45
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Recording of foetal movements: a comparison of three methods

, &
Pages 239-247 | Published online: 09 Jul 2009

References

  • Saoovsky E., Yaffe H. Daily fetal movement recording and fetal prognosis. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1973; 41: 845–850
  • Pearson J. F., Weaver J. B. Fetal activity and fetal well-being: an evaluation. British Medical Journal 1976; i: 1305–1307
  • Wood C, Walters W. A. W., Trigg P. Methods of recording fetal movement. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1977; 84: 561–567
  • Ehrström C. Fetal movement monitoring in normal and high-risk pregnancy. Acta Obstetricia et Gyne-cologica Scandinavica 1979, Suppl. 80
  • Sadovsky E., Polishuk W. Z., Mahler Y., Malkin A. Correlation between electromagnetic recording and maternal assessment of fetal movement. Lancet 1973; i: 1141–1143
  • Sadovsky E., Polishuk W. Z., Yaffe H., Adler D., Pachys F., Mahler Y. Fetal movements recorder, use and indications. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 1977; 15: 20–24
  • Sorokin Y., Pillay S., Dierker L. J., Hertz R. H., Rosen M. G. A comparison between maternal, tocodynamometric and real-time ultrasonographic assessments of fetal movement. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1981; 140: 456–460
  • Granat M., La vie P., Adar D., Sharf M. Short-term cycles in human fetal activity. I. Normal pregnancies. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1979; 134: 696–701
  • Leader L. R., Baillie P. The accuracy of maternal observation of fetal movement. South African Medical Journal 1979; 55: 836–837
  • Rayburn W. F. Clinical significance of perceptible fetal motion. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1980; 138: 210–212
  • Neldam S., Jessen P. Fetal movements registered by the pregnant woman correlated to retrospective estimations of fetal movements from cardiotocographic tracings. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1980; 136: 1051–1054
  • Neldam S. Fetal movements. A comparison between maternal assessment and registration by means of dynamic ultrasound. Danish Medical Bulletin 1982; 29: 197–199
  • Hertogs K., Roberts A. B., Cooper D., Griffin D. R., Campbell S. Maternal perception of fetal motor activity. British Medical Journal 1979; ii: 1183–1185
  • Getttnger A., Roberts A. B., Campbell S. Comparison between subjective and ultrasound assessments of fetal movement. British Medical Journal 1978; ii: 88–90
  • Lindström K., Marsal K., Ulmsten U. Fetal movements detector. Foetal and Neonatal Physiological Measurements, P. Rolfe. Pitman Medical Ltd, London 1981; 233–243
  • Lindström K., Marsaal K. Fetal breathing and movement. Non-invasive Physiological Measurements, P. Rolfe. Academic Press Inc., London 1983; vol. 2: 61–101
  • Prenzlau P., Bayer H., Hoffman H. Fetale Bewegungsmuster im externen CTG und deren Deutung durch simultane Ultraschallbeobachtung. Zentralblatt fur Gynäkologie 1983; 105: 972–976
  • Schmidt W., Cseh I., Hara K., Kubli F. Maternal perception of fetal movements and real-time ultrasound findings. Journal of Perinatal Medicine 1984; 12: 313–318
  • Schmidt W., Cseh I., Hara K., Kubli F. Maternal perception, tocodynamometric findings and realtime ultrasound assessment of total fetal activity. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 1984; 23: 85–90

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.