Pharyngoplasty after primary repair of clefts of the secondary palate

References

• Haapanen ML. Effect of method of cleft palate repair on the quality of speech at the age of 6 years. Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery 1995;29:245–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaRossa D. The state of the art in cleft palate surgery. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2000;37:225–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Persson C, Elander A, Lohmander–Agerskov A, Söderpalm E. Speech outcomes in isolated cleft palate: impact of cleft extent and additional malformations. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2002;39:397–408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulkkinen J, Haapanen ML, Paaso M, Laitinen J, Ranta R. Velopharyngeal function from the age of three to eight years in cleft palate patients. Folia Phoniatr Logop 2001;53:93–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park S, Saso Y, Ito O, The outcome of long-term follow-up after palatoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000;105:12–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vedung S. Pharyngeal flaps after one- and two-stage repair of the cleft palate: a 25-year review of 520 patients. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1995;32:206–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunnegård K, Lohmander A. A cross-sectional study of speech in 10-year-old children with cleft palate: results and issues of rater reliability. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2007;44:33–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Buys Roessingh AS, Cherpillod J, Trichet-Zbinden C, Hohlfeld J. Speech outcome after cranial-based pharyngeal flap in children born with total cleft, cleft palate, or primary velopharyngeal insufficiency. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006;64:1736–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marrinan EM, LaBrie RA, Mulliken JB. Velopharyngeal function in nonsyndromic cleft palate: relevance of surgical technique, age at repair, and cleft type. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1998;35:95–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker M, Svensson H, Sarnäs KV, Jacobsson S. Von Langenbeck or Wardill procedures for primary palatal repair in patients with isolated cleft palate – speech results. Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery 2000;34:27–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaRossa D, Jackson OH, Kirschner RE, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia modification of the Furlow double-opposing z-palatoplasty: long-term speech and growth results. Clin Plast Surg 2004;31:243–9.
   Google Scholar
• Timmons MJ, Wyatt RA, Murphy T. Speech after repair of isolated cleft palate and cleft lip and palate. Br J Plast Surg 2001;54:377–84.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lohmander-Agerskov A, Havstam C, Söderpalm E. Assessment of speech in children after repair of isolated cleft palate. Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery 1993;27:307–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haapanen ML, Rintala AE. Comparison of quality of speech after Veau-Wardill-Kilner pushback operation and the Cronin modification in the primary treatment of cleft palate. Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery 1993;27:113–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haapanen ML, Rantala SL. Correlation between the age at repair and speech outcome in patients with isolated cleft palate. Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery 1992;26:71–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myklebust O, Åbyholm FE. Speech results in CLP patients operated on with a von Langenbeck palatal closure. Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery 1989;23:71–4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Witt PD, Myckatyn T, Marsh JL, Grames LM, Dowton SB. Need for velopharyngeal management following palatoplasty: an outcome analysis of syndromic and nonsyndromic patients with Robin sequence. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997;99:1522–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris HL, Wroblewski SK, Brown CK, Van Demark DR. Velar-pharyngeal status in cleft palate patients with expected adenoidal involution. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1990;99:432–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mazaheri M, Athanasiou AE, Long RE Jr. Comparison of velopharyngeal growth patterns between cleft lip and/or palate patients requiring or not requiring pharyngeal flap surgery. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1994;31:452–60.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rintala AE, Haapanen ML. The correlation between training and skill of the surgeon and reoperation rate for persistent cleft palate speech. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995;33:295–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Witt PD, Wahlen JC, Marsh JL, Grames LM, Pilgram TK. The effect of surgeon experience on velopharyngeal functional outcome following palatoplasty: is there a learning curve?. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;102:1375–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McWilliams BJ, Randall P, LaRossa D, Speech characteristics associated with the Furlow palatoplasty as compared with other surgical techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996;98:610–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh JL, Grames LM, Holtman B. Intravelar veloplasty: a prospective study. Cleft Palate J 1989;26:46–50.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jensen BL, Kreiborg S, Dahl E, Fogh-Andersen P. Cleft lip and palate in Denmark, 1976–1981: epidemiology, variability, and early somatic development. Cleft Palate J 1988;25:258–69.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Åbyholm F, D'Antonio L, Davidson Ward SL, Pharyngeal flap and sphincterplasty for velopharyngeal insufficiency have equal outcome at 1 year postoperatively: results of a randomized trial. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2005;42:501–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar