One-Stage Closure of Isolated Cleft Palate with the Veau-Wardill-Kilner V to Y Pushback Procedure or the Cronin Modification: II. Height, Weight and Comparison of Dental Arches

References

• Athanasiou A E, Mazaheri M, Zarrinia K. Frequency of crossbite in surgically treated cleft lip and/or palate children. J Pedod 1986; 10: 340–351
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Athanasiou A E, Mazaheri M, Zarrinia K. Longitudinal study of the dental arch dimensions in hard and soft palate clefts. J Pedod 1987; 12: 35–47
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• BMDP, Biomedical programs Data Package Statistical Software. WJ Dixon, ed. University of California Press, Berkeley 1990
   Google Scholar
• Brauer R O. Push-back repair of the cleft palate with nasal mucosal flaps to prevent late contracture; Follow-up results of the Cronin procedure. Plast Reconstr Surg 1965; 36: 529–537
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cronin T D. Method of preventing raw area of the nasal surface of soft palate in push-back surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 1957; 20: 474–481
   Google Scholar
• Dahl E. Craniofacial morphology in congenital clefts of the lip and palate. Acta Odontol Scand 1970; 28, Suppl 57
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dahl E, Hanusardöttir B, Bergland O. A comparison of occlusions in two groups of children whose clefts were repaired by three different surgical procedures. Cleft Palate J 1981; 17: 122–127
   Google Scholar
• Day D W. Accurate diagnosis and assessment of growth in patients with orofacial clefting. Birth Defects 1985; 21: 1–14
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Geier M, Dahlman H. Unterschiede im Wachstum und Entwicklung zwischen Spaltträgern und Nichtspaltträgern. Fortschr Kieferorthop 1988; 49: 444–453
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heliövaara A, Rintala A, Ranta R. One-stage closure of isolated cleft palate with the Veau-Wardill-Kilner V to Y pushback procedure or the Cronin modification I. Comparison of operative results. Scand J Plast Reconstr Hand Surg 1993; 27: 49–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellquist R, Pontén B, Skoog T. The influence of cleft length and palatoplasty on the dental arch and the deciduous occlusion in cases of clefts of the secondary palate. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1978; 12: 45–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsson O P. Repair of isolated cleft palate. A comparison of one- and two-stage surgery by dental arch measurements, cephalometry, and speech analysis. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. 1990, Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Medicine 236
   Google Scholar
• Jensen B L, Dahl E, Kreiborg S. Longitudinal study of body height, radius length and skeletal maturity in Danish boys with cleft lip and palate. Scand J Dent Res 1983; 91: 473–481
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jonsson B, Thilander B. Occlusion, arch dimensions, and craniofacial development after palatal surgery in a group of children with clefts of the secondary palate. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1979; 13: 305–326
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Menius J A, Largent M D, Vincent C J. Skeletal development of cleft palate children as determined by hand-wrist roentgenographs: A preliminary study. Cleft Palate J 1966; 3: 67–75
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moorrees C FA. The dentition of the growing child. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA 1959
   Google Scholar
• Moorrees C FA, Grön A-M, Lebret L ML, Yen P KJ, Fröhlich F J. Growth studies of the dentition: A review. Am J Orthod 1969; 55: 600–616
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nyström M, Ranta R. Sizes of dental arches and interdental space in 3-year-old children with and without cleft lip/palate. Eur J Orthod 1989; 11: 82–88
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyström M, Ranta R. Effect of timing and method of cleft palate repair on dental arches at the age of three years. Cleft Palate J 1990; 27: 349–352
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nyström M, Ranta R, Kataja M. Sizes of dental arches and general body growth up to 6 years of age in children with isolated cleft palate. Scand J Dent Res 1992; 100: 123–129
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Palmer C R, Hamlen M, Ross R B, Lindsay W K. Cleft palate repair: Comparison of the results of two surgical techniques. Can J Surg 1969; 12: 32–39
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Procházková J, Tolarová M. Craniofacial morphological features in parents of children with isolated cleft palate. Acta Chir Plast 1986; 28: 194–204
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ranta R, Oikari T, Haataja J. Prevalence of crossbite in deciduous and mixed dentition in Finnish children with operated cleft palate. Proc Finn Dent Soc 1974; 70: 20–24
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ranta R, Stegars T, Rintala A. Correlations of hypodontia in children with isolated cleft palate-Cleft. PalateJ 1983; 20: 163–165
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ranta R. A review of tooth formation in children with cleft lip/palate. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1986; 90: 11–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roche A F, Davila G H. Late adolescent growth in stature. Pediatrics 1972; 50: 874–880
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross R B, Johnston M C. Cleft lip and palate. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore 1972
   Google Scholar
• Sorva R, Perheentupa J, Tolppanen E-M. A novel format for a growth chart. Acta Paediatr Scand 1984; 73: 527–529
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorva R, Tolppanen E-M, Lankinen S, Perheentupa J. Growth evaluation: Parent and child specific height standards. Arch Dis Child 1989; 64: 1483–1487
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Swanson L T, MacCollum D W, Richardson S O. Evaluation of the dental problems in the cleft palate patients. Am J Orthod 1956; 42: 749–765
   Google Scholar
• Wada T, Mizokawa N, Miyazaki T, Ergen G. Maxillary dental arch growth in different types of cleft. Cleft Palate J 1984; 21: 180–192
   PubMedGoogle Scholar