Perceptual consequence of vents in hearing aids

References

• American National Standards Institute. Specifications for audiometers. (ANSI 53, 6-1969), ANSI, New York 1969
   Google Scholar
• Cox R. Combined effects of ear mould vents and sub oscillatory feedback on hearing aid frequency response. Ear and Hearing 1981; 3: 12–17
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox R. M., Alexander G. C. Acoustic versus electronic modifications of hearing aid low-frequency output. Ear and Hearing 1983; 4: 190–196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis R., Green S. The influence of controlled venting on discrimination ability. Hearing Aid Journal 1974; 6: 34–38
   Google Scholar
• Gatehouse S. Limitations on insertion gains with vented ear moulds imposed by oscillatory feedback. British Journal of Audiology 1989; 23: 133–136
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grossman F. M. Acoustic sound filtration in hearing aids. Archives of Otolaryngology 1943; 38: 101–112
   Google Scholar
• Grossman F. M., Molloy C. T. Acoustic sound filtration and hearing aids. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1944; 16: 52–59
   Google Scholar
• Grover B. C., Martin M. C. On the practical limit for postural hearing aids. British Journal of Audiology 1974; 8: 121–124
   Google Scholar
• Grover B. C., Martin M. C. Physical and subjective correlates of ear mould occlusion. Audiology 1979; 18: 335–350
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hodgson W. R., Murdock C. Effect of the ear mould on speech intelligibility in hearing aid use. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1970; 13: 290–297
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Humes L. An evaluation of several rationales for selecting hearing aid gain. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1986; 51: 272–281
   Google Scholar
• Killion M. C. Transducers, ear moulds and sound quality considerations. The Vanderbilt Hearing-aid Report: State of the Art—Research Needs, G. Studebaker, F. Bess. Monographs in Contemporary Audiology, Upper Darby, PA 1982; 104–111
   Google Scholar
• Killion M. C, Wilber L. A., Gudmundsen G. I. Zwislocki was right. Hearing Instruments 1988; 39: 14–18
   Google Scholar
• Kuk F. K. Preferred insertion gain of hearing aids in listening and reading-aloud situations. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1990; 33: 520–529
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Levitt H., Collins M. J., Dubno J. R., Resnick S. B., White R. E. C. Development of a Protocol for the Prescriptive Fitting of a Wearable Master Hearing Aid. CSL Research Report No. 11 of the City University of New York, 1978
   Google Scholar
• Libby R. Commentary on: hearing aid selection for severe-to-profound hearing loss with additional observations on mild-to-moderate loss. Hearing Journal 1988; 41: 24–25
   Google Scholar
• Lybarger S. F. Controlling hearing aid performance by ear mould design. Auditory and Hearing Prosthetics Research, V. D. Larson, D. P. Egolf, R. L. Kirlin, S. W. Stile. Grune & Stratton, Inc, New York 1979; 101–132
   Google Scholar
• MacKenzie K., Browning G. G., McClymont L. G. Relationship between ear mould venting, comfort and feedback. British Journal of Audiology 1989; 23: 335–337
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McClellan M. Aided speech discrimination in noise with vented and unvested ear moulds. Journal of Auditory Research 1967; 7: 93–99
   Google Scholar
• McDonald F. D., Studebaker G. A. Ear mold alteration effects as measured in the human auditory meatus. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1970; 48: 1366–1372
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Neuman A. C, Levitt H., Mills R., Schwander T. An evaluation of three adaptive hearing aid selection strategies. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1987; 82: 1967–1976
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Northern J. L., Hattler K. W. Earmould influence on aided speech identification tasks. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1970; 13: 162–172
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Revoile S. Speech discrimination ability with ear inserts. Bulletin of Prosthetics Research, Fall 1968; 198–205
   Google Scholar
• Sandlin R. E., Andersen H. H. Development of a remote-controlled, programmable hearing system. Hearing Instruments 1989; 40: 33–36, 60
   Google Scholar
• Staab W. J., Nunley J. A. A guide to tube fitting of hearing aids. Hearing Aid Journal 1982; 35: 25–34
   Google Scholar
• Studebaker G. A. A 'rationalized' arcsine transform. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1985; 28: 455–462
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Studebaker G. A., Zachman T. A. Investigation of the acoustics of earmold vents. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1969; 47: 1107–1115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Studebaker G. A., Cox R. Side-branch and parallel vent effects in real ears and in acoustical and electrical models. Journal of the American Audiological Society 1977; 3: 108–116
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tonndorf J. Bone conduction. Foundations of Modern Auditory Theory, J. V. Tobias. Academic Press, New York and London 1972; 195–238
   Google Scholar
• Wimmer V. H. The occlusion effect from earmoulds. Hearing Instruments 1986; 37: 19, 58
   Google Scholar