Does classroom amplification aid comprehension?

References

• Allen L, Anderson K. Marketing sound-field amplification systems. Sound-field FM Amplification Theory and Practical Applications, C. C. Crandell, J. J. Smaldino, C. Flexer. Singular Publishing, San Diego, CA 1995; 201–221
   Google Scholar
• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Position statement and guidelines for acoustics in educational settings. ASHA 1995; 37: 15–19
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berg F S. Facilitating Classroom Listening: A handbook for teachers of normal and hard of hearing students. Pro-Ed, Austin, TX 1987
   Google Scholar
• Berg F S. Acoustics and Sound Systems in Schools. Singular Publishing, San Diego, CA 1993
   Google Scholar
• Berg F S, Blair J C, Benson P V. Classroom acoustics: the problem, impact, and solution. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools 1996; 27: 16–20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bess F H. The minimally hearing-impaired child. Ear Hear 1985; 6: 43–47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crandell C. The effects of classroom acoustics on children with normal hearing: implications for intervention strategies. Educational Audiol-ogy Monographs 1991; 2: 18–38
   Google Scholar
• Crandell C. A comparison of commercially available frequency modulation sound field amplification systems. Educational Audiology Monograph 1993; 3: 15–20
   Google Scholar
• Crandell C. Effects of sound field FM amplification on the speech perception of ESL children. Educational Audiology Monograph 1996; 4: 1–5
   Google Scholar
• Dobie R, Berlin C. Influence of otitis media on hearing and development. Rhinol Laryngol 1979; 88: 48–53
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott C, Murray D J, Pearson L S. British Ability Scales. NFER, Windsor 1978
   Google Scholar
• Elliot L. Effects of noise on perception of speech by children and handicapped individuals. Sound and Vibration December, 9–14, 1982
   Google Scholar
• Elliot L L, Hammer M A, Shoul M E. Fine grained auditory discrimination in normal children and children with language-learning problems. J Speech Hear Res 1989; 32: 112–119
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Flexer C. Classroom public address systems. FM Auditory Training Systems: Characteristics, selection and use, M. Ross. York Press, Timonium, ML 1992
   Google Scholar
• Flexer C. Sound-Field FM systems: questions most often asked about classroom amplification. Hearsay 1997; 11: 5–14
   Google Scholar
• Flexer C, Millin J, Brown L. Children with developmental disabilities: the effects of sound field amplification on word identification. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools 1990; 21: 177–182
   Google Scholar
• Flexer C, Richards C, Buie C. Soundfield amplification for regular kindergarten and first grade classrooms: a longitudinal study of fluctuating hearing loss and pupil performance. Paper presented at the American Academy of Audiology Convention, Phoenix, AZ 1993
   Google Scholar
• Fintizo-Hieber T, Tillman T. Room acoustics effects on monosyllabic word discrimination ability by normal and hearing impaired children. J Speech Hear Res 1978; 21: 440–458
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Finitzo T. Classroom acoustics. Auditory Disorders in School Children (second edition), R. Roeser, M. Downs. Thième Medical, New York 1988; 221–223
   Google Scholar
• Gravel J, Wallace I. Listening and language at four years of age: effects of otitis media. J Speech Hear Res 1992; 21: 440–458
   Google Scholar
• Guidelines for Environmental Design in Schools. (Revision of Design Note 17). Building Bulletin 87. The Stationery Office, London 1997
   Google Scholar
• Ling D. On auditory learning. Newsounds 1986; 11: 57–64
   Google Scholar
• Masuda T, Ikeda Y, Manako H, Komiyami S. Analysis of vocal use: fluctuations in phonation time and intensity in four groups of speakers. Acta Otolaryngol 1993; 113: 547–552
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormick L, Schiefelbusch R. Early Language Intervention. Merrill Publishing, Columbus, OH 1984
   Google Scholar
• McSporran E. Towards better listening and learning in the classroom. Educational Rev 1997; 49: 102–111
   Google Scholar
• Mills M. A practical look at classroom amplification. Educational Audiology Monograph 1991; 2: 39–42
   Google Scholar
• Neale M D. Neale Analysis of Reading Ability: Revised British Edition (Reader). NFER-Nelson, Windsor 1988a
   Google Scholar
• Neale M D. Neale Analysis of Reading Ability: Revised British Edition (Manual). NFER-Nelson, Windsor 1988b
   Google Scholar
• Nober L, Nober E. Auditory discrimination for learning disabled children in quiet and classroom noise. J Learn Dis 1975; 8: 656–677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nozza R J. The binaural masking level difference in infants and adults: developmental changes in binaural hearing. Infant Behavior Dev 1987; 10: 105–110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer C V. Quantification of the ecobehavioral impact of a soundfield loudspeaker system in elementary classrooms. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1998; 41: 819–833
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raven J C. Progressive Matrices (Sets A, Ab, B). ET Heron & Co., London 1947
   Google Scholar
• Ray H, Sarff L S, Glassford F. Soundfield amplification: an innovative educational intervention for mainstreamed learning disabled students. The Directive Teacher 1984; 6: 18–20
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg G, Blake-Rahter P. Sound-field amplification: a review of the literature. Sound-field FM Amplification: Theory and practical applications, C. C. Crandall, J. J. Smaldino, C. Flexer. Singular Publishing, San Diego, CA 1995; 107–123
   Google Scholar
• Ross M, Brackett D, Maxon A. Assessment and Management of Mainstream Hearing-impaired Children. Pro-Ed, Austin, TX 1991
   Google Scholar
• Ross M. FM Auditory Training Systems: Characteristics, selection and use. York Press, Timonium, ML 1991
   Google Scholar