Stress distribution in implant-supported prostheses using different connection systems and cantilever lengths: digital photoelasticity

References

• Lin D, Li Q, Li W, et al. Mandibular bone remodeling induced by dental implant. J Biomech. 2010;43:287–293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaviria L, Salcido JP, Guda T, et al. Current trends in dental implants. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;40:50–60.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Serino G, Turri A. Extent and location of bone loss at dental implants in patients with peri-implantitis. J Biomech. 2011;44:267–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aglietta M, Siciliano VI, Zwahlen M, et al. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant supported fixed dental prostheses with cantilever extensions after an observation period of at least 5 years. Clin Oral Implant Res. 2009;20:441–451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osier JF. Biomechanical load analysis of cantilevered implant systems. J Oral Implant. 1991;17:40–47.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Setia G, Yousef H, Ehrenberg D, et al. The effects of loading on the preload and dimensions of the abutment screw for a 3-unit cantilever-fixed prosthesis design. Implant Dent. 2013;22:414–421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zurdo J, Romao C, Wennstrom JL. Survival and complication rates of implant-supported fixed partial dentures with cantilevers: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implant Res. 2009;20(Suppl 4):59–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim Y, Oh TJ, Misch CE, et al. Occlusal considerations in implant therapy: clinical guidelines with biomechanical rationale. Clin Oral Implant Res. 2005;16:26–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alkan I, Sertgöz A, Ekici B. Influence of occlusal forces on stress distribution in preloaded dental implant screws. J Prosth Dent. 2004;91:319–325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binon PP. Implants and components: entering the new millennium. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant. 2000;15:76–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho Goiato M, Pesqueira AA, Falcón-Antenucci RM, et al. Stress distribution in implant-supported prosthesis with external and internal implant-abutment connections. Acta Odont Scand. 2013;71:283–288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drago CJ, O’Connor CG. A clinical report on the 18-month cumulative survival rates of implants and implant prostheses with an internal connection implant system. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2006;27:266–271.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Finger IM, Castellon P, Block M, et al. The evolution of external and internal implant/abutment connections. Prac Proced Aesthet Dent. 2003;15:625–632; quiz 634.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mangano C, Mangano F, Piattelli A, et al. Prospective clinical evaluation of 1920 Morse taper connection implants: results after 4 years of functional loading. Clin Oral Implant Res. 2009;20:254–261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astrand P, Engquist B, Dahlgren S, et al. Astra Tech and Branemark system implants: a 5-year prospective study of marginal bone reactions. Clin Oral Implant Res. 2004;15:413–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maeda Y, Satoh T, Sogo M. In vitro differences of stress concentrations for internal and external hex implant-abutment connections: a short communication. J Oral Rehab. 2006;33:75–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merz BR, Hunenbart S, Belser UC. Mechanics of the implant-abutment connection: an 8-degree taper compared to a butt joint connection. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant. 2000;15:519–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss EI, Kozak D, Gross MD. Effect of repeated closures on opening torque values in seven abutment-implant systems. J Prosth Dent. 2000;84:194–199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abduo J, Bennani V, Waddell N, et al. Assessing the fit of implant fixed prostheses: a critical review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant. 2010;25:506–515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francetti L, Agliardi E, Testori T, et al. Immediate rehabilitation of the mandible with fixed full prosthesis supported by axial and tilted implants: interim results of a single cohort prospective study. Clin Implant Dent Rel Res. 2008;10:255–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu YT, Fu JH, Al-Hezaimi K, et al. Biomechanical implant treatment complications: a systematic review of clinical studies of implants with at least 1 year of functional loading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant. 2012;27:894–904.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khraisat A, Stegaroiu R, Nomura S, et al. Fatigue resistance of two implant/abutment joint designs. J Prosth Dent. 2002;88:604–610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misch E. Consideration of biomechanical stress in treatment with dental implants. Dent Today. 2006;25:80,82,84–85.
   Google Scholar
• Naveau A, Renault P, Pierrisnard L. Effects of vertical interarch space and abutment height on stress distributions: a 3D finite element analysis. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2009;17:90–94.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goiato MC, Tonella BP, Ribeiro P do P, et al. Methods used for assessing stresses in buccomaxillary prostheses: photoelasticity, finite element technique, and extensometry. J Craniofac Surg. 2009;20:561–564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesqueira A, Goiato MC, dos Santos DM, et al. Stress analysis in oral obturator prostheses over parallel and tilted implants: photoelastic imaging. J Biomed Optics. 2013;18:106009–106013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesqueira AA, Goiato MC, dos Santos DM, et al. Stress analysis in oral obturator prostheses: imaging photoelastic. J Biomed Optics. 2013;18:061203–061205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen WL, Chen CS, Hsu ML. Influence of implant collar design on stress and strain distribution in the crestal compact bone: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant. 2010;25:901–910.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor TD, Agar JR. Twenty years of progress in implant prosthodontics. J Prosth Dent. 2002;88:89–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fanuscu MI, Caputo AA. Influence of attachment systems on load transfer of an implant-assisted maxillary overdenture. J Prosthodont. 2004;13:214–220.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cehreli M, Duyck J, De Cooman M, et al. Implant design and interface force transfer. A photoelastic and strain-gauge analysis. Clin Oral Implant Res. 2004;15:249–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brosh T, Pilo R, Sudai D. The influence of abutment angulation on strains and stresses along the implant/bone interface: comparison between two experimental techniques. J Prosth Dent. 1998;79:328–334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunski JB, Skalak R. Biomechanical considerations applications to the maxillofacial region. Advance osseointregation surgery. Chicago, IL: Quintessence; 1990. p. 15–38.
   Google Scholar
• Matsunaga S, Shirakura Y, Ohashi T, et al. Biomechanical role of peri-implant cancellous bone architecture. Int J Prosthodont. 2010;23:333–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rangert B, Jemt T, Jörneus L. Forces and moments on Branemark implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant. 1989;4:241–247.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peñarrocha-Diago MA, Flichy-Fernández AJ, Alonso-González R, et al. Influence of implant neck design and implant-abutment connection type on peri-implant health. Radiological study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;24:1192–1200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo KT, Lee EJ, Kim JY, et al. The effect of internal versus external abutment connection modes on crestal bone changes around dental implants: a radiographic analysis. J Periodontol. 2012;83:1104–1109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malo P, de Araujo Nobre M, Lopes A. The prognosis of partial implant-supported fixed dental prostheses with cantilevers. A 5-year retrospective cohort study. Eur J Oral Implant. 2013;6:51–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar