The Relative Value of Spinal and Thoracic Mobility Measurements in Ankylosing Spondylitis

References

• Carrette S, Graham D, Little H, Rubenstein J, Rosen P. The natural disease course of ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Rheum 1983; 26: 186–90
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schober P. Lendenwirbelsäule und Kreuzschmerzen. Munchn Med Wschr 1937; 84: 336–8
   Google Scholar
• Macrae I F, Wright V. Measurement of back movement. Ann Rheum Dis 1969; 28: 584–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viitanen J, Kokko M-L, Lehtinen K, Suni J, Kautiainen H. Correlation between mobility restrictions and radiological changes in ankylosing spondylitis. Spine 1995; 20, in press
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moll J, Wright V. Normal range of spinal mobility. An objective clinical study. Ann Rheum Dis 1971; 30: 381–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twomey L. The effects of age on the ranges of motions of the lumbar region. Aust J Physiother 1979; 25: 257–63
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reynolds P GM. Measurement of spinal mobilitv. A comparison of three methods. Rheumatol Rehabil 1975; 15: 180–5
   Google Scholar
• Gauvin M, Riddle D, Rothstein J. Reliability of clinical measurements of forward bending using the modified finger-to-finger method. Phys Ther 1990; 70: 443–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pile K, Laurent M, Salmond C, Best M, Pyle E, Moloney R. Clinical assessment of ankylosing spondylitis: A study of observer variation in spinal measurements. Br J Rheumatol 1991; 30: 29–34
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Frost M, Stuckey S, Smalley L, Dorman G. Reliability of measuring trunk motions in centimeters. Phys Ther 1982; 62: 1431–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller S A, Mayer T, Cox R, Gathel RJ. Reliability problems associated with the modified Schober technique for true lumbar flexion measurement. Spine 1991; 17: 345–8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts W, Larson M, Liang M, Harrison R, Barefoot J, Clarke K. Sensitivity of anthropometric techniques for clinical trials in ankylosing spondylitis. Br J Rheumatol 1989; 28: 40–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Laurent M, Buchanan W, Bellamy N. Methods of assessment used in ankylosing spondylitis clinical trials: A review. Br J Rheumatol 1991; 30: 326–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O'Driscoll S, Jayson M, Baddeley H. Neck movements in ankylosing spondylitis and their responses to physiotherapy. Ann Rheum Dis 1978; 37: 64–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraag G, Stokes B, Groh J, Helewa A, Goldsmith C. The effects of comprehensive home physiotherapy and supervision on patients with ankylosing spondylitis - A randomized controlled trial. J Rheumatol 1990; 17: 228–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomlinson M, Barefoot J, Dixon A. Intensive in-patient physiotherapy courses improve movement and posture in ankylosing spondylitis. Physiotherapy 1986; 5: 238–40
   Google Scholar
• Viitanen J V, Suni J, Kautiainen H, Liimatainen M, Takala H. Effect of physiotherapy on spinal mobility in ankylosing spondylitis. Scand J Rheumatol 1992; 21: 38–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viitanen JV. Thoracolumbar rotation in ankylosing spondylitis. Spine 1993; 18: 880–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dale K, Vinje O. Radiography of the spine and sacroiliac joints in ankylosing spondylitis and psoriasis. Acta Radiolog Diagn (Stockh) 1985; 26: 145–60
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gregersen G, Lucas D. An in vivo study of the axial rotation of the human thoracolumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1967; 49-A: 247–62
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lurnsden R, Morris J. An in vivo study of axial rotation and immobilization at the lumbosacral joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1968; 50-A: 1591–602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunzburg R, Hutton W, Fraser R. Axial rotation of the lumbar spine and the effect of flexion. An in vitro and in vivo bio-mechanical study. Spine. 1991; 16: 22–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lysell E. Motion in the cervical spine: An experimental study on autopsy specimens. Acta Orthop Scand 1969; 123: 5–61, Suppl
   Google Scholar
• Grew N D, Harris JD. A method of measuring human body shape and movement - the “vector stereograph”. Eng Med 1979; 8: 115–8
   Google Scholar
• Thurston A J, Whitte M W, Stokes J AF. Spinal and pelvic movement during walking - a new method of study. Eng Med 1981; 10: 219–22
   Google Scholar
• Keeley J, Mayer T, Cox R, Gathel R, Smith J, Mooney V. Quantification of lumbar function. Part 5: Reliability of range-of-motion measures in the sagittal plane and an in vivo torso-rotation measurement technique. Spine 1986; 11: 31–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellin G. Measurement of thoracolumbar posture and mobility with a Myrin inclinometer. Spine 1986; 11: 759–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boline P, Keating J, Haas M, Andersson A. Intraexaminer reliability and discriminant validity of inclinometer measurement of lumbar rotation in chronic low-back pain patients and subjects without Iow-back pain. Spine 1991; 17: 335–7
   Google Scholar
• Dillard J, Trafimow J, Andersson G, Cronin K. Motion of the lumbar spine. Reliability of two measurement techniques. Spine 1991; 16: 321–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadir N, Grayson M, Goldberg A, Swain M. A new neck goniometer. Rheumatol Rehabil 1981; 20: 219–26
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Youdas J, Garrett T, Suman V, Bogard C, Hallman H, Carey J. Normal range of motion of the cervical spine: An initial goniometric study. Phys Ther 1992; 72: 770–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youdas J, Carey J, Garrett T. Reliability of measurements of cervical spine range of motion comparison of three methods. Phys Ther 1991; 71: 98–106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moll J, Wright V. The pattern of chest and spinal mobility in ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatol Rehabil 1973; 12: 115–34
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Loebl W. Measurement of spinal posture and range of spinal movements. Ann Phys Med 1968; 9: 103–10
   Google Scholar
• Hart F, Strickland D, Cliffe P. Measurement of spinal mobility. Ann Rheum Dis 1974; 33: 136–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturrock R, Wojtulewski J, Hart F. Spondylometry in a normal population and in ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatol Rehabil 1973; 12: 135–42
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pavelka K. Rotationmessung der Wirbelsäule. Z Rheumaforsch 1970; 29: 366–70
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Twomey L, Taylor J. Sagittal and horizontal plane movements of the human lumbar vertebral column in cadavers and in the living. Rheumatol Rehabil 1980; 19: 223–32
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mellin G. Method and instrument for noninvasive measurements of thoracolumbar rotation. Spine 1987; 12: 28–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellamy N, Buchanan W, Esdaile J, Fam A, Kean W, Thompsom J, et al. Ankylosing spondylitis antirheumatic drug trials. I. Effects of standardization procedures on observer dependent outcome measures. J Rheumatol 1991; 18: 1701–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker C, Boers M, van der Linden S. Measures to assess ankylosing spondylitis: taxonomy, review and recommendations. J Rheumatol 1993; 20: 1724–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moll J, Liyanage S, Wright V. An objective clinical method to measure lateral spinal flexion. Rheumatol Phys Med 1972; 11: 225–39
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mellin G. Accuracy of measuring lateral flexion of the spine with a tape. Clin Biomech 1986; 1: 85–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Linthoudt D, Francois RJ. Evaluation of the lateral flexion of the trunk. J Rheumatol 1991; 18: 788
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar