The Early Ingrowth of an Autogenous Bone Inlay into an Artificial Defect in the Rabbit Mandibula

References

• Abbott L. C., Schottstaedt E. R., Saunders J. B., De C. M., Bost F. C. The evaluation of cortical and cancellous bone as grafting material. A clinical and experimental study. Bone Joint Surg 1947; 29: 381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrektsson B. Repair of diaphyseal defects. Experimental studies on the role of bone grafts in reconstruction of circumferential defects in long bones. Diss. University of Göteborg. 1971
   Google Scholar
• Alonso M. R., Bailey B. J. Reconstruction of the mandible. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1972; 5: 501
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arora B. K., Laskin D. M. Sex chromatin as a cellular label of osteogenesis by bone grafts. J Bone Joint Surg 1964; 46A: 1269
   Google Scholar
• Axhausen G. Die Histologischen und Klinischen Gesetze der Freien Osteoplastik auf Grund von Thierversuchen. Arch Klin Chir 1908; 88: 23
   Google Scholar
• Bell W. H. Current concepts of bone grafting. J Oral Surg 1968; 26: 118
   Google Scholar
• Blocker T. G., Weiss L. R. Use of cancellous bone in the repair of defects about the jaws. Ann Surg 1946; 123: 622
   Google Scholar
• Bloom W. A note on osteogenesis by myeloid reticular cells. J Infect Dis 1960; 107: 11
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bromberg B. E., Song I. C., Craig G. T. Splitrib mandibular reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1972; 50: 357
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brånemark P.-I., Lindström J., Hallén O., Breine U., Jeppson P.-H., Öhman A. Reconstruction of the defective mandible. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1975; 9: 116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burwell R. G. Studies in the transplantation of bone. VII. The fresh composite homograft-autograft of cancellous bone. An analysis of factors leading to osteogenesis in marrow transplants and in marrow-containing bone grafts. J Bone Joint Surg 1964; 46B: 110
   Google Scholar
• Campbell C. J., Brower T., MacFadden D. G., Payne E. B., Doherty J. D. Experimental study of the fate of bone grafts. J Bone Joint Surg 1953; 35 A: 332
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coutelier L. Un nouveau marqueur fluorescent de l'ostéogenèse: l'hématoporphyrine. Rev Belge Pathol 1964; 30: 369
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Danckwardt-Lillieström G. Reaming of the medullary cavity and its effect on diaphyseal bone. A fluorochromic, microangiographic and histologic study on the rabbit tibia and dog femur. Acta Orthop Scand (Suppl.) 1969; 128.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Danckwardt-Lillieström G., Lorenzi G. L., Olerud S. Intramedullary nailing after reaming. Acta Orthop Scand (Suppl.) 1970; 134.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Duhamel H. L. Sur le dévelopment et la crue des os des animaux. Mem Acad Sci 1742; 55: 354
   Google Scholar
• Eger W., Gattow G., Kämmerer H. Störung der Mineralisation und Knochenneubildung. Res Prog 1967; 4: 175
   Google Scholar
• Eger W., Kämmerer H. On the regeneration of bone tissue examined with tetracycline in transparent bone sections. Symp Biol Hung 1967; 7: 179
   Google Scholar
• Eloesser L. Rib grafting operations for the repair of bone defects and their end-results. Arch Surg 1920; 1: 428
   Google Scholar
• Engdahl E. Bone regeneration in maxillary defects. An experimental investigation on the significance of the periosteum and various media (blood, surgicel, bone marrow and bone grafts) on bone formation and maxillary growth. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1972, Suppl. 8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fergusson A. B., Laing P. G., Grebner M., Madancy L. Study of revascularization of autogenous cortical bone grafts in rabbit using radiophosphorus. Arch Surg 1959; 78: 551
   Google Scholar
• Frost H. M. Measurement of human bone formation by means of tetracycline labelling. Can J Biochem 1963; 41: 31
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haldeman K. O. The influence of periosteum of the survival of bone grafts. J Bone Joint Surg 1933; 15: 302
   Google Scholar
• Hansson L. I. Daily growth in length of diaphysis measured by oxytetracycline in rabbit normally and after medullary plugging. Acta Orthop Scand (Suppl.) 1967; 101.
   Google Scholar
• Harding R. L. Mandibular replacements. J Oral Surg 1970; 28: 593
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heipie K. G., Chase S. W., Herndon C. H. A comparative study of the healing process following different types of bone transplantation. J Bone Joint Surg 1963; 45 A: 1593
   Google Scholar
• Hulth A., Olerud S. Tetracycline labelling of growing bone. Acta Soc Med Ups 1962; 67: 219
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kelly P. J., Jowsey J., Riggs B. L. A comparison of different morphologic methods of determining bone formation. Clin Orthop 1965; 40: 7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Küntscher G. Callus ohne Knochenbruch. Zentralbl Chir 1941; 68: 857
   Google Scholar
• Lacroix P. The organization of bones, S. Gilder. J. & A. Churchill Ltd., London 1951, (transl. )
   Google Scholar
• Longacre J. J., DeStefano G. A. Further observations of the behavior of autogenous split-rib grafts in reconstruction of extensive defects of the cranium and face. Plast Reconstr Surg 1957; 20: 281
   Google Scholar
• Holmstrand K. Biophysical investigations of bone transplants and bone implants. An experimental study. Acta Orthop Scand (Suppl.) 1957; 26., Merrem: Animadversiones quaedam chirurgicae experimentes in animalibus factus illurstratae. Giessae 1810. Cited from
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Milch R. A., Rall D. P., Tobie J. E. Bone localization of the tetracyclines. J Natl Cancer Inst 1957; 19: 87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mowlem R. Cancellous chip bone-grafts. Report on 75 cases. Lancet 1944; ii: 746
   Google Scholar
• Nathanson A. The early vascularization of an autogenous bone inlay into an artificial defect in the rabbit mandibula. Acta Otolaryngot, (Stockh) 1978; 85., In print
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Olerud S., Lorenzi G. L. Triple fluorochrome labelling in bone formation and bone resorption. J Bone Joint Surg 1970; 52 A: 274
   Google Scholar
• Ollier M. Traité expérimental et clinique de la régénération des os et de la production artificielle du tissu osseux. V. Masson et Fils, Paris 1867
   Google Scholar
• Peer L. A. The fate of autogenous human bone grafts. Br J Plast Surg 1951; 3: 233
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pfeiffer C. A. Development of bone from transplanted marrow in mice. Anat Rec 1948; 102: 225
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Phemister D. B. The fate of transplanted bone and regenerative power of its various constituents. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1914; 19: 303
   Google Scholar
• Puranen J. Reorganization of fresh and preserved bone transplants. An experimental study in rabbits using tetracycline labelling. Acta Orthop Scand (Suppl.) 1966; 92.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds F. C., Oliver D. R. Experimental evaluation of homogenous bone grafts. J Bone Joint Surg 1950; 32 A: 283
   Google Scholar
• Ritsilä V., Alhopuro S., Rintala A. Bone formation with free periosteum. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1972; 6: 51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki H. K., Matthews A. Two-colour fluorescent labelling of mineralizing tissues with tetracycline and 2.4-bis (N,N'-di-(carbomethyl)2.4-bis aminomethyl) fluorescein. Stain Technol 1966; 41: 57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson N., Casson J. A. Experimental onlay bone grafts to the jaws. A preliminary study in dogs. Plast Reconstr Surg 1970; 46: 341
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Urist M. R., McLean F. C. Osteogenetic potency and new-bone formation by induction in transplants to the anterior chamber of the eye. J Bone Joint Surg 1952; 34 A: 443
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson-Jones R. Fractures and joint injuries, 3rd ed. E. & S. Livingstone Ltd., Edinburgh 1946
   Google Scholar
• Zucman J., Maurer P., Berbesson C. The effect of autografts of bone and periosteum in recent diaphysial fractures. An experimental study in the rabbit. J Bone Joint Surg 1968; 50 B: 409
   Google Scholar