Suppression tuning characteristics of 2f₁-f₂ distortion product otoacoustic emissions

References

• Brown A M, Kemp D T. Suppressibility of the 2F1-F2stimulated acoustic emissions in gerbil and man. Hear Res 1984; 13: 29–37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown A M. Continuous low level sound alters cochlear mechanics: an efferent effect. Hear Res 1988; 34: 27–38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cianfrone G, Mattia M. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions from normal human ears preliminary report. Cochlear mechanics and otoacoustic emissions, G Cianfrone, F. Grandori. Scand Audiol. 1985; 121–7, Suppl. 25
   Google Scholar
• Cianfrone G, Mattia M, Altissimi G, Turchetta R. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions and spontaneous otoacoustic emission suppression in humans. Advances in Audiology, F Grandori, G Cianfrone, DT. Kemp, 1990; 126–38
   Google Scholar
• Cianfrone G, Mattia M, Cervellini M, Musacchio A. Some effects of tonal fatiguing on spontaneous and distortion- product otoacoustic emissions. Br J Audiol 1993; 27: 123–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotton J C. Beats and combination tones at intervals between the unison and the octave. J Acoust Soc Am 1935; 7: 44–50
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein JL YS, Kiang N. Neural correlates of the aural combination tone 2F1-F2. Proceedings of the IEEE 1968; 56: 981–92
   Google Scholar
• Evans E F, Wilson J P. The frequency selectivity of the cochlea. Basic mechanisms in hearing, AR. Moller. Academic Press, London 1973; 519–54
   Google Scholar
• Geisler C D, Rhode W S, Kennedy D T. Responses to tonal stimuli of single auditory nerve fibers and their relationship to basilar membrane motion in the squirrel monkey. J Neurophysiol 1974; 37: 115672
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood D D. Combination bands of even order: masking effects and estimations of level of the difference bands (Fh-F1) and 2(Fh-F1). J Acoust Soc Am 1972; 52: 4, 1155–67
   Google Scholar
• Hall J L. Monaural phase effect: cancellation and reinforcement of distortion products F2-F1and 2F1-F2. J Acoust Soc Am 1972; 51: 6, 1872–81
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hall J L. Two-tone distortion products in a non-linear model of the basilar membrane. J Acoust Soc Am 1974; 56: 1818–28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris F P, Probst R, Xu L. Suppression of the 2F1-F2otoacoustic emission in humans. Hear Res 1992; 64: 133–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He N, Schmiedt R A. Fine structure of the 2f1-f2acoustic distortion product: changes with primary level. J Acoust Soc Am 1993; 94: 2659–69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp D T, Brown A M. An integrated view of cochlear mechanical nonlinearities observable from the ear canal. Mechanics of Hearing, E De Boer, MA Viergever. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague 1983; 000–000
   Google Scholar
• Khanna S M, Leonard D GB. Relationship between basilar membrane tuning and hair cell condition. Hear Res 1986; 23: 55–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiang N YS, Watanabe T, Thomas E C, Clark L F. Discharge patterns of single fibers in the cat’s auditory nerve. M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass: Res Monogr 1965; 35
   Google Scholar
• Koppl C, Manley G A. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in the bobtail lizard. II: Suppression tuning characteristics. J Acoust Soc Am 1993; 93: 2834–44
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasky R, Perlman J, Hecox K. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in human newborns and adults. Ear Hear 1992; 13: 6
   Google Scholar
• Manley G A, Koppl C.A. comparison of peripheral tuning measures: primary afferent tuning curves versus suppression tuning curves of spontaneous an distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. Auditory physiology and perception, Y Cazals, L Demany, K. Homer. Pergamon, Oxford 1992; 151–8
   Google Scholar
• Martin G K, Lonsbury-Martin B L, Probst R, Scheinin S A, Coats A C. Acoustic distortion products in rabbit ear canal. II. Sites of origin revealed by suppression contours and pure-tone exposures. Hear Res 1987; 28: 191–208
   Google Scholar
• Moulin A, Collet L, Morgon A. Influence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAE) on acoustic distortion product input/output functions: does the medial efferent system act differently in the vicinity of an SOAE. Acta Otolaryngol 1992; 112: 210–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Probst R, Hauser R. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normal and hearing-impaired ears. Am J Otolaryngol 1990; 11: 236–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhode W S. Some observations on two-tone interaction measured with the Mossbauer effect. Psycophysics and physiology of Hearing, EF Evans, JP. Wilson. Academic Press, London 1977; 27–38
   Google Scholar
• Rhode. WS. Some observations on cochlear mechanics. J Acous Soc Am 1978; 64: 15876
   Google Scholar
• Robles L, Ruggero M, Rich N. Mossbauer measurements of the mechanical response to single-tone and two-tone stimuli at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. Peripheral auditory mechanisms, JB Allen, J.L Hall, A Hubbard, ST Neely, A. Tubis. Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1986
   Google Scholar
• Roede J, Harris F P, Probst R, Xu L. Repeatability of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normally hearing humans. Audiology 1993; 32: 273–81
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sellick P M, Patuzzi R, Johnstone B M. Measurement of basilar membrane motion in the guinea pig using the Mossbauer technique. J Acoust Soc Am 1982; 72: 131–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shailer M J, Moore B CJ. Gap detection and the auditory filter. Phase effects using sinusoidal stimuli. J Acoust Soc Am 1987; 81: 1110–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smoorenburg G F. Audibility region of combination tones. J Acoust Soc Am 1972; 2: 603–12
   Google Scholar
• Smurzynski J, Leonard G, Kim D O, Lafreniere D C, Jung M D. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normal and impaired adult ears. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1990; 116: 1309–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiederhold M L, Mahoney J W, Kellogg D L. Acoustic overstimulation reduces 2f1-f2cochlear emissions at all levels in the cat. Peripheral Auditory Mechanisms, JB Allen, JL Hall, A Hubbard, ST Neely, A. Tubis. Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1986
   Google Scholar
• Wilson J P. The combination tone 2f1-f2in psy-chophysics and ear canal recording. Psychophysical, Physiological and Behavioural Studies. Proc. 5th Int. Symp. on Hearing, G Van den Brink, FA. Bilsen. Delft University Press, Delft 1980; 43–50
   Google Scholar