A novel haemostatic powder delivery device applicable in minimally invasive surgery

References

• Mack, M.J., 2001, Minimally invasive and robotic surgery. Journal of the American Medical Association, 285, 568–572
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Najarian, S., Dargahi, J., Darbemamieh, G., and Farkoush, S.H., 2012, Mechatronics in medicine: A biomedical engineering approach, (New York: McGraw-Hill Publication Co.)
   Google Scholar
• Najarian, S., and Afshari E., 2012, Evolutions and future directions of surgical robotics: A review. International Journal of Clinical Medicine, 3, 75–82
   Google Scholar
• Yao, H.Y., 2004, Touch magnifying instrument applied to minimally invasive surgery [M.Sc. dissertation], (Montreal: McGill University). pp. 65. Available online at: http://www.cim.mcgill.ca/~hyyao/utactus.pdf. Accessed June 2013
   Google Scholar
• Klingler, C.H., Remzi, M., Marberger, M., and Janetschek, G., 2006, Haemostasis in laparoscopy. European Urology, 50, 948–957
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De la Torre, R.A., Bachman, S.L., Wheeler, A.A., Bartow, K.N., and Scott, J.S., 2007, Hemostasis and hemostatic agents in MIS. Journal of Surgery, 142, 39–45
   Google Scholar
• McGinnis, D.E., Strup, S.E., and Gomella, L.G., 2000, Management of hemorrhage during laparoscopy. Journal of Endourology, 14, 915–920
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniell, J., Fisher, B., and Alexander, W., 1993, Laparoscopic evaluation of the argon beam coagulator: Initial report. The Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 38, 121–125
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gill, I.S., Desai, M.M., Kaouk, J.H., Meraney, A.M., Murphy, D.P., Sung, G.T., and Novick, A.C., 2002, Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumor: Duplicating open surgical techniques. Journal of Urology, 167, 469–477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDougall, E.M., Finley, D., Clayman, R.V., Winfield, H.N., Gill, S.I., Nakada, S.Y., Shalhav, A.L., Babayan, R.K., and Sosa, R.E., 2005, Basic urologic laparoscopy: A standardized guideline for training programs, (Linthicum, MD: the American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.)
   Google Scholar
• Abul Nagah, G., EL-Fayoumi, T., Lotfy, H., Shehab, W., and Tarek, A., 2007, Comparative study between using harmonic scalpel and electrocautery in modified radical mastectomy. Egyptian Journal of Surgery, 26, 176–180
   Google Scholar
• , ASGE Technology CommitteeWong Kee Song, L.M., Banerjee, S., Barth, B.A., Bhat, Y., Desilet, D., Gottlieb, K.T., Maple, J.T., Pfau, P.R., Pleskow, D.K., Siddiqui, U.D., Tokar, J.L., Wang, A., and Rodriquez, S.A., 2012, Emerging technologies for endoscopic hemostasis. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 75, 933–937
   Google Scholar
• Murat, F.J., Ereth, M.H., Dong, Y., Piedra, M.P., and Gettman, M.T., 2004, Evaluation of microporous polysaccharide hemospheres as a novel hemostatic agent in open partial nephrectomy: Favorable experimental results in the porcine model. The Journal of Urology, 172, 1119–1122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kordestani, S.S., Noohi, F., Azarnik, H., Basiri, H., Hashemi, M.J., Abdi, S., Mohebi, A., Madani, M., and Nayebhabib, F., 2012, A randomized controlled trial on the hemostasis of femoral artery using topical hemostatic agent. Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis, 18, 501–505
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, N.E., Siddiqui, S.A., Agarwal, S., McKellar, S.H., Kurtz, H.J., Gettman, M.T., and Ereth, M.H., 2009, Choice of hemostatic agent influence adhesion formation in a rat cecal adhesion model. Journal of Surgical Research, 155, 77–81
   Google Scholar
• Björses, K., and Holst, J., 2007, Various local hemostatic agents with different modes of action; An in vivo comparative randomized vascular surgical experimental study. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 33, 363–370
   Google Scholar
• Antisdel, J.L., Janney, C.G., Long, J.P., and Sindwani, R., 2008, Hemostatic agent microporous polysaccharide hemospheres (MPH) does not affect healing or intact sinus mucosa. The Laryngoscope, 118, 1265–1270
   Google Scholar
• Antisdel, J.L., West-Denning, J.L., and Sindwani, R., 2009, Effect of microporous polysaccharide hemospheres (MPH) on bleeding after endoscopic sinus surgery: Randomized controlled study. Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, 141, 353–357
   Google Scholar
• Sindwani, R., 2009, Use of novel hemostatic powder MPH for endoscopic sinus surgery: Initial impressions. Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, 140, 262–263
   Google Scholar
• Sung, J.J.Y., Luo, D., Wu, J.C.Y., Ching, J.Y.L., Chan, F.K.L., Lau, J.Y.W., Mack, S., Ducharme, R., Okolo, P., Canto, M., Kalloo, A., and Giday, S.A., 2011, Early clinical experience of the safety and effectiveness of hemospray in achieving hemostasis in patients with acute peptic ulcer bleeding. Endoscopy, 43, 291–295
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holster, I.L., Poley, J.W., Kuipers, E.J., and Tjwa, E.T., 2012, Controlling gastric variceal bleeding with endoscopically applied hemostatic powder (HemosprayTM). Journal of Hepatology, 57, 1397–1398. Letter to Editor
   Google Scholar
• Barnard, J., and Millner, R., 2009, A review of topical hemostatic agents for use in cardiac surgery. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 88, 1377–1383
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChitoTech Inc. www.chitotech.com/new/site/chitohem
   Google Scholar
• Nakajima, K., Nishida, T., Milsom, J.W., Takahashi, T., Souma, Y., Miyazaki, Y., Iijima, H., Mori, M., and Doki, Y., 2010, Current limitations in endoscopic CO2 insufflation for NOTES: Flow and pressure study. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 72, 1036–1042
   Google Scholar
• Liem, T., Applebaum, H., and Herzberger, B., 1994, Hemodynamic and ventilatory effects of abdominal CO2 insufflation at various pressures in the young swine. Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 29, 966–969
   Google Scholar
• Ma, J.J., Feng, B., Zhang, Y., Li, J.W., Lu, A.G., Wang, M.L., Peng, Y.F., Hu, W.G., Yue, F., and Zheng, M.H., 2009, Higher CO2-insufflation pressure inhibits the expression of adhesion molecules and the invasion potential of colon cancer cells. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 15, 2714–2722
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar