Speech technology—implications for biomedical engineering

References

• Wiggins R., Brantingham L. Three-chip system synthesises human speech. Electronics 31 August, 1978; 109–116
   Google Scholar
• Lea W. A. Towards versatile speech communication with computers. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 1970; 2: 107–155
   Google Scholar
• Weinrich D. W. Speech-synthesis chip borrows human intonation. Electronics 10 April, 1980; 113–118
   Google Scholar
• Markel J. D., Gray A. H. Linear Prediction of Speech. Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1976
   Google Scholar
• Holmes J. N. Speech Synthesis. Mills and Boone, London 1972
   Google Scholar
• Maitra S., Davies C. R. Improvements in the classical model for better speech quality. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing 1980; 28: 23–27
   Google Scholar
• Holmls J. N., Mattingly I. G., Shearme J. N. Speech synthesis by rule. Language and Speech 1964; 7: 127–143
   Google Scholar
• Smith W., Crook, Sharon B. Phonemes, allophones and LPC team to synthesis speech. Electronic Design 25 June, 1981; 121–127
   Google Scholar
• Pisoni D. B. Perceptual evaluation of MITALK: the MIT urestricted text-to-speech system. Paper presented at the IEEE Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing. 1980, 572–575, in the Proceedings
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein J. Unlimited text-to-speech system: description and evaluation of a microprocessor-based system. Paper presented at the IEEE Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing. 1980, 576–579, in the Proceedings
   Google Scholar
• Cherry E. C. On Human Communication 2nd edition. MIT Press. 1966
   Google Scholar
• Sitton G. A. Acoustic segmentation of speech. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 1970; 2: 61–102
   Google Scholar
• Brooks C. P. Computer transliteration of shorthand. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference of the Simplified Spelling Society, Edinburgh, 1981, rpt. Spelling Progress Bulletin (July)
   Google Scholar
• Pay B. E., Evans C. R. An approach to the automatic recognition of speech. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 1981; 14: 13–27
   Google Scholar
• Iverson R. D., Arnott P. J., Pfeiffer G. W. A software interface for speech recognition. Computer Design March, 1982; 147–152
   Google Scholar
• Licklider J. C. R., Pollack I. P. Effects of differentiation. integration and infinite peak clipping upon the intelligibility of speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1948; 20: 42
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bezdel W., Bridle J. S. Speech recognition using zero-crossing measurements and sequence information. Proceedings of the IEEE 1969; 116: 617–623
   Google Scholar
• Rabiner C. R., Sambur M. R. An algorithm for detecting the end-points of isolated utterances. Bell Systems Technical Journal 1975; 54: 297–315
   Google Scholar
• Sakoe H. Two-level DP matching—a dynamic programming based pattern matching algorithm for connected word recognition. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing 1979; 27: 588–595
   Google Scholar
• Lowerre B. T., Reddy R. D. The Harpy speech understanding system. Trends in Speech Recognition, W. A. Lea, Prentice-Hall 1980
   Google Scholar
• Houde R. A. Prospects for automatic recognition of speech. American Annals of the Deaf 1979; 124: 568–572
   Google Scholar
• Ciarcia S. A. Build an unlimited vocabulary speech synthesizer. Byte September, 1981; 38–50
   Google Scholar
• Browman C. P. Rules for demisyllable synthesis using LINGUA, a language interpreter. Paper presented at the IEEE Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing. 1980, 561–564, in the Proceedings
   Google Scholar
• Moshier S. L. Talker independent speech recognition in commercial environments. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1979; 65, Supplement No. 1
   Google Scholar
• Hill D. R. An abbreviated guide to planning for speech interaction with machines: the state of the art. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 1972; 4
   Google Scholar
• Cottenden A. M., Stocking B., Jones N. B., Morrison S. L., Rothwell R. Biomedical engineering—priorities for research in external aids. Journal of Biomedical Engineering 1981; 3: 325–328
   Google Scholar
• Colby K. M., Christinaz D., Graham S. A computer driven, personal, portable and intelligent speech prosthesis. Computers in Biomedical Research 1978; 11: 337–343
   Google Scholar
• Carlson R., Galyas K., Granstrom B., Hunnicutt Sheri, Larsson B., Neovius L. A multi-language. portable text-to-speech system for the disabled. Journal of Biomedical Engineering 1981; 3: 285–288
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kurzweil Reading Machine: results of a joint investigation by RNIB and St. Dunstan's Hospital. RNIB, 224 Great Portland Street, London, WIN 6AA report available from
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald J. Private communication
   Google Scholar
• King R. W., Omotayo O. R. Synthetic speech as a medium for the output of electronic information services for blind people. Paper presented at the IEE Conference on Man-Machine Systems, ManchesterUK, July, 1982
   Google Scholar
• Ward B. Very special computers. Sky June, 1981; 46–55
   Google Scholar
• Youdin M., Sell G. H., Reich T., Clagnaz M., Louie H., Kolwicz R. A voice controlled powered wheelchair and environmental control for the severely disabled. Medical Progress through Technology 1980; 7: 139–143
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cohen A., Gaupe D. Speech recognition and control system for the severely disabled. Journal of Biomedical Engineering 1980; 2: 97–107
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Odor P., Sharp S. How microcomputers can help severely handicapped people. Paper presented at Disability and Technology in the 80s, held at Sussex University. 1981, 105–111, in the Conference papers
   Google Scholar
• Potter R. K., Kopp G. A., Kopp H. G. Visible Speech. Dover, New York 1966
   Google Scholar
• Fallside F. Communication aids for the deaf. Endeavour 1979; 3: 6348
   Google Scholar
• Crichton R. G., Fallside F. Linear orediction model of speech production with application to deaf speech training. Proceedings of the IEE 1974; 121: 865–873
   Google Scholar
• Schofield Julia. Microcomputer-based Aids for the Disabled. British Computer Society Monographs in Informatics, Heyden, London 1981
   Google Scholar
• Enderby Pam, Hamilton G. Clinical trials for communication aids? A study provoked by the clinical trials for SPLINK. International Journal of Rehabilitation and Research 1981; 4: 181–195
   Google Scholar
• Rothauser E. H. A comparison of preference measurement methods. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1971; 49: 1297–1308
   Google Scholar
• Doddington G. R., Schalk T. B. Speech recognition: turning theory into practice. IEEE Spectrum September, 1981; 26–32
   Google Scholar
• Moore R. K. Evaluating speech recognizers. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing 1977; 25: 178–182
   Google Scholar