Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting: III. A general method for deriving initial fittings for hearing aids with multi-channel compression

References

• ANSI. ANSI S3.5–1997. American national standard methods for the calculation of the articulation index. American National Standards Institute, New York 1997
   Google Scholar
• Bentler R A, Pavlovic C V. Transfer functions and correction factors used in hearing aid evaluation and research. Ear Hear 1989; 10: 58–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkhard M D, Sachs R M. Anthropometric manikin for acoustic research. J Acoust Soc Am 1975; 58: 214–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne D, Dillon H, Tran K. An international comparison of long-term average speech spectra. J Acoust Soc Am 1994; 96: 2108–20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornelisse L E, Seewald R C. Field-to-microphone transfer functions for completely-in-the-canal (CIC) instruments. Ear Hear 1997; 18: 342–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornelisse L E, Seewald R C, Jamieson D G. The input/output formula: a theoretical approach to the fitting of personal amplification devices. J Acoust Soc Am 1995; 97: 1854–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasberg B R, Moore B CJ. Auditory filter shapes in subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear impairments. J Acoust Soc Am 1986; 79: 1020–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasberg B R, Moore B CJ. Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data. Hear Res 1990; 47: 103–38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goedegebure A, Hulshof M, Maas A JJ, Verschuure J. The effects of syllabic compression on speech intelligibility in hearing impaired. Psychoacoustics, Speech and Hearing Aids, B. Kollmeier. World Scientific, Singapore 1996; 165–70
   Google Scholar
• ISO 389–7. Acoustics—Reference zero for the calibration of audiometric equipment. Part 7: Reference threshold of hearing under free-field and diffuse-field listening conditions. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva 1996
   Google Scholar
• Moore B CJ. Signal processing to compensate for reduced dynamic range. Recent Developments in Hearing Instrument Technology, J. Beilin, G. R. Jensen. Stougaard Jensen, Copenhagen 1993; 147–65
   Google Scholar
• Moore B CJ. An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing (fourth edition). Academic, San Diego, CA 1997
   Google Scholar
• Moore B CJ. Cochlear Hearing Loss. Whurr, London 1998
   Google Scholar
• Moore B CJ, Alcantara J I, Glasberg B R. Development and evaluation of a procedure for fitting multi-channel compression hearing aids. Br J Audiol 1998; 32: 177–95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B CJ, Alcantara J I, Stone M A, Glasberg B R. Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting. II. Hearing aids with multi-channel compression. Br J Audiol 1999; 33: 99–113
   Google Scholar
• Moore B CJ, Glasberg B R. A comparison of four methods of implementing automatic gain control AGC) in hearing aids. Br J Audiol 1988; 22: 93–104
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore B CJ, Glasberg B R. A model of loudness perception applied to cochlear hearing loss. Auditory Neurosci 1997; 3: 289–311
   Google Scholar
• Moore B CJ, Glasberg B R. Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting. I. Linear hearing aids. Br J Audiol 1998; 32: 301–19
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore B CJ, Glasberg B R, Baer T. A model for the prediction of thresholds, loudness and partial loudness. J Audio Eng Soc 1997; 45: 224–40
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B CJ, Glasberg B R, Stone M A. Optimization of a slow-acting automatic gain control system for use in hearing aids. Br J Audiol 1991; 25: 171–82
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore B CJ, Lynch C, Stone M A. Effects of the fitting parameters of a two-channel compression system on the intelligibility of speech in quiet and in noise. Br J Audiol 1992; 26: 369–79
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plomp R. Noise, amplification, and compression considerations of three main issues in hearing aid design. Ear Hear 1994; 15: 2–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seewald R C. The desired sensation level method for fitting children: Version 3.0. The Hearing Journal 1992; 45: 36–41
   Google Scholar
• Shaw E AG. Transformation of sound pressure level from the free field to the eardrum in the horizontal plane. J Acoust Soc Am 1974; 56: 1848–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verschuure J, Dreschler W A. Dynamic compression in hearing aids. Psychoacoustics, Speech and Hearing Aids, B. Kollmeier. World Scientific, Singapore 1996; 153–64
   Google Scholar