Personality and experimentally simulated hearing loss

References

• Aplin D. Y., Rowson V. J. Psychological characteristics of children with functional hearing losses, In preparation
   Google Scholar
• Berger K. Non-organic hearing loss in children. Laryngoscope 1965; 75: 447–457
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brockman S. J., Hoversten G. H. Pseudoneural hypacusis in children. Laryngoscope 1960; 70: 825–839
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Campanelli P. A. Simulated hearinglosses in school children following identification audiometry. Journal of Auditory Research 1963; 3: 91–108
   Google Scholar
• Chaiklin J. B., Ventry I. M. Functional hearing loss. Modern Developments in Audiology, J. Jerger. Academic Press, New York 1963
   Google Scholar
• Cherry R., Ventry I. M. The ascending-descending gap: a tool for identifying a suprathreshold response. Journal of Auditory Research 1976; 16: 281–287
   Google Scholar
• Coles R. R. A., Markides A., Priede V. M. Uses and abuses of speech audiometry. Disorders of Auditory Function, W. Taylor. Academic Press, London 1973; Vol. 1
   Google Scholar
• Dixon R. F., Newby H. A. Children with nonorganic hearing problems. Archives of Otolaryngology 1959; 70: 619–623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eysenck H. J. The Structure of Human Personality. Methuen, London 1970
   Google Scholar
• Eysenck H. J., Eysenck S. B. G. Manual of the Eysenck Personality Inventory. Hodder and Stoughton, Sevenoaks, Kent 1964
   Google Scholar
• Harris D. A. A rapid and simple technique for the detection of non-organic hearing loss. Archives of Otolaryngology 1958; 68: 758–760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson K. O., Work W. P., McCoy G. Functional deafness. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 1956; 65: 154–170
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kane J. M. Audiometric Evaluation of Experimentally Simulated Hearing Loss. University of Manchester. 1984, Unpublished M.Sc. Dissertation
   Google Scholar
• Kinstler D. B. Functional hearing loss. Handbook of Speech Pathology and Audiology, L. E. Travis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey 1971
   Google Scholar
• Martin F. N. Evaluation of pseudohypacusis. Handbook of Clinical Audiology2nd edn., J. Katz. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore 1978
   Google Scholar
• Monro D. A., Martin F. N. Effects of sophistication on four tests for non-organic hearing loss. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1977; 42: 528–534
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Noble W. G. Assessment of Impaired Hearing. Academic Press, New York 1978
   Google Scholar
• Nolan M., Tucker I. Functional hearing loss in children. Journal of the British Association of Teachers of the Deaf 1981; 5(1)2–10
   Google Scholar
• Reed G. F., Francis T. R. Drive, personality and audiometric response consistency. Perceptual and Motor Skills 1962; 15: 681–682
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rintelmann W., Harford E. The detection and assessment of pseudohypoacusis among school-age children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1963; 28: 141–152
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith S. L. Extraversion and sensory threshold. Psychophysiology 1968; 5: 293–299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens S. D. G. Auditory threshold variance signal detection theory and personality. International Audiology 1969; 8: 131–137
   Google Scholar
• Stephens S. D. G. Personality and the slope of loudness function. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1970; 22: 9–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens S. D. G. Some Individual Factors Influencing Audiometric Performance. Occupational Hearing Loss, D. W. Robinson. Academic Press, London 1971a
   Google Scholar
• Stephens S. D. G. The value of personality tests in relation to diagnostic problems of sensori-neural hearing loss. Sound 1971b; 5: 73–77
   Google Scholar
• Stephens S. D. G. Some Personality Factors Influencing Hearing. Disorders of Auditory Function, W. Taylor. Academic Press, London 1973
   Google Scholar
• Ventry I. M., Trier T., Chaiklin J. B. Factors related to persistence and resolution of functional hearing loss. Journal of Auditory Research 1965; 5: 231–240
   Google Scholar