Organic thresholds and functional components in experimentally simulated exaggerated hearing loss

References

• Aplin D. Y., Kane J. M. Variables affecting pure tone and speech audiometry in experimentally simulated hearing loss. Br J Audiol 1985a; 19: 219–28
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aplin D. Y., Kane J. M. Personality and experimentally simulated hearing loss. Br J Audiol 1985b; 19: 251–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• American Speech and Hearing Association (ASHA) Committee on Audiometric Evaluation. Guidelines for manual pure-tone threshold audiometry. ASHA 1978; 20: 297–301
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chaiklin J., Ventry J. Functional hearing loss. Modern Developments in Audiology, J. Jerger. Academic Press, New York 1963; 76–125
   Google Scholar
• Chaiklin J., Ventry I. M. Patient errors during spondee and pure tone threshold measurement. J Aud Res 1965; 5: 219–30
   Google Scholar
• Chaiklin J., Ventry I. M., Barrett L. S., Skalbeck G. S. Pure-tone threshold patterns observed in functional hearing loss. Laryngoscope 1959; 69: 1165–79
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cherry R., Ventry I. M. The ascending-descending gap: A tool for identifying a suprathrcshold response. J Aud Res 1976; 16: 281–7
   Google Scholar
• Coles R. R. A. Non-organic hearing loss. Butterworth's International Medical Reviews, A. G. Gibb, M. F. W. Smith. Butterworth, London 1982; 150–76
   Google Scholar
• Coles R. R. A., Mason S. M. The results of cortical electric response audiometry in medico-legal investigations. Br J Audiol 1984; 18: 71–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coles R. R. A., Priede V. M. Non-organic overlay in noise-induced hearing loss. Proc Royal Soc Med 1971; 64: 41–63
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Conn M., Ventry I. M., Woods R. Pure tone average and spondee threshold relationships in simulated hearing loss. J Aud Res 1972; 12: 234–9
   Google Scholar
• Gelfand S. A. Acoustic reflex threshold 10th percentiles and functional hearing impairment. 1993, (in submission)
   Google Scholar
• Gelfand S. A., Schwander T., Silman S. Acoustic reflex thresholds in normal and cochlear-impaired ears: Effects of no-response rates on 90th percentiles in a large sample. J Speech Hear Dis 1990; 55: 198–205
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gelfand S. A., Silman S. Functional hearing loss and its relationship to resolved hearing levels. Ear and Hear 1985; 6: 151–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelfand S. A., Silman S. Functional components and resolved thresholds in patients with unilateral functional impairments. Br J Audiol 1993; 27: 27–34
   Google Scholar
• Harris D. A. A rapid and simple technique for the detection of non-organic hearing loss. Arch Otolaryngol 1958; 68: 758–60
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkinson N. Functional hearing loss. Modern Developments in Audiology, Second Edition, J. Jerger. Academic Press, New York 1973; 175–210
   Google Scholar
• Kacker S. K. Bekesy audiometry in simulated hearing loss. J Speech Hear Dis 1971; 36: 506–10
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martin F. N., Monro D. A. The effects of sophistication on Type V Bekesy patterns in simulated hearing loss. J Speech Hear Dis 1975; 40: 508–13
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Monro D. A., Martin F. N. The effects of sophistication on four tests for non-organic hearing loss. J Speech Hear Dis 1977; 42: 528–34
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rintelmann W. F., Schwan S. A. Pseudohypacusis. Hearing Assessment, 2nd Edn, W. F. Rintelmann. Pro-Ed, Austin 1991; 603–52
   Google Scholar
• Silman S. The applicability of the modified bivariate plotting procedure to subjects with functional hearing loss. Scand Audiol 1988; 17: 125–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silman S., Gelfand S. A. The relationship between magnitude of hearing loss and acoustic reflex threshold levels. J Speech Hear Dis 1981; 46: 312–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Studebaker G. A. On masking in bone conduction testing. J Speech Hear Res 1962; 5: 215–27
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wiley T. L. Static acoustic-immittance measures in normal ears: A combined analysis for ears with and without notched tympanograms. J Speech Hear Res 1989; 32: 688
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wiley T. L., Oviatt D. L., Block M. C. Acoustic-immittance measures in normal ears. J Speech Hear Res 1987; 30: 161–70
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Winer B. J. Statistical Principles in Experimental Design. McGraw-Hill, New York 1971
   Google Scholar