Agreement between touch-screen and paper-based patient-reported outcomes for patients with fibromyalgia: a randomized cross-over reproducibility study

References

• Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Vondechend M, Bellamy N, Theiler R. Validation and patient acceptance of a computer touch screen version of the WOMAC 3.1 osteoarthritis index. Ann Rheum Dis 2005;64:80–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvien TK, Mowinckel P, Heiberg T, Dammann KL, Dale O, Aanerud GJ, et al. Performance of health status measures with a pen based personal digital assistant. Ann Rheum Dis 2005;64:1480–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schefte DB, Hetland ML. An open-source, self-explanatory touch screen in routine care. Validity of filling in the Bath measures on Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index, Function Index, the Health Assessment Questionnaire and Visual Analogue Scales in comparison with paper versions. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2010;49:99–104.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson AS, Kitas GD, Carruthers DM, Reay C, Skan J, Harris S, et al. Computerized information-gathering in specialist rheumatology clinics: an initial evaluation of an electronic version of the Short Form 36. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2002;41:268–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harlin SL, Harlin RD, Sherman TI, Rozsas CM, Shafqat MS, Meyers W. Using a structured, computer-administered questionnaire for evaluating health-related quality of life in patients with chronic lower extremity wounds. Ostomy Wound Manage 2009;55:30–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litaker D. New technology in quality of life research: are all computer-assisted approaches created equal? Qual Life Res 2003;12:387–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thekkumpurath P, Venkateswaran C, Kumar M, Newsham A, Bennett MI. Screening for psychological distress in palliative care: performance of touch screen questionnaires compared with semistructured psychiatric interview. J Pain Symptom Manage 2009;38:597–605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudbergsen H, Bartels E, Krusager P, Waehrens E, Christensen R, Danneskiold-Samsoe B, et al. Test-retest of computerized health status questionnaires frequently used in the monitoring of knee osteoarthritis: a randomized crossover trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2011;12:190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bent H, Ratzlaff CR, Goligher EC, Kopec JA, Gillies JH. Computer-administered Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis and Quebec Scale outcome questionnaires for low back pain: agreement with traditional paper format. J Rheumatol 2005;32:669–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Farrar JT, Haythornthwaite JA, Jensen MP, Katz NP, et al. Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain 2005;113:9–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dworkin RH, Fields HL. Fibromyalgia from the perspective of neuropathic pain. J Rheumatol Suppl 2005;75:1–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Amris K, Wæhrens EE, Jespersen A, Bliddal H, Danneskiold-Samsøe B. Observation-based assessment of functional ability in patients with chronic widespread pain: a cross-sectional study. Pain 2011;152:2470–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe F, Smythe HA, Yunus MB, Bennett RM, Bombardier C, Goldenberg DL, et al. The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of fibromyalgia: report of the multicenter criteria committee. Arthritis Rheum 1990;33: 160–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burckhardt CS, Clark SR, Bennett RM. The fibromyalgia impact questionnaire: development and validation. J Rheumatol 1991;18:728–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bech P, Rasmussen NA, Olsen LR, Noerholm V, Abildgaard W. The sensitivity and specificity of the Major Depression Inventory, using the Present State Examination as the index of diagnostic validity. J Affect Disord 2001;66:159–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuijpers P, Dekker J, Noteboom A, Smits N, Peen J. Sensitivity and specificity of the Major Depression Inventory in outpatients. BMC Psychiatry 2007;7:39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen LR, Jensen DV, Noerholm V, Martiny K, Bech P. The internal and external validity of the Major Depression Inventory in measuring severity of depressive states. Psychol Med 2003;33:351–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton M. The assessment of anxiety states by rating. Br J Med Psychol 1959;32:50–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenstiel AK, Keefe FJ. The use of coping strategies in chronic low back pain patients: relationship to patient characteristics and current adjustment. Pain 1983;17:33–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsh AT, George SZ, Riley JL III, Robinson ME. An evaluation of the measurement of pain catastrophizing by the coping strategies questionnaire. Eur J Pain 2007;11:75–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30:473–83.
   Google Scholar
• Ware JE Jr. SF-36 health survey update. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000;6:3130–9.
   Google Scholar
• Freynhagen R, Baron R, Gockel U, Tolle TR. painDETECT: a new screening questionnaire to identify neuropathic components in patients with back pain. Curr Med Res Opin 2006;22:1911–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric theory, 3rd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Wyrwich KW, Beaton D, Cleeland CS, Farrar JT, et al. Interpreting the clinical importance of treatment outcomes in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. J Pain 2008;9:105–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frennered K, Hägg O, Wessberg P. Validity of a computer touch-screen questionnaire system in back patients. Spine 2010;35:697–703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salaffi F, Gasparini S, Ciapetti A, Gutierrez M, Grassi M. Usability of an innovative and interactive elctronic system for collection of patient-reported data in axial spondyloarthritis: comparison with the traditional paper-administered format. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2013;52:2062–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hetland ML. DANBIO – powerful research database and electronic patient record. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2011;50:69–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar