125
Views
62
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

The Four Alternative Auditory Feature test (FAAF)—linguistic and psychometric properties of the material with normative data in noise

&
Pages 165-174 | Received 29 Jan 1987, Published online: 12 Oct 2009

References

  • Boothroyd A. Developments in speech audiometry. Sound 1968; 2: 3–10
  • Coltheart M. The MRC psycholinguistic database. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1981; 33A: 497–505
  • Denes F. B. On the statistics of spoken English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1963; 35: 892–904
  • Dillon H. The effect of test difficulty on the sensitivity of speech discrimination tests. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1983; 73: 336–344
  • Elliott L. L., Clifton L. A. B., Servi D. G. Word-frequency effects for a closed-set word-identification task. Audiology 1983; 22: 229 240.
  • Fairbanks G. Test of phonemic differentiation: the rhyme test. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1958; 30: 596–600
  • Foster J. R., Haggard M. P. FAAF—an efficient analytical test of speech perception. Proceedings of the Institute of Acoustics 1979; 9–12
  • Foster J. R., Haggard M. P. Introduction and Test Manual for FAAF II. MRC Institute of Hearing Research. 1984, Report Series B No. 11
  • Foster J. R., Haggard M. P. The four alternative auditory feature test—a general-purpose test with multiple special-purpose applications and sub-scores. Proceedings of the Institute of Acoustics 1986; 8: 167–174
  • Haggard M. P., Lindblad A. C., Foster J. R. Psychoacoustical and audiometric prediction of auditory disability for different frequency responses at listener-adjusted presentation levels. Audiology 1986; 25: 277–298
  • Haggard M. P., Mattingly I. G. A simple program for synthesising British English. IEEE Transactions on Audio and Electro-acoustics 1968; 16: 95–99, AU
  • Hood J. D., Poole J. P. Improving Unreliability of speech audiometry. British Journal of Audiology 1977; 11: 93–101
  • Kreul E. J., Nixon J.C, Kryter K. D., Bell D. W., Lang J. S. A proposed clinical test of speech discrimination. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1968; 11: 536–552
  • Miller G. A., Nicely P. An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1955; 27: 338–352
  • Plomp R., Mimpen A. M. Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. Audiology 1979; 18: 43 52.
  • Trinder J. R. Hardware-Software Configuration far High-performance Digital Filtering in Real Time. Proceedings of the IEEE ICASSP-82 No. 2. Piseataway, New Jersey 1982
  • Tyler R. S., Summerfield A. Q., Wood E. J., Fernandes M. Psychoacoustic and phonetic temporal processing in normal and hearing-impaired listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1982; 72: 740–752
  • Walker G., Byrne D., Dillon H. Learning effects with a closed response set nonsense syllable test. Australian Journal of Audiology 1982; 4: 27–31
  • Webster J. C. Word-frequency effects in modified rhyme test responses. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1984; 75 (Suppl. 1): S84.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.