Energy storage and release of prosthetic feet Part 2: Subjective ratings of 2 energy storing and 2 conventional feet, user choice of foot and deciding factor

References

• Alaranta H, Kinnunen A, Karkkainen M, Pohjalainen T, Heuovaara M. Practical benefits of flex-foot in below-knee amputees. J Prosthet Orthot 1991; 3: 179–181
   Google Scholar
• Alaranta H, Lemptnen V M, Haavisto E, Pohjolainen T, Huri H. Subjective benefits of energy storing prosthesis. Prosthet Orthot Int 1994; 18: 92–97
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Amblard B, Assaiante C, Cremieux J, Marchand A R. From posture to gait: which sensory input for which function. Disorders of posture and gait, T Brandt, W Paulus, W Bles, M Dieterich, S Krafczyk, A. Straube. Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart 1990; l68–176
   Google Scholar
• Von Buchold G. Der multiflex-fuß: erste klinische erfahrungen. Med Orth Tech 1991; 2: 96–99
   Google Scholar
• Burgess E M, Poggi D L, Hittenberger D A, Zettl J H, Moeller D E, Carpenter KL, Forsgren S M. Der VA-Seattle-Fuß. Med Orth Tech 1987; 1: 24–26
   Google Scholar
• Casillas J M, Dulieu V, Cohen M, Marcer I, Didier J P. Bioenergetic comparison of a new energy storing foot and SACH foot in patients with traumatic below-knee vascular amputations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 76: 39–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colborne G R, Naumann S, Longmuir P E, Berbrayer D. Analysis of mechanical and metabolic factors in the gait of congenital below-knee amputees: a comparison of the SACH and Seattle feeL. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1992; 71: 212–216
   Google Scholar
• Ehara Y, Beppu M, Nomura S, Kunimi Y, Takahashi S. Energy storing property of so-called energy storing prosthetic feet. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74: 68–72
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gauthier-Gagnon C, Grisé MC. Prosthetic profile of the amputee questionnaire: validity and reliability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75: 1309–1314
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geurts A CH. Central adaptation of postural organisation to peripheral sensorimotor impairments. Nijmegen. 1992, Thesis. (ISBN: 90–373–0159–2)
   Google Scholar
• Goh J CH, Solomonidis S E, Spence W D, Paul J P. Biomechanical evaluation of SACH and uniaxial feet. Prosthet Orthot Int 1984; 8: 147–154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goh J CH, Tan P H, Toh S L, Tay T E. Gait analysis study of an energy-storing prosthetic foot - a preliminary report. Gait Posture 1994; 2: 95–101
   Google Scholar
• Grisé MCL, Gauthier-Gagnon C, Martineau G G. Prosthetic profile of people with lower extremity amputation: conception and design of a follow-up questionnaire. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74: 862–870
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James K LB, Stein R B. Improved ankle-foot system for above-knee amputees. Am J of Phys Med 1986; 65: 301–314
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lehmann J F, Price R, Boswell-Bessette S, Dralle A. Comprehensive analysis of dynamic elastic response feet Seattle Ankle/Lite foot Versus SACH Foot. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74: 853–861
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macfarlane P A, Nielsen D H, Shur D G, Meter C P. Perception of walking difficulty by below-knee amputees using a conventional foot versus the flex-foot. J Prosthet Orthot 1991; 3: 114–119
   Google Scholar
• Menard M R, McBride M E, Sanderson D J, Murray D D. Comparative biomechanical analysis of energy-storing prosthetic feet. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992; 73: 451–458
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson C C. A survey of amputees: functional level and life satisfaction, information needs, and the prosthetist's role. J Prosthet Orthot 1991; 3: 125–129
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen D H, Shur D G, Golden J C, Meier K. Comparison of energy cost and gait eficiency during ambulation in below-knee amputees using different prosthetic feet - a preliminary report. J Posthet Orthot 1989; 1: 24–31
   Google Scholar
• Postema K, Hermens H J, De Vrtes J, Koopman H FJM., Eisma W H. Energy storage and release of prosthetic feet, part 1: biomechanical analysis related to user benefit. Prosthet Orthot Int 1997; 21: 17–27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacchetti R, Schmidl H, Groningen M V. Orienterende untersuchung über energiespeidherung und energierückgave von prothesenfüßen. Med Orth Tech 1994; 114: 293–295
   Google Scholar
• SIG. National Medical Register, Health Care Information. Personnel information 1995
   Google Scholar
• Torburn L, Perry J, Ayyappa E, Shanfield S L. Below-knee amputee gait with dynamic elastic response prosthetic feet: a pilot study. J Rehabil Res Dev 1990; 27: 369–384
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wirta R W, Mason R, Calvo K, Golbranson F L. Effect on gait using various prosthetic ankle-foot devices. J Rehabil Res Dev 1991; 28: 13–24
   PubMedGoogle Scholar