA, editors. London: Springer-Verlag London Ltd.; 1999.
  • RayStation 3.5 User Manual. RaySearch Laboratories AB, 2013.
  • Weiss E, Siebers JV, Keall PJ. An analysis of 6-MV versus 18-MV photon energy plans for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) of lung cancer. Radiother Oncol 2007;82:55–62.
  • Suh Y, Weiss E, Zhong H, Fatyga M, Siebers JV, Keall PJ. A deliverable four-dimensional intensity-modulated radiation therapy-planning method for dynamic multileaf collimator tumor tracking delivery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008;71:1526–36.
  • Multi criteria optimization in RayStation. Stockholm: RaySearch Laboratories AB; 2012.
  • Båth M, Månsson LG. Visual grading characteristics (VGC) analysis: A non-parametric rank-invariant statistical method for image quality evaluation. Br J Radiol 2007;80:169–76.
  • Knöös T, Benedek H, Ceberg C, Nilsson P, Petersson K. Uncertainties in the evaluation of treatment plans. In: Palta JR, Mackie TR, editors. Uncertainties in external beam radiation therapy: AAPM Medical Physics Monograph No 35 Madison, WI: Medical Physics Publishing; 2011. p. 117–27.
  • Oliver M, Ansbacher W, Beckham WA. Comparing planning time, delivery time and plan quality for IMRT, RapidArc and Tomotherapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2009;10:3068.
  • Pasquier D, Cavillon F, Lacornerie T, Touzeau C, Tresch E, Lartigau E. A dosimetric comparison of tomotherapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy in the treatment of high-risk prostate cancer with pelvic nodal radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2013;85: 549–54.
  • Ottosson RO, Engstrom PE, Sjostrom D, Behrens CF, Karlsson A, Knoos T, et al. The feasibility of using Pareto fronts for comparison of treatment planning systems and delivery techniques. Acta Oncol 2009;48:233–7.
  • Thor M, Benedek H, Knoos T, Engstrom P, Behrens CF, Hauer AK, et al. Introducing multiple treatment plan-based comparison to investigate the performance of gantry angle optimisation (GAO) in IMRT for head and neck cancer. Acta Oncol 2012;51:743–51.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.