Lip-reading the BKB sentence lists: Corrections for list and practice effects

References

• Aitkin M., Anderson D., Francis B., Hinde J. Statistical Modelling in GLIM. Clarendon Press, Oxford 1989
   Google Scholar
• Bamford J., Wilson I. Methodological considerations and practical aspects of the BKB Sentence Lists. Speech-hearing Tests and the Spoken Language of Hearing-impaired Children, J. Bench, J. Bamford. Academic Press, London 1979; 147–87
   Google Scholar
• Bamford J. M., Wilson I. M., Atkinson D., Bench J. Pure tone audiograms from hearing-impaired children. II. Predicting speech-hearing from the audiogram. Br J Audiol 1981; 15: 3–10
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Speech-hearing Tests and the Spoken Language of Hearing-impaired Children, J. Bench, J. Bamford. Academic Press, London 1979
   Google Scholar
• Bench J., Bamford J. M., Wilson I. M., Clifft L. A comparison of the BKB sentence lists for children with other speech audiometry tests. Aust J Audiol 1979a; 1: 61–6
   Google Scholar
• Bench J., Doyle J. The Bamford-Kowal-Bench/Au-stralian Version (BKB/A) Standard Sentence Lists. Lincoln Institute, Carlton, Victoria 1979
   Google Scholar
• Bench J., Doyle J., Greenwood K. M. A standardisation of the BKB/A sentence test for children in comparison with the NAL-CID sentence test and the CAP-PBM word test. Aust J Audiol 1987; 9: 39–48
   Google Scholar
• Bench J., Kowal A., Bamford J. The BKB (Bamford-Kowal-Bench) sentence lists for partially-hearing children. Br J Audiol 1979b; 13: 108–12
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Day G. A., Browning G. G., Gatehouse S. An audiovisual test of hearing disability using free-field sentences in noise. Br J Audiol 1988a; 22: 179–82
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Day G. A., Browning G. G., Gatehouse S. Benefit from binaural hearing aids in individuals with a severe hearing impairment. Br J Audiol 1988b; 22: 273–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• EPI. The Bamford-Kowal-Bench (BKB) standard sentence lists, female speaker, Lists 1 to 11 and Lists 12 to 21 (video recordings). External Pattern Input Group, Department of Phonetics and Linguistics, University College London. 1986
   Google Scholar
• Fourcin A. J., Abberton E. First applications of a new laryngograph. Medical and Biological Illustration 1971; 21: 172–82
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gatehouse S., Gordon J. Response times to speech stimuli as measures of benefit from amplification. Br J Audiol 1990; 24: 63–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Green R. The uses and misuses of speech audiometry in rehabilitation. Speech Audiometry, M. Martin. Taylor and Francis, London 1987; 129–53
   Google Scholar
• Hagerman B. Sentences for testing speech intelligibility in noise. Scand Audiol 1982; 11: 79–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurence R. F., Moore B. C. J., Glasberg B. R. A comparison of behind-the-ear high-fidelity linear hearing aids and two-channel compression aids, in the laboratory and in everyday life. Br J Audiol 1983; 17: 31–48
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MacLeod A., Summerfield Q. Quantifying the contribution of vision to speech perception in noise. Br J Audiol 1987; 21: 131–41
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MacLeod A., Summerfield Q. A procedure for measuring auditory and audio-visual speech-reception thresholds for sentences in noise: rationale, evaluation, and recommendations for use. Br J Audiol 1990; 24: 29–43
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McGrath M., Summerfield Q. Inter modal timing relations and audio-visual speech recognition by normal-hearing adults. J Acoust Soc Am 1985; 77: 678–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B. C. J., Laurence R. F., Wright D. Improvements in speech intelligibility in quiet and in noise produced by two-channel compression hearing aids. Br J Audiol 1985; 19: 175–87
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nelder J. A., Wedderburn R. W. M. Generalized linear models. J R Statist Soc 1972; 135: 370–84
   Google Scholar
• The Generalised Linear Interactive Modelling System Release 3.77 Manual, C. D. Payne. Numerical Algorithms Group, Oxford 1985
   Google Scholar
• Pearce J. L. BKB sentence lists — contextual analysis and reduction of redundancy by masking. M.Sc. Dissertation. Institute of Sound and Vibration Research, Southampton University. 1980
   Google Scholar
• Pearce J. L., Coles R. R. A. A contextual analysis of BKB (ST) sentence lists. Aust J Audiol 1980; 2: 63–9
   Google Scholar
• Plomp R., Mimpen A. M. Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. Audiology 1979; 18: 43–52
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosen S., Corcoran T. A video-recorded test of lip-reading for British English. Br J Audiol 1982; 16: 245–54
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schaie K. W., Zelinski E. Psychometric assessment of dysfunction in learning and memory. Brain Function in Old Age, F. Hoffmeister, C. Müller. Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1979; 134–50
   Google Scholar
• Tyler R. S. Speech perception by children. Cochlear Implants: Audiological Foundations, R. S. Tyler. Whurr, San Diego 1993; 191–256
   Google Scholar