A CAD system to analyse mammogram images using fully complex-valued relaxation neural network ensembled classifier

References

• Sirovich, B.E., and Sox H.C. Jr., 1999, Breast cancer screening. Surgical Clinics of North America, 79, 961–990
   Google Scholar
• Sampat, M.P., Markey, M.K., and Bovik, A.C., 2003, Computer-Aided Detection and Diagnosis in Mammography, Handbook of Image and Video Processing (London, U.K.: Elsevier)
   Google Scholar
• Kerlikowske, K., Carney, P.A., Geller, B., Mandelson, M.T., Taplin, S.H., Malvin, K., Ernster, V., Urban, N., Cutter, G., Rosenberg, R., and Barbash, R.B., 2000, Performance of screening mammography among Women with and without a first-degree relative with breast cancer. Annals of Internal Medicine, 133, 855–863
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bird, R.E., Wallace, T.W., and Yankaskas, B.C., 1992, Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. Radiology, 184, 613–617
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akay, M.F., 2009, Support vector machines combined with feature selection for breast cancer diagnosis. Expert Systems With Applications, 36, 3240–3247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganesan, K., Acharya, UR., Chua, CK., Min, LC., Abraham, KT., and Ng, K-H., 2013, Computer aided breast cancer detection using Mammograms: A review. IEEE Reviews In Biomedical Engineering, 6, 77–98
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brem, R., 2007, Clinical versus research approach to breast cancer detection with CAD: Where are we now? American Journal of Roentology, 188, 234–235
   Google Scholar
• Valdovinos, R. and Sanchez, J., 2007, Performance analysis of classifier ensembles: neural networks versus nearest neighbor rule. Pattern Recognit Image Anal. (Lecture Notes in Computer Science) 4477, 105–112
   Google Scholar
• Rani, U., 2010, Parallel approach for diagnosis of breast cancer using neural network technique. International Journal of Computer Applications, 10, 1–5
   Google Scholar
• Abdelaal, M., Sena, H., Farouq, M., and Salem, A., 2010, “Using Pattern recognition Approach for Providing Second Opinion of Breast Cancer Diagnosis,” The 7th International Conference on Informatics and Systems (INFOS’10), Cairo, pp. 1–7
   Google Scholar
• Abbosh, Y., Yahya, A., and Abbosh, A., March 2011, “Neural networks for the detection and localization of breast cancer,” International Conference on Communications and Information Technology (ICCIT), pp.156–159
   Google Scholar
• Samulski, M., and Karssemeijer, N., 2011, Optimizing case-based detection performance in a multiview CAD system for mammography. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 30, 1001–1009
   Google Scholar
• Kuncheva, L., 2004, Combining Pattern Classifiers: Methods and Algorithms (New York: Wiley)
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, J., Kuncheva, L., and Alonso, C., 2006, Rotation forest: A new classifier ensemble method. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 28, 1619–1630
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos, E., Sbourin, R., and Maupin, P., 2008, “Pareto Analysis for the Selection of Classifier Ensembles” In: Proceedings of the 10th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation (GECCO 2008), pp. 681–688 (2008), doi:10.1145/1389095.1389229
   Google Scholar
• Gou, S., Yang, H., Jiao, L., and Zhuang, X., 2010: Algorithm of Partition Based Network Boosting for Imbalanced Data Classification. In: The 2010 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, pp. 1–6. IEEE, Barcelona
   Google Scholar
• Liu, J., Chen, J., Liu, X., and Tang, J., 2011: An Investigate of Mass Diagnosis in Mammogram with Random Forest. In: Fourth International Workshop on Advanced Computational Intelligence, pp. 638–641. IEEE, Wuhan
   Google Scholar
• Roselin, R. and Thangavel, K., 2010: Classification Ensemble for Mammograms Using Ant-Miner. In: Second International conference on Computing, Communication and Networking Technologies, pp. 1–6. IEEE, Karur
   Google Scholar
• Meena, Y., Arya, K., and Kala, R., 2010: Classification Using Redundant Mapping in Modular Neural Networks. In: Second World Congress on Nature and Biologically Inspired Computing, pp. 554–559. IEEE, Fukuoka
   Google Scholar
• Huang, Y., Monekosso, D., and Wang, H., 2010: Clustering Ensemble Based on Multi-Classifier Fusion. In: 2010 IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Intelligent Systems (ICIS), pp. 393–397. IEEE, Xiamen
   Google Scholar
• Razavi, A., Gill, H., Åhlfeldt, H., and Shahsavar, N., 2007, Predicting metastasis in breast cancer: Comparing adecision tree with domain experts. Journal of Medical Systems, 31, 263–273
   Google Scholar
• Nithya, R., and Santhi, B., 2011, Classification of normal and abnormal patterns in digital mammograms for diagnosis of breast cancer. International Journal of Computer Applications, 28, 21–25
   Google Scholar
• Mc Leod, P. and Verma, B., 2013, ‘Variable Hidden Neuron Ensemble for Mass Classification in Digital Mammograms’, IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine, 8(1), 68–76
   Google Scholar
• Savitha, R., Suresh, S., and Sundararajan, N., 2013, Projection-based fast learning fully complex-valued relaxation neural network. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks And Learning Systems, 24(4), 529–541
   Google Scholar
• Hirose, A., and Yoshida, S., 2012, Generalization characteristics of complex valued feed forward neural networks in relation to signal coherence. IEEE Transactions of Neural Network and Learning Systems, 23, 541–551
   Google Scholar
• Suckling, J., Parker, J., Dance, D.R., Astley, S., Hutt, I., Boggis, C., Ricketts, I., Stamatakis, E., Cerneaz, N., Kok, SL., Taylor, P., Betal, D., and Savage, J., 1994, The Mammographic Image Analysis Society Digital Mammogram Database. Exerpta Medica Amsterdam, International Congress Series 1069, 375–378
   Google Scholar
• Horváth, J., 2006, Image Segmentation Using Fuzzy C-Means (SAMI). Available online at: http://bmf.hu/conferences/sami2006/JurajHorvarth.pdf [last accessed 25 Sep 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Kinoshita, S.K., Marques, P.M.A., Slates, A.F.F., Marana, H.R.C., Ferrari, R.J. and Villela, R.L. June 1998, “Detection and characterization of mammographic masses by artificial neural network,” in Proc. 4th Int. Workshop Digital Mammography, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, pp. 489–490
   Google Scholar
• Chitre, Y., Dhawan, A.P., and Moskowitz, M., 1993, Artificial neural network based classification of mammographic microcalcifications using image structure features. International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, 7, 1377–1402
   Google Scholar
• Verma, B., and Zakos, J., 2001, A computer-aided diagnosis system for digital mammograms based on fuzzy-neural and feature extraction techniques. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, 5, 46–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umbaugh, SE. Computer Vision and Image Processing. Prentice-Hall International Editions, 1998. CVIP tools, A comprehensive computer vision and image processing software package available (free!) from Southern Illinois University at Edwardsville. Available online at: http://www.ee.siue.edn/CVIPtools. [last accessed 8 July 2013]
   Google Scholar
• DeLong, E.R., DeLong, D.M., and Clarke-Pearson, D.L., 1988, Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: A nonparametric approach. Biometrics, 44, 837–845
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoonjans, F., Zalata, A., Depuydt, CE., and Comhaire, F.H., 1995, “MedCalc: a new computer program for medical statistics” Comput Methods Programs Biomed, 48, pp. 257–262http://www.medcalc.org/download.php
   Google Scholar