Acute erosions of the gastric mucosa in burned rats: effect of sucralfate

References

• Borrero E, Ciervo J, Chang J B. Antacid vs sucralfate in preventing acute gastrointestinal tract bleeding in abdominal aortic surgery. Arch Surg 1986; 121: 810–812
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bresalier R S, Grendell J H, Cello J P, Meyer A A. Sucralfate suspension versus titrated antacid for the prevention of acute stress-related gastrointestinal haemorrhage in critically ill patients. Am J Med 1987; 83(suppl 3B)110–116
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Czaja A J, McAlhany J C, Pruitt B A. Acute gastroduodenal disease after thermal injury. N Engl J Med 1974; 291: 926–929
   Google Scholar
• Chen B W, Hiu W M, Lam S K, Cho C H, Ng M MT, Luk C T. Effects of sucralfate on gastric mucosal blood flow in rats. Gut 1989; 30: 1544–1551
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crampton J R, Gibbons L C, Rees W D. Stimulation of amphibian gastroduodenal bicarbonate secretion by sucralfate and aluminium: role of local prostaglandin metabolism. Gut 1988; 29: 903–908
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craven D E, Kunches L M, Kilinsky V, Lichtenberg D A, Make B J, McCabe W R. Risk factors for pneumonia and fatality in patients receiving continuous mechanical ventilation. Am Rev Respir Dis 1986; 133: 792–796
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon W J, Brown M B, Engelman L. BMDP statistical software. University of California Press, Berkeley 1983
   Google Scholar
• Editorial. Stress ulcer prophylaxis in critically ill patients. Lancet 1989; 334(ii)1255–1256
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson J L, Merril G F, Miller H I, Spitzer J J. Regional blood flow redistribution during early burn shock in the guinea pig. Circ Shock 1977; 4: 317–326
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Flenker H. Irreversible thermic shock in rats; methods and results of a standardized shock model. J Int Med Res 1981; 9: 21–30
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Folkman J, Szabo S, Stovroff M, McNeeil P, Li W, Shing Y. Duodenal ulcer. Discovery of a new mechanism and development of angiogenetic therapy that accelerates healing. Ann Surg 1991; 214: 414–425
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folkman J, Szabo S, Shing Y. Sucralfate affinity for fibroblast growth factor. J Cell Biol 1990; 111: 223a
   Google Scholar
• Garvey B, McCambley J A, Tuxen D V. Effects of gastric alkalization on bacterial colonization in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 1989; 17: 216–221
   Google Scholar
• Grosnbech J E, Matre K, Stangeland L, Svanes K, Varhaug J E. Gastric mucosal repair in the cat: role of the hyperemic response to mucosal damage. Gastroenterology 1988; 95: 311–320
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guttu K, Sosrbye H, Gislason H, Svanes K, Grosnbech J E. Role of bicarbonate in blood flow—mediated protection and repair of damaged gastric mucosa in the cat. Gastroenterology 1994; 107: 149–159
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Herndon D N, Wilmore D W, Mason A D. Development and analysis of a small animal model simulating the human postburn hypermetabolic response. J Surg Res 1978; 25: 394–403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyman M A, Payne B D, Hoffman J IE, Rudolph A M. Blood flow measurements with radio-nuclide-labelled particles. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1977; 20: 55–79
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollander D, Tarnawski A, Gergely H, et al. Sucralfate protection of the gastric mucosa against ethanol-induced injury: a prostaglandin-mediated process?. Scand J Gastroenterol 1984; 19: 97–102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hui W M, Chen B W, Cho C H, Luk C T, Lam S K. Role of gastric mucosal blood flow in cyto-protection. Digestion 1991; 48: 113–120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiviluto T, Grosnbeck J E, Kivilaasko E, Lund T, Pitkänen J, Svanes K. Acute gastric mucosal lesions, haemodynamic and microcirculatory changes in the thermally injured rat. Burns 1989; 15: 365–370
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kivilaasko E, Fromm D, Silen W. Relationship between ulceration and intramural pH of gastric mucosa during haemorrhagic shock. Surgery 1978; 84: 70–78
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Konturek S J, Radecki T, Piastucki I, Brzozowski T, Drozdowicz D. Gastroenterology by colloidal bismith subcitrate (De-Nol) and Sucralfate. Role of endogenous prostaglandins. Gut 1987; 28: 201–205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konturek S J, Brzozowski T, Bielanski W, et al. Epidermal growth factor in the gastroprotective and ulcer-healing action of sucralfate in rats. Am J Med 1989; 86: 32–37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laggner A N, Lenz K, Base W, Druml W, Schneeweiss B, Grimm G. Prevention of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in long-term ventilated patients. Sulfate versus ranitidine. Am J Med 1989; 88(suppl 6A)81–84
   Google Scholar
• Lee S S, Girod C, Valla D, Geoffroy P, Lerec D. Effect of pentobarbital sodium anesthesia on splanchninc haemodynamics of normal and portal-hypertensive rats. Am J Physiol 1985; 249: G528–G532
   Google Scholar
• Miller E D, Kistner J R, Epstein R M. Whole-body distribution of radioactively labelled micro-spheres in the rat during anesthesia with halothane, enflurane, or ketamine. Anesthesiology 1980; 52: 296–302
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Okabe S, Ogihara Y, Koba H. Effect of sucralfate on experimental ulcers. Sucralfate: From basic science to the bedside, D Hollander, G NJ Tytgat. Plenum Press, New York 1995; 197–207
   Google Scholar
• Paimela H, Goddard P J, Carter K, et al. Restitution of frog gastric mucosa in vitro: Effect of basic fibroblast growth factor. Gastroenterology 1993; 104: 1337–1345
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pruitt J A, Goodwin C W, Jr. Stress ulcer in the burned patient. World J Surg 1981; 5: 209–222
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rees W DW. Mechanisms of gastroduodenal protection by sucralfate. Am J Med 1991; 91: 58–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie W P, Shearburn E W. Influence of iso-proterenol and cholestyratnine on acute gastric mucosal ulcerogenesis. Gastroenterology 1977; 73: 62–65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samloff I M, O'Dell C. Inhibition of peptic activity by sucralfate. Am J Med 1985; 79(suppl 2C)15–18
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Segadal L, Svanes K. Evaluation of the microsphere method for determination of cardiac output. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1979; 39: 415–421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shorrock C J, Garner A, Hunter A H, Crampton J R, Rees W DW. Effect of bismith subcitrate and sucralfate on gastroduodenal and human gastric bicarbonate secretion in vivo. Gut 1990; 31: 26–31
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Skolleborg K C, Grosnbech J E, Grong K, Åbyholm F E, Lekven J. Distribution of cardiac output during pentobarbital versus midazolam/fentanyl/fluanisone anaesthesia in the rat. Lab Animal 1990; 24: 221–227
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Skolleborg K C, Grosnbech J E, Åbyholm F E, Svanes K, Lekven J. Acute erosions of the gastric mucosa in burned rats: effect of gastric acidity and fluid replacement. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1990; 24: 185–192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slomany B L, Piolrowski J, Tamura S, Slomany A. Enhancement of the protective qualities of gastric mucus by sucralfate: role of phosphoinositides. Am J Med 1991; 91(suppl 2A)30S–36S
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Slomany B L, Piotrowski J, Obazaki K, Grzelinska E, Slomany A. Nature of the enhancement of the protective qualities of gastric mucus by sucraifate. Digestion 1989; 44: 222–231
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tarnawski A, Hollander D, Stachura J, et al. Prostaglandin protection of the gastric mucosa against alcohol injury, a dynamic time related process. The role of the mucosal proliferative zone. Gasteroenterology 1985; 89: 366–374
   Google Scholar
• Tryba N. Risk of acute stress Weeding and nosokomial pneumonia in ventilated intensive care unit patients: sucralfate versus antacids. Am J Med 1987; 83: 117–124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker L A, Buscemi-Bergin M, Gellai M. Renal hemodynamics in conscious rats: effects of anesthesia, surgery, and recovery. Am J Physiol 1983; 245: F67–F74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar