Novel MOS prediction models for compressed medical image quality

References

• Antonini, M., Barland, M., Mathieu, P. and Daubechies, I., 1992, Image coding using the wavelet transform. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 1, 205–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, A.S. and Knowles, G., 1992, Image compression using the 2-D wavelet transform. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 1, 244–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Said, A. and Pearlman, W.A., 1996, A new fast and efficient image codec based on set partitioning in hierarchical trees. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 6, 243–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, J.M., 1993, Embedded image coding using zerotrees of wavelet coefficients. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 31, 3445–3462.
   Google Scholar
• Pappas, T.N. and Safranek, R.J., 2000, Perceptual criteria for image quality evaluation. Handbook of Image and Video Processing, In: A.C. Bovik (Ed.) 2nd edn.New York: Elsevier Academic Presspp. 939–956.
   Google Scholar
• Eckert, M.P. and Bradley, A.P., 1998, Perceptual quality metrics applied to still image compression. Signal Processing, 70, 177–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginesu, G., Massidda, F. and Giusto, D.D., 2006, A multi-factor approach for image quality assessment based on a human visual system model. Signal Processing: Image Communication, 21, 316–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., Bovik, A.C., Sheikh, H.R. and Simoncelli, E.P., 2004, Image quality assessment: From error measurement to structural similarity. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 13, 600–612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martens, J.B. and Meesters, L., 1998, Image dissimilarity. Signal Processing, 70, 155–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Final report from the video quality experts group on the validation of objective models of video quality assessment, 2000, Available online at: http://www.vqeg.org/"Last accessed April 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Eskicioglu, A.M. and Fisher, P.S., 1995, Image quality measures and their performance. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 43, 2959–2965.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., Bovik, A.C. and Lu, L., 2002, Why is image quality assessment so difficult. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference of Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 4, 3313–3316.
   Google Scholar
• Engelke, U. and Zepernick, H.J., 2007, Perceptual-based quality metrics for image and video services. Proceedings of the 3rd EURO-NGI Conference on Next Generation Internet Networks, Trondheim, Norway, 21–23 May 2007, pp. 190–197.
   Google Scholar
• Ahumada, A.J., 1993, Computational image quality metrics: A review. SID Digest of Technical Papers, 24, 305–308.
   Google Scholar
• Eskicioglu, A.M. and Fisher, P.S., 1993, A survey of quality measures for grey scale image compression. Proceedings of NASA Space Earth Science Data Compression Workshop (NASA Conference Publication 3191), pp. 49–61.
   Google Scholar
• Daly, S., 1993, The visible differences predictor: An algorithm for the assessment of image fidelity, Digital Images and Human VisionIn: A.B. Watson (Ed.) Cambridge, MA: MIT Presspp. 179–206.
   Google Scholar
• Siddiqui, K.M., Johnson, J.P., Reiner, B.I. and Siegel, E.L., 2005, Discrete cosine transform JPEG compression vs. 2D JPEG2000 compression: JNDmetrix visual discrimination model image quality analysis. Proceedings of SPIE, 5748, 202–207.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Z. and Bovik, A.C., 2002, A universal image quality index. IEEE Signal Processing Letter, 9, 81–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, T.J., Chuang, K.S., Wu, J., Chen, S.C., Hwang, I.M. and Jan, M.L., 2003, A novel image quality index using Moran I statistics. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 48, N131–N137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckert, M.P. and Bradley, A.P., 1998, Perceptual quality metrics applied to still image compression. Signal Processing, 70, 177–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkler, S., 1999, Issues in vision modeling for perceptual video quality assessment. Signal Processing, 78, 231–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, Z., Wu, H.R., Winkler, S. and Chen, T., 2002, Vision model based impairment metric to evaluate blocking artifacts in digital video. Proceedings of IEEE, 90, 154–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peli, E., Arend, L.E., Young, G.M. and Goldstein, R.B., 1993, Contrast sensitivity to patch stimuli: Effects of spatial bandwidth and temporal presentation. Spatial Vision, 7, 1–14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Watson, A.B. and Solomon, J.A., 1997, Model of visual contrast gain control and pattern masking. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 14, 2379–2391.
   Google Scholar
• Peli, E., 1990, Contrast in complex images. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 7, 2032–2039.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ahumada, A.J. and Peterson, H.A., 1992, Luminance-Model based DCT quantization for color for color image compression. Proceedings of SPIE, 1666, 365–374.
   Google Scholar
• Lubin, J., 1993, The use of psychophysical data and models in the analysis of display system performance. Digital Images and Human VisionIn: A.B. Watson (Ed.) Cambridge, MA: MIT Presspp. 163–178.
   Google Scholar
• Legge, G.E. and Foley, J.M., 1980, Contrast masking in human vision. Journal of optical Society of America A, 70, 1458–1471.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, B.J., 2000, Irreversible Compression of Medical ImagesGreat Falls, VA: Society for Computer Applications in Radiology
   Google Scholar
• Clunie, D.A., 2000, Lossless compression of greyscale medical images – Effectiveness of traditional and state of the art approaches. Proceedings of SPIE, Medical Imaging, 3980, 74–84.
   Google Scholar
• Christopoulos, C., Skodras, A. and Ebrahimi, T., 2000, The JPEG2000 still image coding system: An overview. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, 46, 1103–1127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, W.J., Chine, C.F. and Li, K.J., 2003, Scalable medical data compression and transmission using wavelet transform for telemedicine applications. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, 7, 54–63.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bradley, J. and Erickson, M.D., 2002, Irreversible compression of medical images. Journal of Digital Imaging, 15, 5–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Y.G. and Tai, S.C., 2001, Medical image compression by discrete cosine transform spectral similarity strategy. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, l5, 236–243.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, D., Tan, D., Baird, M., DeCampo, J., White, C. and Wu, H.R., 2006, Perceptually lossless medical image coding. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 25, 335–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson, B.J., Manduca, A., Palisson, P., Persons, K.R., Earnest, F., Savcenko, V. and Hagiandreou, N.J., 1998, Wavelet compression of medical images. Radiology, 206, 599–607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y.-Y., 2007, Medical image compression using DCT-based subband decomposition and modified SPIHT data organization. Journal of Medical Informatics, 76, 717–725.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, A.B., Yang, G.Y., Solomon, J.A. and Villasenor, J., 1997, Visibility of wavelet quantization noise. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 6, 1164–1175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gravel, P., Beaudoin G.B. and De Guise, J.A., 2004, A method for modeling noise in medical images. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 23, 1221–1232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosman, P.C., Gray, R.M. and Olshen, R.A., 1994, Evaluating quality of compressed medical images: SNR, Subjective rating, and diagnostic accuracy. Proceedings of IEEE, 82, 919–932.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H., Haynor, D. and Kim, Y., 1992, Subjective evaluation of compressed image quality. Proceedings of SPIE, Image Capture, Formatting and Display, 1653, 241–245.
   Google Scholar
• Recommendation ITU-R BT. 500-6, Methodology for subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures, 1994 BT series (Television): 348–370, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, C.S., Watson, A.B. and Hitchner, L.E., 1998, Psychophysical rating of image compression techniques. Proceeding of SPIE, 1077, 198–208.
   Google Scholar
• Miyahara, M., Kotani, K. and Algazi, V.R., 1998, Objective picture quality scale (PQS) for image coding. IEEE Transactions on Communication, 46, 9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijk, A.M., Martens, J.B. and Watson, A.B., 1995, Quality assessment of coded images using numerical category scaling. Proceedings of SPIE, 2451, 90–101.
   Google Scholar
• Ahumada, A.J. and Null, C.H., 1993, Image quality: A multidimensional problem, Digital Images and Human VisionIn: A.B. Watson (Ed.) Cambridge, MA: MIT Presspp. 141–148.
   Google Scholar
• de Ridder H., and Majoor, G.M., 1990, Numerical category scaling: An efficient method for assessing digital image coding impairments. Proceedings of SPIE, 1249, 65.
   Google Scholar
• MedPix Database™: Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences (US). Available online at: http://rad.usuhs.mil/medpix/medpix.html
   Google Scholar