In vivo tissue characterization using quantitative computed tomography: a review

References

• Williams G., Byder G. M., Kreel L. The validity and use of computed tomography attenuation values. British Medical Bulletin 1980; 36: 279–287
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Chiro G., Brooks R. A. The 1979 Nobel Prize in physiology or medicine. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 1980; 4: 241–245
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks R. A., Di Chiro G. Principles of computer assisted tomography (CAT) in radiographic and radioisotopic imaging. Physics in Medicine and Biology 1976; 21: 689–732
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herman G. T. Image Reconstruction from Projections. Academic Press, New York 1980
   Google Scholar
• Cormack A. M. Representation of a function by its line integrals with some radiological applications. Journal of Applied Physics 1963; 34: 2722–2727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cormack A. M. Representation of a function by its line integrals with some radiological applications. II. Journal of Applied Physics 1964; 35: 2908–2913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hounsfield G. N. Computerised transverse axial scanning (tomography): Part 1. Description of system. British Journal of Raidology 1973; 46: 1016–1022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bracewell R. N. Strip integration in radioastronomy. Australian Journal of Physics 1956; 9: 198–217
   Google Scholar
• Brooks R. A., Di Chiro G. Beam hardening in X-ray reconstructive tomogrpahy. Physics in Medicine and Biology 1976; 21: 390–398
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herman G. T. Correction for beam hardening in computed tomography. Physics in Medicine and Biology 1979; 24: 81–106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph P. M., Spital R. D. The effects of scatter in x-ray computed tomography. Medical Physics 1982; 9: 444–472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glover G. H. Compton scatter effects in CT reconstructions. Medical Physics 1982; 9: 860–867
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran P. R., Kwa W. S. Y., Chenery S. A. G. The influence of scattered radiation on the CT numbers of bone on a scanner with a fixed detector array. Physics in Medicine and Biology 1983; 28: 939–951
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merritt R. B., Chenery S. G. Quantitative CT measurements: the effect of scatter acceptance and filter characteristics on the EMI 7070. Physics in Medicine and Biology 1986; 31: 55–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph P. M., Spital R. D. The exponential edge-gradient effect in x-ray computed tomography. Physics in Medicine and Biology 1981; 26: 473–487
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks R. A. A quantitative theory of the Hounsfield unit and its application to dual energy scanning. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 1977; 1: 487–493
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutherford R. A., Pullan B. R., Isherwood I. Calibration and response of an EMI scanner. Neuroradiology 1976; 11: 7–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veigele W. J. Photo cross-sections from 0·1 keV to 1 MeV for elements Z = 1 to Z = 94. Atomic Data Tables 1973; 5: 51–111
   Google Scholar
• Rutherford R. A., Pullan B. R., Isherwood I. Measurement of effective atomic number and electron density using an EMI scanner. Neuroradiology 1976; 11: 15–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isherwood I., Pullan B. R., Rutherford A., Strang F. A. Electron density and atomic number determination by computed tomography. Part 1: methods and limitations. Part II: a study of colloid cysts. British Journal of Radiology 1977; 50: 613–619
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latchaw R. E., Payne J. T., Gold L. H. A. Effective atomic number and electron density as measured with a computed tomography scanner: computation and correlation with brain tumor histology. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 1978; 2: 199–208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henson P. W., Fox R. A. A relationship between the percentage of calcium by mass and the effective atomic number of regions containing bone. Physics in Medicine and Biology 1984; 29: 979–984
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker R. P., Hobday P. A., Cassell K. J. The direct use of CT numbers in radiotherapy dosage calculations for inhomogenous media. Physics in Medicine and Biology 1979; 24: 802–809
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henson P. W., Fox R. A. The electron density of bone for inhomogeneity correction in radiotherapy planning using CT numbers. Physics in Medicine and Biology 1984; 29: 351–359
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubal L., Wiggli U. Tomochemistry of the brain. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 1977; 1: 300–307
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutherford R. A., Pullan B. R., Isherwood I. X-ray energies for effective atomic number determination. Neuroradiology 1976; 11: 23–28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson D. F., Hawkes D. J. X-ray attenuation coefficients of elements and mixtures. Physics Reports (Physics Letters C) 1981; 70: 169–233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks R. A., Mitchell L. G., O'Connor C. M., Di Chiro G. On the relationship between computed tomography numbers and specific gravity. Physics in Medicine and Biology 1981; 26: 141–147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Chiro G., Brooks R. A., Kessler R. M., Johnston G. S., Jones E., Herdt J. R., Sheridan W. T. Tissue signatures with dual-energy computed tomography. Radiology 1979; 131: 521–523
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson D. F., Hawkes D. J. Energy dependence in the spectral factor approach to computed tomography. Physics in Medicine and Biology 1983; 28: 289–293
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkes D. J., Jackson D. F., Parker R. P. Tissue analysis by dual-energy computed tomography. British Journal of Radiology 1986; 59: 537–542
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tothill P. Methods of bone mineral measurement. Physics in Medicine and Biology 1989; 34(5)543–572
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruegsegger P., Elasser U., Anliker M., Gnehm H., Kind H., Prader A. Quantitation of bone mineralisation using computed tomography. Radiology 1976; 121: 93–97
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosie C. J., Smith D. A. S. Precision of measurement of bone density with a special purpose computed tomography scanner. British Journal of Radiology 1986; 59: 345–350
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cann C. E., Genant H. K. Precise measurement of vertebral mineral content using computed tomography. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 1980; 4: 493–500
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genant H. K., Boyd D. Quantitative bone mineral analysis using dual energy computed tomography. Investigative Radiology 1977; 12: 545–551
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laval-Jeantet A. M., Cann C. E., Roger B., Dallant P. A postprocessing dual energy technique for vertebral CT densitometry. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 1984; 8: 1164–1167
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genant H., Boyd D., Rosenfeld D., Abols Y., Cann C. E. Computed tomography. Non-invasive Measurements of Bone Mass and their Clinical Application, S. H. Cohn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida 1981; 121–149
   Google Scholar
• Cann C. E. Quantitative CT for determination of bone mineral density: a review. Radiology 1988; 166: 509–522
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalender W. A., Suess C. A new calibration phantom for quantitative computed tomography. Medical Physics 1987; 14: 863–866
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawley E. O. The determination of elemental composition by quantitative computed tomography. PhD thesis, University of Wales College of Medicine. 1989; 292–298
   Google Scholar
• Mazess R. B. Errors in measuring trabecular bone by computed tomography due to marrow and bone composition. Calcified Tissue International 1983; 35: 148–152
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawley E. O., Evans W. D., Owen G. M. A theoretical analysis of the accuracy of single energy CT bone mineral measurements. Physics in Medicine and Biology 1988; 33: 1113–1127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genant H. K., Block J. E., Steiger P., Glueer C., Smith R. Quantitative computed tomography in assessment of osteoporosis. Seminars in Nuclear Medicine 1987; 17: 316–333
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiansen C., Rodbro P. Long term reproducibility of bone mineral content measurements. Scandinavian Journal of Clinical Laboratory Investigation 1977; 37: 321–323
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cann C. E., Genant H. K., Kolb F. O., Ettinger B. Quantitative computed tomography for prediction of vertebral fracture risk. Bone 1985; 6: 1–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compston J. E., Evans W. D., Crawley E. O., Evans C. Bone mineral content in normal UK subjects. British Journal of Radiology 1988; 61: 631–636
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henson P. W. Attenuation coefficient and atomic number calculation involving elements between hydrogen and zinc in the CT scanner energy range of 50 to 100 keV. Australasian Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine 1983; 6: 20–25
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ICRP. Report of the Task Group on Reference Man. Pergamon Press, Oxford 1975, publication 23
   Google Scholar
• Woodward H. Q., White D. R. The composition of body tissues. British Journal of Radiology 1986; 59: 1209–1219
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tofts P. S. Definitions of effective energy in computed tomography. Physics in Medicine and Biology 1981; 26: 313–317
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills S. R., Doppman J. L., Nienhuis A. W. Computed tomography in the diagnosis of disorders of excessive iron storage of the liver. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 1977; 1: 101–104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman R. W. G., Williams G., Bydder G., Dick R., Sherlock S., Kreel L. Computed tomography for determining liver iron content in primary haemochromatosis. British Medical Journal 1980; 280: 440–442
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kaneko T., Matsumoto M., Fukui K., Hori T., Katayama K. Clinical evaluation of thyroid CT values in various thyroid conditions. Journal of Computed Tomography 1979; 3: 1–4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Robinson P. J., Jones K. R. Improved control of respiration during computed tomography by feedback monitoring. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 1982; 6: 802–806
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee J. Y., Shank B., Bonfiglio P., Reid A. CT analysis of lung density changes in patients undergoing total body irradiation prior to bone marrow transplantation. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 1984; 8: 885–889
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zerhouni E. A., Spivey J. F., Morgan R. H., Leo F. P., Stitik F. P., Siegelman S. S. Factors influencing quantitative CT measurements of solitary pulmonary nodules. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 1982; 6: 1075–1087
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Checkley D. R., Zhu X. P., Antoun N., Chen S. Z., Isherwood I. An investigation into the problems of attenuation and area measurements made from CT images of pulmonary nodules. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 1984; 8: 237–243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fallone B. G., Moran P. R., Podgorsak E. B. Noninvasive thermometry with a clinical X-ray CT scanner. Medical Physics 1982; 9: 715–721
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar