References
- British Standards Institution. Hearing aids. Part 0. Methods for measurement of electroacoustical characteristics. British Standards Institution, London 1984
- Byrne D. Effects of frequency response characteristics on speech discrimination and preceived intelligibility and pleasantness of speech for hearing-impaired listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1986; 80: (2) 494–504.
- Foster J. R., Haggard M. P. The Four Alternative Auditory Feature Test (FAAF)—linguistic and psychometric properties of the material with normative data in noise. British Journal of Audiology 1987; 21: 165–174
- Hagerman B., Gabrielsson A. Questionnaires on desirable properties of hearing aids. Scandinavian Audiology 1985; 14: 109–111
- Harford E. P., Fox J. The use of high-pass amplification for broad-frequency sensorineural hearing loss. Audiology 1978; 17: 10–26
- Harrowven R. G. C, Greener J. D. F., Stephens S. D. G. A double blind cross-over study of high-frequency emphasis hearing aids in individuals with noise-induced hearing loss. British Journal of Audiology 1987; 21: 209–220
- Jerger J., Thelin J. Effects of electroacoustical characteristics of hearing aids on speech understanding. Bulletin of Prosthetic Research 1968; II: 159–197
- Killion M. C. Earmould plumbing for wideband hearing aids. Industrial Research Products, Inc., Elk Grove Village, Illinois, USA 1976, Technical Report 17
- Killion M. C. Earmould options for wideband hearing aids. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1981; 46: 10–20
- Lawton B. W., Cafarelli D. L. The effects of hearing aid frequency response modification upon speech reception. Institute of Sound and Vibration Research, Southampton University, England 1978, Memorandum No. 588
- Lutman M. E., Clark J. Speech identification under simulated hearing-aid frequency response characteristics in relation to sensitivity, frequency resolution and temporal resolution. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1986; 80: 1030–1040
- Pascoe D. P. Frequency responses of hearing aids and their effects on speech reception of hearing impaired subjects. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 1975; 84, (Suppl. 23)
- Pederson B. Venting of earmoulds with acoustic horn. Scandinavian Audiology 1984; 13: 205–206
- Punch J. L., Beck L. B. Relative effects of low frequency amplification on syllable recognition and speech quality. Ear and Hearing 1986; 7: 57–62
- Thompson G., Lassman F. Listener preference for selective versus flat amplification in a high frequency hearing-loss population. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1970; 13: 667–672