Frequency selectivity as a potential measure of noise damage susceptibility

References

• Bonding P. Critical bands in patients with hearing loss due to salicilate. Abstracts of the 13th International Congress of Audiology, FirenzeItaly, 1976, 42
   Google Scholar
• De Boer E. Measurement of critical bandwidth in cases of perception deafness. Proceedings of the Third International Congress of Audiology. Elsevier Press, Amsterdam 1960; 100: 102
   Google Scholar
• De Boer E., Boumeester J. Critical bands and sensorineural hearing loss. Audiology 1974; 13: 236–259
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Psychophysics and Physiology of Hearing, E. F. Evans, J. P. Wilson. Academic Press, London 1977
   Google Scholar
• Florentine M., Buus S., Scharf B., Zwicker E. Frequency selectivity in normally hearing and hearing-impaired observers. J Speech Hear Res 1980; 23: 646–669
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Glasberg B. R., Moore B. C. J. Auditory filter shapes in subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear impairments. J Acoust Soc Am 1986; 79: 1020–1033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall J. W., Tyler R. S., Fernandes M. A. Factors influencing the masking level difference in cochlear hearing impaired and normal-hearing listeners. J Speech Hear Res 1984; 27: 145–154
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harrison R. U. The evaluation of cochlear frequency analysis in the clinic. Revue de Laryngologie 1982; 103: 405–410
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoekstra A., Ritsma R. J. Perceptive hearing loss and frequency selectivity. Psychophysics and Physiology of Hearing, E. F. Evans, J. P. Wilson. Academic Press, London 1977; 263–271
   Google Scholar
• Kryter K. D. Damage risk criterion and contours based on permanent and temporary hearing loss data. Journal of the American Industrial Hygiene Association 1965; 26: 34–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kryter K. D. The Effects of Noise on Man (2nd edn). Academic Press, New York 1985
   Google Scholar
• Levitt H. Transformed up-down methods in psycho-acoustics. J Acoust Soc Am 1971; 49: 469–77
   Google Scholar
• Margolis R. H., Goldberg S. M. Auditory frequency selectivity in normal and presbyacusic subjects. J Speech Hear Res 1980; 23: 603–613
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Michael P. L., Bienvenue G. R. Industrial noise in man. The Physical Environment at Work, D. J. Oborne, M. Gruncberg. John Wiley and Sons, New York 1983
   Google Scholar
• Moore B. C. J. Psychophysical tuning curves measured in simultaneous and forward masking. J Acoust Soc Am 1978; 63: 524–532
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B. C. J. Distribution of auditory-filter band-widths at 2 kHz in young normal listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 1987; 81: 1633–1635
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B. C. J., Glasberg B. R. Auditory filter shapes derived in simultaneous and forward masking. J Acoust Soc Am 1981; 70: 1003–1014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B. C. J., Peters R. W., Glasberg B. R. Auditory filter shapes at low frequencies. J Acoust Soc Am 1990; 88: 132–140
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson R. D. Auditory filter shape. J Acoust Soc Am 1974; 55: 802–809
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson R. D. Auditory filter shapes derived with noise stimuli. J Acoust Soc Am 1976; 59: 640–654
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson R. D., Nimmo-Smith I., Weber D. L., Milroy R. The deterioration of hearing with age: frequency selectivity, the critical ratio, the audiogram and speech threshold. J Acoust Soc Am 1982; 72: 1788–1803
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pick G. F. Level dependency of psychophysical frequency resolution and auditory filter shape. J Acoust Soc Am 1980; 68: 1085–1095
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pick G. F., Evans E. F., Wilson J. P. Frequency resolution in patients with hearing loss of eochlear origin. Psychophysics and Physiology of Hearing, E. F. Evans, J. P. Wilson. Academic Press, London 1977; 273–281
   Google Scholar
• Royster L. H., Thomas W. G. Age effect on hearing levels for a white nonindustrial noise exposed population (NINEP) and their use in evaluating industrial hearing conservation programs. Journal of the American Industrial Hygiene Association 1979; 40: 504–511
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shailer M. J., Moore B. C. J., Glasberg B. R., Watson N., Harris S. Auditory filter shapes at 8 and 10 kHz. J Acoust Soc Am 1990; 88: 141–148
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler R. S., Fernandes M., Wood E. J. Masking, temporal integration and speech intelligibility in individuals with noise-induced hearing loss. Disorders of Auditory Function, I. G. Taylor, A. Markides. Academic Press, London 1980; 211–236
   Google Scholar
• Ward W. D. Temporary threshold shift in males and females. J Acoust Soc Am 1966; 40: 478–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward W. D., Cushing E. M., Burns E. M. Effective quiet and moderate TTS: implications for noise exposure standards. J Acoust Soc Am 1976; 59: 160–165
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West P. D. B., Evans E. F. Early detection of hearing damage in young listeners resulting from exposure to amplified music. Br J Audiol 1990; 24: 89–103
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wightman F., McGee T., Kramer M. Factors influencing frequency selectivity in normal and hearing impaired listeners. Psychophysics and Physiology of Hearing, E. F. Evans, J. P. Wilson. Academic Press, London 1977; 295–306
   Google Scholar