Bone-tissue engineering: complex tunable structural and biological responses to injury, drug delivery, and cell-based therapies

References

• Abbasi M, Hashemi B. (2014). Fabrication and characterization of bioactive glass-ceramic using soda-lime-silica waste glass. Mater Sci Eng C 37:399–404
   Google Scholar
• Agarwal-Harding KJ, Meara JG, Greenberg SL, et al. (2015). Estimating the global incidence of femoral fracture from road traffic collisions: a literature review. J Bone Joint Surg 97:e31
   Google Scholar
• Aggarwal S, Pittenger MF. (2005). Human mesenchymal stem cells modulate allogeneic immune cell responses. Blood 105:1815–1822
   Google Scholar
• Alobeedallah H, Ellis JL, Rohanizadeh R, et al. (2011). Preparation of nanostructured hydroxyapatite in organic lvents for clinical applications. Trends Biomater Artif Organs 25:12–19
   Google Scholar
• Anil S, Al-Sulaimani AF, Beeran A, et al. (2015). Drug delivery systems in bone regeneration and implant dentistry. In: Current concepts in dental implantology. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech, 239–265
   Google Scholar
• AO Foundation. (2010). AO Surgery Reference Duebendorf, Switzerland: AO Education Institute
   Google Scholar
• Auer JA, Grainger DW. (2015). Fracture management in horses: Where have we been and where are we going? Vet J 206:5–14
   Google Scholar
• Bakry AS, Tamura Y, Otsuki M, et al. (2011). Cytotoxicity of 45S5 bioglass paste used for dentine hypersensitivity treatment. J Dentistry 39:599–603
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes GL, Kostenuik PJ, Gerstenfeld LC, Einhorn TA. (1999). Growth factor regulation of fracture repair. J Bone Mineral Res 14:1805–1815
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry FP, Murphy JM. (2014). Mesenchymal stem cells: clinical applications and biological characterization. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 36:568–584
   Google Scholar
• Bassett CA. (1987). Bone biology. Sci Mag 236:11
   Google Scholar
• Bayart E, Cohen-Haguenauer O. (2013). Technological overview of iPS induction from human adult somatic cells. Curr Gene Ther 13:73–92
   Google Scholar
• Bayer IS, Ghosh A, Labriola M, et al. (2013). Fabrication of bionanocomposites comprising flat nanocrystals of calcium in collagen fibers exhibiting hardness comparable to metal. RSC Adv 3:20315–20323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertuglia A, Bullone M, Rossotto F, Gasparini M. (2014). Epidemiology of musculoskeletal injuries in a population of harness Standardbred racehorses in training. BMC Veterinary Res 10:11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhardwaj N, Kundu SC. (2010). Electrospinning: A fascinating fiber fabrication technique. Biotechnol Adv 28:325–347
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binderman I, Yaffe A, Samuni Y, et al. (2011). Tissue engineering of bone. Chapter 4. In: Critical evaluation of scaffold selection. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech, 83–94
   Google Scholar
• Biswas A, Bayer IS, Zhao H, et al. (2010). Design and synthesis of biomimetic multicomponent all-bone-minerals bionanocomposites. Biomacromolecules 11:2545–2549
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biswas A, Ovaert TC, Slaboch C, et al. (2011). Mineral concentration dependent modulation of mechanical properties of bone-inspired bionanocomposite scaffold. Appl Physs Lett 99:1–4
   Google Scholar
• Blaker J, Nazhat S, Bismarck A, et al. (2003). In vitro evaluation of novel bioresorbable and bioactive composites based on Bioglassr-filled polylactide foams as bone tissue engineering scaffolds: Dynamic mechanical analysis and surface characterisation. J Biomed Mater Res A 67A:1401–1411
   Google Scholar
• Bondurant FJ, Cotler H, Buckle R, et al. (1988). The medical and economic impact of severely injured lower extremities. J Trauma 28:1270–1273
   Google Scholar
• Bose S, Vahabzadeh S, Bandyopadhyay A. (2013). Bone tissue engineering using 3D printing. Mater Today 16:496–504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhandayuthapani B, Yoshida Yo, Maekawa T, Kumar D. (2011). Polymeric Scaffolds in tissue engineering application: a review. Int J Polym Sci 2011:290602
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckwalter JA, Glimcher MJ, Becker RR. (1995). Bone biology. J Bone Joint Surgery (Intructional Course Lecture) 77:1256–1275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caplan AI. (2009). Why are MSCs therapeutic? New data: new insight. J Pathol 217:318–324
   Google Scholar
• Carano RAD, Filvaroff EH. (2003). Angiogenesis and bone repair. Drug Discov Today 8:980–989
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter-Arnold JL, Neilsen N, Amelse LL, et al. (2012). In vitro analysis of equine, bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells demonstrates differences within age- and gender-matched horses. Equine Vet J 46:589–595
   Google Scholar
• Castro C, Évora C, Baro M, et al. (2005). Two-month ciprofloxacin implants for multibacterial bone infections. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 60:401–406
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee K, Kraigsley AM, Bolikal D, et al. (2012). Gas-foamed Scaffold gradients for combinatorial screening in 3D. J Funct Biomater 3:173–182
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen H, Yuan L, Song W, et al. (2008a). Biocompatible polymer materials: Role of protein-surface interactions. Progr Polym Sci (Oxford) 33:1059–1087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Shao J, Xiang LX, et al. (2008b). Mesenchymal stem cells: A promising candidate in regenerative medicine. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 40:815–820
   Google Scholar
• Clinic M. Patient care & health info [Online]. Available from: http://www.mayoclinic.org/
   Google Scholar
• Cole JH, van der Meulen MCH. (2011). Whole bone mechanics and bone quality. Clin Orthopaedics Relat Res 469:2139–2149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crisan M, Yap S, Casteilla L, et al. (2008). A perivascular origin for mesenchymal stem cells in multiple human organs. Cell Stem Cell 3:301–313
   Google Scholar
• Croisier F, Jérôme C. (2013). Chitosan-based biomaterials for tissue engineering. Eur Polym J 49:780–792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz Villagran C, Amelse L, Neilsen N, et al. (2014). Differentiation of equine mesenchymal stromal cells into cells of neural lineage: potential for clinical applications. Stem Cells Int 2:e24931
   Google Scholar
• Darvin P, Joung YH, Yang YM. (2013). JAK2-STAT5B pathway and osteoblast differentiation. JAK-STAT 2:e24931
   Google Scholar
• Deng M, G. Kumbar S, Lo K, et al. (2011). Novel polymer-ceramics for bone repair and regeneration. Recent Patents Biomed Eng 4:168–184
   Google Scholar
• Dhandayuthapani B, Yoshida Y, Maekawa T, Kumar DS. (2011). Polymeric scaffolds in tissue engineering application: A review. Int J Polym Sci 2011:290602
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diab T, Pritchard EM, Uhrig BA, et al. (2012). A silk hydrogel-based delivery system of bone morphogenetic protein for the treatment of large bone defects. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 11:123–131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Digirolamo CM, Stokes D, Colter D, et al. (1999). Propagation and senescence of human marrow stromal cells in culture: A simple colony-forming assay identifies samples with the greatest potential to propagate and differentiate. Br J Haematol 107:275–281
   Google Scholar
• Dominici M, Le Blanc K, Mueller I, et al. (2006). Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement. Cytotherapy 8:315–317
   Google Scholar
• Druecke D, Langer S, Lamme E, et al. (2004). Neovascularization of poly(ether ester) block-copolymer scaffolds in vivo: Long-term investigations using intravital fluorescent microscopy. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 68:10–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards SL, Mitchell W, Matthews JB, et al. (2004). Design of nonwoven scaffold structures for tissue engineering of the anterior cruciate ligament. Autex Res J 4:86–94
   Google Scholar
• Elkhenany H, Amelse L, Lafont A, et al. (2015). Graphene supports in vitro proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of goat adult mesenchymal stem cells: Potential for bone tissue engineering. J Appl Toxicol 35:367–374
   Google Scholar
• Fackelman GE, Murphy WM, Renner M, RüEdi TP. (2000). AO principles of fracture management [AO teaching videos on CD-ROM]. Stuttgart: Thieme
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira AM, Gentile P, Chiono V, Ciardelli G. (2012). Collagen for bone tissue regeneration. Acta Biomaterialia 8:3191–3200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkemeier CG. (2002). Bone-grafting and bone-graft substitutes. J Bone Joint Surgery 84:454–464
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fong EL, Watson B, Kasper FK, et al. (2012). Building bridges: Leveraging interdisciplinary collaborations in the development of biomaterials to meet clinical needs. Adv Mater 24:4995–5013
   Google Scholar
• Fratzl P. (2005). Hierarchical structure and mechanical adaptation of biological materials. In: Reis RL, Weiner S, eds. Learning from nature how to design new implantable biomaterialsis: from biomineralization fundamentals to biomimetic materials and processing routes. Vol. 171. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Springer, 15–34
   Google Scholar
• Geiger M, Li RH, Friess W. (2003). Collagen sponges for bone regeneration with rhBMP-2. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 55:1613–1629
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geris L, Gerisch A, Sloten JV, et al. (2008). Angiogenesis in bone fracture healing: A bioregulatory model. J Theoretical Biol 251:137–158
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleeson JP, Brien FJO. (2007). Composite Scaffolds for orthopaedic regenerative medicine. In: Advances in composite materials for medicine and nanotechnology. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech, 2–58
   Google Scholar
• Glenn JD, Whartenby KA. (2014). Mesenchymal stem cells: Emerging mechanisms of immunomodulation and therapy. World J Stem Cells 6:526–539
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein AS, Juarez TM, Helmke CD, et al. (2001). Effect of convection on osteoblastic cell growth and function in biodegradable polymer foam scaffolds. Culture 22:1279–1288
   Google Scholar
• Guo H, Su J, Wei J, et al. (2009). Biocompatibility and osteogenicity of degradable Ca-deficient hydroxyapatite scaffolds from calcium phosphate cement for bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 5:268–278
   Google Scholar
• Haugen H, Ried V, Brunner M, et al. (2004). Water as foaming agent for open cell polyurethane structures. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 15:343–346
   Google Scholar
• Health, U. S. N. I. O. A service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health ClinicalTrials.gov
   Google Scholar
• Henslee AM, Gwak D, Mikos AG, et al. (2012). Development of a biodegradable bone cement for craniofacial applications. J Biomed Mater Res A 100A:2252–2259
   Google Scholar
• Hong Y, Song H, Gong Y, et al. (2007). Covalently crosslinked chitosan hydrogel: Properties of in vitro degradation and chondrocyte encapsulation. Acta Biomater 3:23–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoogduijn MJ, Betjes MG, Baan CC. (2014). Mesenchymal stromal cells for organ transplantation: different sources and unique characteristics? Curr Opin Organ Transplant 19:41–46
   Google Scholar
• Hossan Y, Molla AI, Islam S, Rana AA. (2012). Fabrication and characterization of polyvinyl alcohol-hydroxyapatite biomimetic scaffold by freeze thawing in situ synthesized hybrid suspension for bone tissue engineering. Int J Emerg Technol Adv Eng. 2:696–701
   Google Scholar
• Hsiao St, Asgari A, Lokmic Z, et al. (2012). Comparative analysis of paracrine factor expression in human adult mesenchymal stem cells derived from bone marrow, adipose, and dermal tissue. Stem cells Dev 21:2189–2203
   Google Scholar
• Hua-Chiang W, Yao-Nan L, Sheng-Rui J, et al. (2007). Observation of growth of human fibroblasts on silver nanoparticles. J Phys Conf Sers 61:445
   Google Scholar
• Hui JH, Ren X, Afizah MH, et al. (2013). Oligo[poly(ethylene glycol)fumarate] hydrogel enhances osteochondral repair in porcine femoral condyle defects. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:1174–1185
   Google Scholar
• Ibrahim BA, Kadum KM. (2012). Morphology studies and mechanical properties for PS/SBS blends. IJET-IJENS 12:19–27
   Google Scholar
• Imai Y, Youn MY, Inoue K, et al. (2013). Nuclear receptors in bone physiology and diseases. Physiol Rev 93:481–523
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janik H, Marzec M. (2015). A review: Fabrication of porous polyurethane scaffolds. Mater Sci Eng C 48:586–591
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javazon EH, Beggs K, Flake AW, Flake AW. (2004). Mesenchymal stem cells: paradoxes of passaging. Exp Hematol 32:414–425
   Google Scholar
• Jiang Y, Jahagirdar BN, Reinhardt RL, et al. (2002). Pluripotency of mesenchymal stem cells derived from adult marrow. Nature 418:41–49
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karande TS, Ong JL, Agrawal CM. (2004). Diffusion in musculoskeletal tissue engineering scaffolds: design issues related to porosity, permeability, architecture, and nutrient mixing. Ann Biomed Eng 32:1728–1743
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katsara O, Mahaira L, Iliopoulou EG, et al. (2011). Effects of donor age, gender, and in vitro cellular aging on the phenotypic, functional, and molecular characteristics of mouse bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells Dev 20:1549–1561
   Google Scholar
• Keating JF, Mcqueen MM. (2001). Substitutes for autologous bone graft in orthopaedic trauma. J Bone Joint Surg 83:3–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keilhoff G, Stang F, Goihl A, et al. (2006). Transdifferentiated mesenchymal stem cells as alternative therapy in supporting nerve regeneration and myelination. Cell Mol Neurobiol 26:1233–1250
   Google Scholar
• Khanna R, Katti K, Katti D. (2009). Nanomechanics of surface modified nanohydroxyapatite particulates used in biomaterials. J Eng Mech 135:468–478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim J, Mcbride S, Tellis B, et al. (2012). Rapid-prototyped PLGA/beta-TCP/hydroxyapatite nanocomposite scaffolds in a rabbit femoral defect model. Biofabrication 4:025003
   Google Scholar
• Kim SS, Sun Park M, Jeon O, et al. (2006). Poly(lactide-co-glycolide)/hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 27:1399–1409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kini U, Nandeesh BN. (2012). Physiology of bone formation, remodeling, and metabolism. In: Fogelman I, Gnanasegaran G, van der Wall H, eds. Radionuclide and hybrid bone imaging. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer
   Google Scholar
• Ko YG, Kawazoe N, Tateishi T, Guoping C. (2010). Preparation of novel collagen sponges using an ice particulate template. J Bioactive Compatible Polym 25:360–373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Kruth JP. (2010). Composites by rapid prototyping technology. Mater Design 31:850–856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kupcova Skalnikova H. (2013). Proteomic techniques for characterisation of mesenchymal stem cell secretome. Biochimie 95:2196–2211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurtz A. 2008. Mesenchymal stem cell delivery routes and fate. Int J Stem Cells 1:1–7
   Google Scholar
• Kustra S, Bettinger CJ. (2012). Smart polymers and interfaces for dynamic cell-biomaterials interactions. MRS Bull 37:836–846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam CXF, Mo XM, Teoh SH, Hutmacher DW. (2002). Scaffold development using 3D printing with a starch-based polymer. Mater Sci Eng C 20:49–56
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam J, Truong NF, Segura T. (2014). Design of cell-matrix interactions in hyaluronic acid hydrogel scaffolds. Acta Biomaterialia 10:1571–1580
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lebourg M, Sabater Serra R, Más Estellés J, et al. (2008). Biodegradable polycaprolactone scaffold with controlled porosity obtained by modified particle-leaching technique. J Mater Sci 19:2047–2053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee J, Yoo J, Atala A, et al. (2012). The effect of controlled release of PDGF-BB from heparin-conjugated electrospun PCL/gelatin scaffolds on cellular bioactivity and infiltration. Biomaterials 33:6709–6720
   Google Scholar
• Lee SH, Shin H. (2007). Matrices and scaffolds for delivery of bioactive molecules in bone and cartilage tissue engineering. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 59:339–359
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li WJ, Laurencin CT, Caterson EJ, et al. (2002). Electrospun nanofibrous structure: A novel scaffold for tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res 60:613–621
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Xiong J, Hodgson PD, Wen CE. (2010). Effects of structural property and surface modification of Ti6Ta4Sn scaffolds on the response of SaOS2 cells for bone tissue engineering. J Alloys Compds 494:323–329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Ramay HR, Hauch KD, et al. (2005). Chitosan–alginate hybrid scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 26:3919–3928
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lian JB, Stein GS, van Wijnen AJ, et al. (2012). MicroRNA control of bone formation and homeostasis. Nat Rev Endocrinol 8:212–227
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin Y, Wang L, Zhang P, et al. (2006). Surface modification of poly(L-lactic acid) to improve its cytocompatibility via assembly of polyelectrolytes and gelatin. Acta Biomaterialia 2:155–164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liotta F, Angeli R, Cosmi L, et al. (2008). Toll-like receptors 3 and 4 are expressed by human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells and can inhibit their T-cell modulatory activity by impairing Notch signaling. Stem Cells 26:279–289
   Google Scholar
• Lipowiecki M, Ryvolová M, Töttösi Á, et al. (2014). Permeability of rapid prototyped artificial bone scaffold structures. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 4127–4135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu SQ, Tay R, Khan M, et al. (2010). Synthetic hydrogels for controlled stem cell differentiation. Soft Matter 6:67
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu X, Ma P. (2004). Polymeric scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Ann Biomed Eng 32:477–486
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCord KM. (2012). Embryo project encyclopedia. Arizona State University. School of Life Sciences. Center for Biology and Society. Available from: http://embryo.asu.edu/handle/10776/3941
   Google Scholar
• Maggini J, Mirkin G, Bognanni I, et al. (2010). Mouse bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells turn activated macrophages into a regulatory-like profile. PLoS One 5:e9252
   Google Scholar
• Mahmood M, Villagarcia H, Dervishi E, et al. (2013). Role of carbonaceous nanomaterials in stimulating osteogenesis in mammalian bone cells. J Mater Chem B 1:3220–3230
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manuscript A. (2012). NIH public access. Changes 29:997–1003
   Google Scholar
• Mariani E, Facchini A. (2012). Clinical applications and biosafety of human adult mesenchymal stem cells. Curr Pharmaceut Design 18:1821–1845
   Google Scholar
• Maurus PB, Kaeding CC. (2004). Bioabsorbable implant material review. Oper Techniques Sports Med 12:158–160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng W, Kim SY, Yuan J, et al. (2007). Electrospun PHBV/collagen composite nanofibrous scaffolds for tissue engineering. J Biomater Sci 18:81–94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller CW. (1986). Textbook of small animal orthopedics. Can Vet J 27:263–263
   Google Scholar
• Mohamad Yunos D, Bretcanu O, Boccaccini AR. (2008). Polymer-bioceramic composites for tissue engineering scaffolds. J Mater Sci 43:4433–4442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouriño V, Boccaccini AR. (2009). Bone tissue engineering therapeutics: controlled drug delivery in three-dimensional scaffolds. J Roy Soci Interface 7:209–227
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouriño V, Cattalini JP, Roether JA, et al. (2013). Composite polymer-bioceramic scaffolds with drug delivery capability for bone tissue engineering. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 10:1353–1365
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller ME. (1987). Distal radius. In: Müller ME, Nazarian S, Koch P, Schatzker J, eds. AO classification of fractures. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 106–115
   Google Scholar
• Nair LS, Laurencin CT. (2007). Biodegradable polymers as biomaterials. Progress Polym Sci (Oxford) 32:762–798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nandakumar A, Barradas A, De Boer J, et al. (2013). Combining technologies to create bioactive hybrid scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomatter 3:e23705
   Google Scholar
• Nejadnik MR, Mikos A, Jansen JA, et al. (2012). Facilitating the mineralization of oligo(poly(ethylene glycol) fumarate) hydrogel by incorporation of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles. J Biomed Mater Res A 100A:1316–1323
   Google Scholar
• Nie L, Chen D, Suo J, et al. (2012). Physicochemical characterization and biocompatibility in vitro of biphasic calcium phosphate/polyvinyl alcohol scaffolds prepared by freeze-drying method for bone tissue engineering applications. Colloids Surfaces B 100:169–176
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’brien FJ. (2011). Biomaterials & scaffolds for tissue engineering. Mater Today 14:88–95
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office of the Surgeon General, R., MD. (2004). Bone health and osteoporosis: A report of the surgeon general. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Surgeon General
   Google Scholar
• Oh S, Daraio C, Chen LH, et al. (2006). Significantly accelerated osteoblast cell growth on aligned TiO2 nanotubes. J Biomed Mater Res A 78:97–103
   Google Scholar
• Orza AI, Mihu C, Soritau O, et al. (2014). Multistructural biomimetic substrates for controlled cellular differentiation. Nanotechnology 25:1–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osathanon T, Linnes ML, Rajachar RM, et al. (2008). Microporous nanofibrous fibrin-based scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 29:4091–4099
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettikiriarachchi JTS, Parish CL, Nisbet DR, Forsythe JS. (2007). Architectural and surface modification of nanofibrous scaffolds for tissue engineering. In: Nanotechnologies for the life sciences. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9783527610419.ntls0258/abstract.
   Google Scholar
• Phinney DG, Kopen G, Righter W, et al. (1999). Donor variation in the growth properties and osteogenic potential of human marrow stromal cells. J Cell Biochem 75:424–436
   Google Scholar
• Phinney DG, Sensebe L. (2013). Mesenchymal stromal cells: misconceptions and evolving concepts. Cytotherapy 15:140–145
   Google Scholar
• Pilliar RM, Filiaggi M, Wells JD, et al. (2001). Porous calcium polyphosphate scaffolds for bone substitute applications – in vitro characterization. Biomaterials 22:963–972
   Google Scholar
• Prockop DJ. (1997). Marrow stromal cells as stem cells for nonhematopoietic tissues. Science 276:71–74
   Google Scholar
• Puppi D, Chiellini F, Piras AM, Chiellini E. (2010). Polymeric materials for bone and cartilage repair. Prog Polym Science 35:403–440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin A, Cheng TS, Pavlos NJ, et al. 2012. V-ATPases in osteoclasts: Structure, function and potential inhibitors of bone resorption. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 44:1422–1435
   Google Scholar
• Rahman CV, Kuhn G, White LJ, et al. (2013). PLGA/PEG-hydrogel composite scaffolds with controllable mechanical properties. J Biomed Mater Res Part B 101:648–655
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranganathan SI, Yoon D, Henslee AM, et al. (2010). Shaping the micromechanical behavior of multi-phase composites for bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 6:3448–3456
   Google Scholar
• Rathbone MJ, Cardinal JR, Ogle CR. (2000). Chapter 2 – Mechanisms of drug release from veterinary drug delivery systems. In: Gurny MJR, ed. Controlled release veterinary drug delivery. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 17–50
   Google Scholar
• Renno AC, van de Watering F, Nejadnik MR, et al. (2013). Incorporation of bioactive glass in calcium phosphate cement: An evaluation. Acta Biomater 9:5728–5739
   Google Scholar
• Rho JY, Kuhn-Spearing L, Zioupos P. (1998). Mechanical properties and the hierarchical structure of bone. Med Eng Phys 20:92–102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roemeling-Van Rhijn M, Khairoun M, Korevaar SS, et al. (2013). Human bone marrow- and adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stromal cells are immunosuppressive and in a humanized allograft rejection model. J Stem Cell Res Ther 6:1–15
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau M, Anderson D, Lillich JD, et al. (2014). In vivo assessment of a multicomponent and nanostructural polymeric matrix as a delivery system for antimicrobials and bone morphogenetic protein-2 in a unicortical tibial defect in goats. Am J Vet Res 75:240–250
   Google Scholar
• Ryszkowska JL, Auguścik M, Sheikh A, Boccaccini AR. (2010). Biodegradable polyurethane composite scaffolds containing Bioglass® for bone tissue engineering. Composites Sci Technol 70:1894–1908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakaguchi Y, Sekiya I, Yagishita K, et al. (2005). Comparison of human stem cells derived from various mesenchymal tissues: superiority of synovium as a cell source. Arthritis Rheumat 52:2521–2529
   Google Scholar
• San Miguel B, Kriauciunas R, Tosatti S, et al. (2010). Enhanced osteoblastic activity and bone regeneration using surface-modified porous bioactive glass scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res A 94:1023–1033
   Google Scholar
• Schindeler A, Mcdonald MM, Bokko P, Little DG. (2008). Bone remodeling during fracture repair: The cellular picture. Semin Cell Dev Biol 19:459–466
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidmaier G, Schwabe P, Strobel C, et al. (2008). Carrier systems and application of growth factors in orthopaedics. Injury 39:S37–S43
   Google Scholar
• Services DOHH. (2011). Stem cell basics [Online]. Available from: http://stemcells.nih.gov/info/basics/Pages/Default.aspx [last accessed 23 May 2011]
   Google Scholar
• Shim JH, Kim Jyfau, Park M, et al. (2011). Development of a hybrid scaffold with synthetic biomaterials and hydrogel using solid freeform fabrication technology. Biofabrication 3:034102
   Google Scholar
• Shue L, Yufeng Z ,Fau-Mony U. (2012). Biomaterials for periodontal regeneration: A review of ceramics and polymers. Biomatter 2:271–277
   Google Scholar
• Sill TJ, Von Recum HA. (2008). Electrospinning: Applications in drug delivery and tissue engineering. Biomaterials 29:1989–2006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivertsen K. 2007. Polymer foams. Polym Phys. Mater Sci Eng Polym Phys 1–16
   Google Scholar
• Smith LA, Ma PX. (2004). Nano-fibrous scaffolds for tissue engineering. Colloids Surfaces B 39:125–131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• St. Jean G, Anderson DE. (2014). Decision analysis for fracture management in cattle. Vet Clin N Am 30:1–10
   Google Scholar
• Stevens MM, George JH. (2005). Exploring and engineering the cell surface interface. Science 310:1135–1138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takei J. (2006). 3-Dimensional cell culture scaffold for everyone: Drug screening, tissue engineering and cancer biology. Alternat Anim Test Experiment 11:170–176
   Google Scholar
• Tan H, Marra KG. (2010). Injectable, biodegradable hydrogels for tissue engineering applications. Materials 3:1746–1767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan KH, Chua CK, Leong KF, et al. (2003). Scaffold development using selective laser sintering of polyetheretherketone-hydroxyapatite biocomposite blends. Biomaterials 24:3115–3123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thadavirul N, Pavasant P, Supaphol P. (2013). Development of polycaprolactone porous scaffolds by combining solvent casting, particulate leaching, and polymer leaching techniques for bone tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res Part A. [Epub ahead of print]. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.35010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thevenot P, Hu W, Tang L. (2008). Surface chemistry influence implant biocompatibility. Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry, 8:270–280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thibault RA, Mikos AGFAU, Kasper FK, Kasper FK. (2013). Scaffold/Extracellular matrix hybrid constructs for bone-tissue engineering. Adv Healthcare Mater 2:13–24
   Google Scholar
• Thomas MV, Puleo DA. (2009). Calcium sulfate: Properties and clinical applications. J Biomed Mater Res Part B 88:597–610
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner CH, Robling AG, Duncan RL, Burr DB. (2002). Do bone cells behave like a neuronal network? Calcified Tissue Int 70:435–442
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullah I, Subbarao RB, Rho GJ. (2015). Human mesenchymal stem cells – Current trends and future prospective. Biosci Rep 35:1–44
   Google Scholar
• Usui Y, Aoki K, Narita N, et al. (2008). Carbon nanotubes with high bone-tissue compatibility and bone-formation acceleration effects. Small 4:240–246
   Google Scholar
• Vögelin E, Jones NF, Huang JI, et al. (2005). Healing of a critical-sized defect in the rat femur with use of a vascularized periosteal flap, a biodegradable matrix, and bone morphogenetic protein. J Bone Joint Surg 87:1323–1331
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner W. (2012). Implications of long-term culture for mesenchymal stem cells: Genetic defects or epigenetic regulation? Stem Cell Res Ther 3:54
   Google Scholar
• Wahl DA, Czernuszka JT. (2006). Collagen-hydroxyapatite composites for hard tissue repair. Eur Cells Mater 11:43–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan CD, Cheng R, Wang HB, et al. (2008). Immunomodulatory effects of mesenchymal stem cells derived from adipose tissues in a rat orthotopic liver transplantation model. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 7:29–33
   Google Scholar
• Woesz A, Rumpler M, Stampfl J, et al. (2005). Towards bone replacement materials from calcium phosphates via rapid prototyping and ceramic gelcasting. Mater Sci Eng C 25:181–186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi C, Liu D, Fong CC, et al. (2010). Gold nanoparticles promote osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells through p38 MAPK pathway. ACS Nano 4:6439–6448
   Google Scholar
• Young JK. (2010). Introduction to cell biology. Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific
   Google Scholar
• Zaim M, Karaman S, Cetin G, et al. (1999). Donor age and long-term culture affect differentiation and proliferation of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Ann Hematol 91:1175–1186.
   Google Scholar
• Zein I, Hutmacher DW, Tan KC, Teoh SH. (2002). Fused deposition modeling of novel scaffold architectures for tissue engineering applications. Biomaterials 23:1169–1185
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng Q, Han Y, Li H, Chang J. (2014). Bioglass/alginate composite hydrogel beads as cell carriers for bone regeneration. J Biomed Mater Res Part B 102:42–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Webster TJ. (2009). Nanotechnology and nanomaterials: Promises for improved tissue regeneration. Nano Today 4:66–80
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang R, Ma PX. (1998). Porous poly (L-lactic acid)/apatite composites created by biomimetic process. J Biomed Mater Res 45:285–293
   Google Scholar
• Zhang S, Ellis-Behnke R, Zhao X. (2013). PuraMatrix: Self-assembling peptide nanofiber scaffolds. Chapter 15. In: Scaffolding in tissue engineering, 217–283
   Google Scholar
• Zhao J, Guo LY, Yang XB, Weng J. (2008). Preparation of bioactive porous HA/PCL composite scaffolds. Appl Surface Sci 255:2942–2946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu J. (2010). Bioactive modification of poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 31:4639–4656
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu N, Chen X. (2013). Biofabrication of tissue scaffolds. Chapter 12. In: Advances in biomaterials science and biomedical applications. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech, 315–328
   Google Scholar
• Zhu J, Marchant RE. (2011). Design properties of hydrogel tissue-engineering scaffolds. Expert Rev Med Dev 8:607–626
   Google Scholar