Ultrasonic imaging technologies in perspective

References

• Edler, I., Hertz, C.H., 1954, The use of the ultrasonic reflectoscope for the continuous recording of the movements of the heart walls. Kungliga Fysiografiska Sällskapets i Lund förhandlingar, 24, 40–58.
   Google Scholar
• Donald, I., MacVicar, J., Brown, T.G., 1958, Investigation of abdominal masses by pulsed ultrasound. Lancet, 1, 1188–1195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay, G.A., 1982, Traditional X-ray imaging. In: Wells, P.N.T. (Ed). Scientific Basis of Medical Imaging (Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone)), Chapter 1, pp. 1–53.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, D.A., O’Mara, R.E., 1982, Radionuclide imaging. In: Wells, P.N.T. (Ed). Scientific Basis of Medical Imaging (Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone)), Chapter 3, pp. 93–137.
   Google Scholar
• Hounsfield, G.N., 1973, Computerized transverse axial scanning (tomography). 1. Description of system. The British Journal of Radiology, 46, 1016–1022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrew, E.R., 1982, Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. In: Wells, P.N.T. (Ed). Scientific Basis of Medical Imaging (Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone)), Chapter 6, pp. 212–236.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health, 2010, Form 2010. http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Statistics/Performancedataandstatistics/HospitalActivityStatistics/DH_077487
   Google Scholar
• Halliwell, M., 2010, A tutorial on ultrasonic physics and imaging techniques. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of Engineering in Medicine, 224, 127–142.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bierig, S.M., 2009, Accuracy and cost comparison of ultrasound versus alternative imaging modalities, including CT, MR, PET, and angiography. Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, 25, 138–144.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, L., Nazarian, L.N., Carrino, J.A., Morrison, W.B., Grimaldi, G., Frangos, A.J., Levin, D.C., Rao, V.M., 2008, Musculoskeletal imaging: medicare use, costs, and potential for cost substitution. Journal of the American College of Radiology: 5, 182–188.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bedetti, G., Pasanisi, E.M., Pizzi, C., Turchetti, G., Loré, C., 2008, Economic analysis including long-term risks and costs of alternative diagnostic strategies to evaluate patients with chest pain. Cardiovascular Ultrasound, 6, 21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fazel, R., Krumholz, H.M., Wang, Y., Ross, J.S., Chen, J., Ting, H.H., Shah, N.D., et al. 2009, Exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation from medical imaging procedures. The New England Journal of Medicine, 361, 849–857.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ter Haar, G., 2010, Ultrasound bioeffects and safety. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of Engineering in Medicine, 224, 363–373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, P.N., 1986, The prudent use of diagnostic ultrasound. British Institute of Radiology presidential address 1986. The British Journal of Radiology, 59, 1143–1151.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• World Medical Association, 2008, Declaration of Helsinki–Ethical Principles for Medical Research involving Human Subjects. http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Savakus, H.P., Klicker, K.A., Newnham, R.E., 1981, PZT-epoxy piezoelectric transducers: a simplified fabrication procedure. Materials Research Bulletin, 16, 677–680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciçek, I., Bozkurt, A., Karaman, M., 2005, Design of a front-end integrated circuit for 3D acoustic imaging using 2D CMUT arrays. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 52, 2235–2241.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang, Z., Zhu, W., Zhu, H., Miao, J., Chao, C., Zhao, C., Tan, O.K., 2005, Fabrication and characterization of piezoelectric micromachined ultrasonic transducers with thick composite PZT films. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 52, 2289–2297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, J.A., Karaman, M., Khuri-Yakub, B.T., 2005, Coherent-array imaging using phased subarrays. Part I: basic principles. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 52, 37–50.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pedersen, M.H., Gammelmark, K.L., Jensen, J.A., 2007, In-vivo evaluation of convex array synthetic aperture imaging. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, 33, 37–47.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davies, T.J., Evans, R., 2010, System and methods for improving ultrasound imaging. US patent 7,850,611.
   Google Scholar
• Misaridis, T., Jensen, J.A., 2005, Use of modulated excitation signals in medical ultrasound. Part I: Basic concepts and expected benefits. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 52, 177–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiao, R.Y., Hao, X., 2005, Coded excitation for diagnostic ultrasound: a system developer’s perspective. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 52, 160–170.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lindop, J.E., Treece, G.M., Gee, A.H., Prager, R.W., 2006, 3D elastography using freehand ultrasound. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, 32, 529–545.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barratt, D.C., Davies, A.H., Hughes, A.D., Thom, S.A., Humphries, K.N., 2001, Optimisation and evaluation of an electromagnetic tracking device for high-accuracy three-dimensional ultrasound imaging of the carotid arteries. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, 27, 957–968.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith, S.W., Pavy, H.R., von Ramm, O.T., 1991, High-speed ultrasound volumetric imaging system. I. Transducer design and beam steering. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 38, 100–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemons, R.A., Quate, C.F., 1975, Acoustic microscopy: biomedical applications. Science (New York, NY.), 188, 905–911.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, F.S., Mehi, J., Lukacs, M., Hirson, D., White, C., Chaggares, C., Needles, A., 2009, A new 15–50 MHz array-based micro-ultrasound scanner for preclinical imaging. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, 35, 1700–1708.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Machet, L., Belot, V., Naouri, M., Boka, M., Mourtada, Y., Giraudeau, B., Laure, B., et al. 2009, Preoperative measurement of thickness of cutaneous melanoma using high-resolution 20 MHz ultrasound imaging: a monocenter prospective study and systematic review of the literature. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, 35, 1411–1420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, D.J., Silverman, R.H., Rondeau, M.J., 2000, Ophthalmology. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, 26 (Suppl 1), S128–S130.
   Google Scholar
• Yokosawa, K., Sasaki, K., Umemura, S., Shinomura, R., Ishikawa, S., Sano, S., Ito, Y., 2000, Intracorporeal imaging and differentiation of living tissue with an ultra-high-frequency ultrasound probe. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, 26, 503–507.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shattuck, D.P., Weinshenker, M.D., Smith, S.W., von Ramm, O.T., 1984, Explososcan: a parallel processing technique for high speed ultrasound imaging with linear phased arrays. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 75, 1273–1282.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sandrin, L., Tanter, M., Catheline, S., Fink, M., 2002, Shear modulus imaging with 2-D transient elastography. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 49, 426–435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Achim, A., Buxton, B., Tzagkarakis, G., Tsakalides, P., 2010, Compressive sensing for ultrasound RF echoes using a-stable distributions. Conference, 2010, 4304–4307.
   Google Scholar
• Kremkau, F.W., Gramiak, R., Carstensen, E.L., Shah, P.M., Kramer, D.H., 1970, Ultrasonic detection of cavitation at catheter tips. The American Journal of Roentgenology, Radium Therapy, and Nuclear Medicine, 110, 177–183.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Minnaert, M., 1933, On musical air-bubbles and the sounds of running water. Philosophical Magazine, 16, 235–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takalkar, A.M., Klibanov, A.L., Rychak, J.J., Lindner, J.R., Ley, K., 2004, Binding and detachment dynamics of microbubbles targeted to P-selectin under controlled shear flow. Journal of Controlled Release: 96, 473–482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekeredjian, R., Behrens, S., Ruef, J., Dinjus, E., Unger, E., Baum, M., Kuecherer, H.F., 2002, Potential of gold-bound microtubules as a new ultrasound contrast agent. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, 28, 691–695.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tang, M.X., Elson, D.S., Li, R., Dunsby, C., Eckersley, R.J., 2010, Photoacoustics, thermoacoustics, and acousto-optics for biomedical imaging. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of Engineering in Medicine, 224, 291–306.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stride, E.P., Coussios, C.C., 2010, Cavitation and contrast: the use of bubbles in ultrasound imaging and therapy. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of Engineering in Medicine, 224, 171–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, P.N., Wilson, S.R., Simpson, D.H., 2000, Pulse inversion imaging of liver blood flow: improved method for characterizing focal masses with microbubble contrast. Investigative Radiology, 35, 58–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tranquart, F., Grenier, N., Eder, V., Pourcelot, L., 1999, Clinical use of ultrasound tissue harmonic imaging. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, 25, 889–894.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, P.N., Liang, H.D., 2011, Medical ultrasound: imaging of soft tissue strain and elasticity. Journal of the Royal Society Interface: doi:10.1098/rsif.2011.0054.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ophir, J., Céspedes, I., Ponnekanti, H., Yazdi, Y., Li, X., 1991, Elastography: a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues. Ultrasonic Imaging, 13, 111–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyley, M.M., Bamber, J.C., Fuechsel, F., Bush, N.L., 2001, A freehand elastographic imaging approach for clinical breast imaging: system development and performance evaluation. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, 27, 1347–1357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nightingale, K., Soo, M.S., Nightingale, R., Trahey, G., 2002, Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging: in vivo demonstration of clinical feasibility. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, 28, 227–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bercoff, J., Tanter, M., Fink, M., 2004, Supersonic shear imaging: a new technique for soft tissue elasticity mapping. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 51, 396–409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halmann, M., Amemiya, S., 2006, Method and system for PDA-based ultrasound system. US patent 7,115,093.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, J.J., Pflugrath, L.S., Catallo, L.R., 1998, Ultrasonic diagnostic system with cordless scanheads. US patent 6,142,946.
   Google Scholar
• Glover, G.H., 1977, Computerized time-of flight ultrasonic tomography for breast examination. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, 3, 117–127.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zeqiri, B., Gélat, P.N., Barrie, J., Bickley, C.J., 2007, A novel pyroelectric method of determining ultrasonic transducer output power: device concept, modeling, and preliminary studies. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 54, 2318–2330.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liang, H.D., Halliwell, M., Wells, P.N., 2001, Continuous wave ultrasonic tomography. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 48, 285–292.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liang, H.D., Halliwell, M., Johnson, S., Wells, P.N., 2003, Incoherent imaging using continuous wave ultrasound. A preliminary study using bovine intervertebral discs. European Journal of Ultrasound: Official Journal of the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, 16, 253–260.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tsui, C.S., Liang, H.D., Halliwell, M., Shere, M., Braybrooke, J.P., Whipp, E., Wells, P.N.T., 2011, Coherent ultrasonic Doppler tomography. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, 37, 642–650.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Xu, Y., Wang, L.V., 2006, Rhesus monkey brain imaging through intact skull with thermoacoustic tomography. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 53, 542–548.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Niederhauser, J.J., Jaeger, M., Lemor, R., Weber, P., Frenz, M., 2005, Combined ultrasound and optoacoustic system for real-time high-contrast vascular imaging in vivo. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 24, 436–440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, P.C., Stevens, P.H., Smith, J.H., Kear, D., Key, H., Wells, P.N., 1987, The development of a system for transillumination computed tomography. The British Journal of Radiology, 60, 375–380.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wen, H., Shah, J., Balaban, R.S., 1998, Hall effect imaging. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 45, 119–124.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Duck, F.A., 1990, Physical Properties of Tissue (London: Academic Press), pp. 171–172.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, S.G.S., Robinson, I., 2008, Medical device technologies: who is the user? International Journal of Healthcare Technology and Management, 9, 181–197.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J.L., Murphy, E., Crowe, J.A., Norris, B.J., 2006, Capturing user requirements in medical device development: the role of ergonomics. Physiological Measurement, 27, R49–R62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weir, H., Grocott, P., Ram, M.B., 2006, The nurse’s role in contributing to new device development. Nursing Times, 102, 36–39.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dixon, D., Eatock, J., Meenan, B.J., Morgan, M., 2006, Application of design of experiment (DOE) techniques to process validation in medical device manufacture. Journal of Validation Technology, 12, 92–100.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A., Eatock, J., Dixon, D., Meenan, B.J., Anderson, J., 2008, Quality and continuous improvement in medical device manufacturing. The TQM Magazine, 20, 541–555.
   Google Scholar
• Eatock, J., Dixon, D., Young, T., 2009, An exploratory survey of current practice in the medical device industry. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 20, 218–234.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A., Meenan, B.J., Young, T.P., 2007, Medical device prices follow the experience curve. Journal of Medical Marketing, 7, 203–212.
   Google Scholar
• Cosh, E., Girling, A., Lilford, R., McAteer, H., Young, T., 2007, Investing new medical technologies: a decision framework. Journal of Commercial Biotechnology, 13, 263–271.
   Google Scholar
• Craven, M.P., Morgan, S.P., Crowe, J.A., Lu, B., 2009, Deploying a spreadsheet tool for early economic value assessment of medical device innovations with healthcare decision makers. Journal of Management and Marketing in Healthcare, 2, 278–292.
   Google Scholar
• Berwick, D.M., Weinstein, M.C., 1985, What do patients value? Willingness to pay for ultrasound in normal pregnancy. Medical Care, 23, 881–893.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen, J.A., Smith, R.D., 2001, Theory versus practice: a review of ‘willingness-to-pay’ in health and health care. Health Economics, 10, 39–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steuten, L., Buxton, M., 2010, Economic evaluation of healthcare safety: which attributes of safety do healthcare professionals consider most important in resource allocation decisions? Quality & Safety in Health Care, 19, e6.
   Google Scholar
• Bryan, S., Weatherburn, G., Buxton, M., Watkins, J., Keen, J., Muris, N., 1999, Evaluation of a hospital picture archiving and communication system. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 4, 204–209.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Girling, A., Young, T., Brown, C., Lilford, R., 2010, Early-stage valuation of medical devices: the role of developmental uncertainty. Value in Health: the Journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 13, 585–591.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Girling, A., Lilford, R., Young, T., 2011, Pricing of medical devices under coverage uncertainty− a modelling approach. Health Economics, in press.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Steuten, L., Vallejo-Torres, L., Young, T., Buxton, M., 2008, Transferability of economic evaluations of medical technologies: a new technology for orthopedic surgery. Expert Review of Medical Devices, 5, 329–336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar