Energy storage and release of prosthetic feet Part 1: Biomechanical analysis related to user benefits

References

• Arya A P, Lees A, Nirula H C, Klenerman L. A biomedical comparison of the SACH, Seattle and Jaipur feet using ground reaction forces. Prosthet Orthotlnt 1995; 19: 37–45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barth D G, Schumacher L, Sienko Thomas S. Gait analysis and energy cost of below-knee amputees wearing six different prosthetic feet. J Prosthet Orthot 1992; 4: 63–75
   Google Scholar
• Barr A E, Siegel K L. Biomechanical comparison of the energy-storing capabilities of SACH and Carbon Copy II prosthetic feet during the stance phase of gait in a person with below-knee amputation. Phys Ther 1992; 72(5)344–354
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blumentritt S, Scherer H W, Wellershaus U. Biomechanisch-ganganalystische bewertung von prothesanfüßen. Med Orth Tech 1994; 114: 287–292
   Google Scholar
• Casillas J-M, Dulieu V, Cohen M, Marcer I, Didier J P. Bioenergetic comparison of a new energy-storing foot and SACH foot in traumatic below-knee vascular amputations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 76: 39–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corcoran P J. Energy expenditure during ambulation. Physiological basis of rehabilitation medicine, JAR Downey, RC. Darling. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia 1971
   Google Scholar
• Donn J M, Roberts C. A review of the energy expenditure of disabled locomotion with special reference to lower limb amputees. Physiotherapy Theory Practice 1992; 8: 97–108
   Google Scholar
• Ehara Y, Beppu M, Nomura S, Kunimi Y, Takahashi S. Energy storing property of so-called energy-storing prosthetic feet. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1983; 74: 68–72
   Google Scholar
• Goh J CH, Tan P H, Toh S L, Tay T E. Gait analysis study of an energy-storing prosthetic foot - a preliminary report. Gait Posture 1994; 2: 95–101
   Google Scholar
• Hermodsson Y, Ekdahl C, Persson B M, Rozendal G. Gait in male trans-tibial amputees: a comparative study with healthy subjects in relation to walking speed. Prosthet Orthot Int 1994; 18: 68–77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Jaarsveld HWL, Grootenboer H J, De Vries J, Koopman H JFM. Stiffness and hysteresis properties of some prosthetic feet. Prosthet Orthot Int 1990; 14: 117–125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Jaarsveld HWL, Grootenboer H J, De Vrjes J. Accelerations due to impact at heel strike using below-knee prosthesis. Prosthet Orthot Int 1990; 14: 63–66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmann J F, Price R, Boswell-Bessette S, Daralle A. Comprehensive analysis of dynamic elastic response feet: Seattle Ankle/Lite foot Versus SACH foot. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74: 853–861
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menard M R, McBride M E, Sanderson D J, Murray D D. Comparative biomechanical analysis of energy-storing prosthetic feet. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992; 73: 451–458
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry J, Shanefield S. Efficiency of dynamic elastic response prosthetic feet. J Rehabil Res Dev 1993; 30(1)137–143
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sacchetti R, Schmidl H, Mv Groningen. Orienterende undersuchung liber energie-speidherung und energierückgabe von prothesenfüßen. Med Orth Tech 1994; 114: 293–295
   Google Scholar
• Schneider K, Hart T., Zernicke R F, Setoguchi Y, Oppenheim W. Below-knee child-amputee gait: SACH foot verus FLEX foot In: European Symposium on Clinical Gait Analysis, April 1–3, 1992. Laboratorium für Biomechanik der ETH Zürich, Zurich 1992
   Google Scholar
• Torburn L, Perry J, Ayyappa E, Shanfield S L. Below-knee amputee gait with dynamic elastic response prosthetic feet: a pilot study. J Rehabil Res Dev 1990; 27: 369–384
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Torburn L, Powers C M, Guiterez R, Perry J. Energy expenditure during ambulation in dysvascular and traumatic below-knee amputees: a comparison of five prosthetic feet. J Rehabil Res Dev 1995; 32: 111–119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner J, Sienko S, Supan T, Barth D. Motion analysis of SACH vs. Flex-Foot in moderately active below-knee amputees. Clin Prosthet Orthot 1987; 1: 55–62
   Google Scholar
• Winter D A, Sienko S E. Biomechanics of below-knee amputee gait. J Biomech 1988; 21: 361–376
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirta R W, Mason R, Calvo K, Golbranson F L. Effect on gait using various prosthetic ankle-foot devices. J Rehabil Res Dev 1991; 28(2)13–24
   PubMedGoogle Scholar