Influence of the coating formulation on enzymatic digestibility and drug release from 5-aminosalicylic acid pellets coated with mixtures of high-amylose starch and Surelease® intended for colon-specific drug delivery

References

• Ashford M, Fell JT. (1994). Targeting drugs to the colon: Delivery systems for oral administration. J Drug Target, 2:241–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saffran M, Kumar GS, Savariar C, Burnham JC, Williams F, Neckers DC. (1986). A new approach to the oral administration of insulin and other peptide drugs. Science, 233:1081–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson ST, McFarlane C, Hay S, McFarlane GT. (1989). Significance of microflora in proteolysis in the colon. Appl Environ Microbiol, 55:679–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dew MJ, Hughes PJ, Lee MG, Evans BK, Rhodes J. (1982). An oral preparation to release drugs in the human colon. Br J Clin Pharmacol, 14:405–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pozzi F, Furlani P, Gazzaniga A, Davis SS, Wilding IR. (1994). The TIME CLOCK® system: A new oral dosage form for fast and complete release of a drug after a predetermined lag time. J Control Release, 31:99–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebden JM, Wilson CG, Spiller RC, Gilchrist PJ, Blackshaw E, Frier ME, . (1999). Regional differences in quinine absorption from the undisturbed human colon assessed using timed-release delivery systems. Pharm Res, 16:1087–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gazzaniga A, Iamartino P, Maffione G, Sangalli ME. (1994). Oral delayed-release system for colonic specific delivery. Int J Pharm, 108:77–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilding IR, Davis SS, Pozzi F, Furlani P, Gazzaniga A. (1994). Enteric coated time release systems for colonic targeting. Int J Pharm, 111:99–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashford M, Fell JT, Attwood D, Sharma H, Woodhead PJ. (1993). An vivo investigation into the suitability of pH-dependent polymers for colonic targeting. Int J Pharm, 95:193–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashford M, Fell JT, Attwood D, Woodhead PJ. (1993). An in vitro investigation into the suitability of pH-dependent polymers for colonic targeting. Int J Pharm, 91:241–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashford M, Fell J, Attwood D, Sharma H, Woodhead P. (1993). An evaluation of pectin as a carrier for drug targeting to the colon. J Control Release, 26:213–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashford M, Fell J, Attwood D, Sharma H, Woodhead P. (1994). Studies on pectin formulations for colonic drug delivery. J Control Release, 30:225–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atyabi F, Inanloo K, Dinarvand R. (2005). Bovine serum albumin–loaded pectinate beads as colonic peptide delivery system: Preparation and in vitro characterization. Drug Deliv, 12:367–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnaiah YSR, Satyanarayana S, Rama Prasad YV, Narasimha Rao S. (1998). Evaluation of guar gum as a compression coat for drug targeting to colon. Int J Pharm, 171:137–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Hervás MJ, Fell JT. (1998). Pectin/chitosan mixtures as coatings for colon-specific drug delivery: An in vitro evaluation. Int J Pharm, 169:115–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akhgari A, Farahmand F, Afrasiabi Garekani H, Sadeghi F, Vandamme TF. (2006). Permeability and swelling studies on free films containing inulin in combination with different polymethacrylates aimed for colonic drug delivery. Eur J Pharm Sci, 28:307–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milojevic S, Newton JM, Cummings JH, Gibson GR, Louise Botham R, Ring SG, . (1996). Amylose as a coating for drug delivery to the colon: Preparation and in vitro evaluation using 5-aminosalicylic acid pellets. J Control Release, 38:75–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh B, Chauhan N, Kumar S. (2008). Radiation crosslinked psyllium and polyacrylic acid based hydrogels for use in colon specific drug delivery. Carbohydr Polym, 73:446–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan J, Wang K, Liu M, He Z. (2008). In vitro evaluations of konjac glucomannan and xanthan gum mixture as the sustained release material of matrix tablet. Carbohydr Polym, 73:241–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummings JH, Milojevic S, Harding M, Coward WA, Gibson GR, Botham RL, . (1996). In vivo studies of amylose- and ethylcellulose-coated [13C]glucose microspheres as a model for drug delivery to the colon. J Control Release, 40:123–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atyabi F, Manoochehri S, Moghadam SH, Dinarvand R. (2006). Cross-linked starch microspheres: Effect of cross-linking condition on the microsphere characteristics. Arch Pharm Res, 29:1179–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen L, Li X, Pang Y, Li L, Zhang X, Yu L. (2007). Resistant starch as a carrier for oral colon-targeting drug matrix system. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 18:2199–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alias J, Silva I, Goñi I, Gurruchaga M. (2008). Hydrophilic amylose-based graft copolymers for controlled protein release. Carbohydr Polym, 74:31–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen L, Li X, Li L, Guo S. (2007). Acetylated starch-based biodegradable materials with potential biomedical applications as drug delivery systems. Curr Appl Phys, 7:90–3.
   Google Scholar
• Freire C, Fertig CC, Podczeck F, Veiga F, Sousa J. (2009). Starch based coatings for colonic specific drug delivery. Part I: The influence of heat treatment on the physico-chemical properties of high-amylose maize starches. Eur J Pharm Biopharm, doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2009.02.008
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Freire C, Podczeck F, Veiga F, Sousa J. (2009). Starch based coatings for colon-specific delivery. Part II: Physico-chemical properties and in vitro drug release from high amylose maize starch films. Eur J Pharm Biopharm, doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2009.02.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fertig CC, Podczeck F, Jee RD, Smith MR. (2004). Feasibility study for the rapid determination of the amylose content in starch by near-infrared spectroscopy. Eur J Pharm Sci, 21:155–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pharmacopoeia B. (2008). Appendix IA, A63. London, UK: The Stationary Office.
   Google Scholar
• Michaelis L, Menten M. (1913). Die Kinetik der Invertinwirkung. Biochem Z, 49:333–69.
   Google Scholar
• Palviainen P, Heinämäki J, Myllärinen P, Lahtinen R, Yliuuusi J, Forssell P. (2001). Corn starches as film formers in aqueous-based film coating. Pharm Dev Technol, 6:351–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krogars K, Antikainen O, Heinämäki J, Laitinen N, Yliruusi J. (2002). Tablet film-coating with amylose-rich maize starch. Eur J Pharm Sci, 17:23–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubinstein A, Radai R, Ezra M, Pathak S, Rokem S. (1993). In vitro evaluation of calcium pectinate: A potential colon-specific drug delivery carrier. Pharm Res, 10:258–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turkoglu M, Ugurlu T. (2002). In vitro evaluation of pectin-HPMC compression coated 5-aminosalicylic acid tablets for colonic delivery. Eur J Pharm Biopharm, 53:65–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ugurlu T, Turkoglu M, Gurer US, Akarsu BG. (2007). Colonic delivery of compression coated nisin tablets using pectin/HPMC polymer mixture. Eur J Pharm Biopharm, 67:202–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macleod GS, Fell JT, Collett JH. (1997). Studies on the physical properties of mixed pectin/ethylcellulose films intended for colonic drug delivery. Int J Pharm, 157:53–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wakerly Z, Fell JT, Attwood D, Parkins D. (1997). Studies on drug release from pectin/ethylcellulose film-coated tablets: A potential colonic delivery system. Int J Pharm, 153:219–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semdé R, Amighi K, Devleeschouwer MJ, Moës AJ. (2000). Effect of pectinolytic enzymes on the theophylline release from pellets coated with water insoluble polymers containing pectin HM or calcium pectinate. Int J Pharm, 197:169–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semdé R, Amighi K, Devleeschouwer MJ, Moës AJ. (2000). Studies of pectin HM/Eudragit® RL/Eudragit® NE film-coating formulations intended for colonic drug delivery. Int J Pharm, 197:181–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voegele D, Brockmeier D, von Hattingberg HM. . (1988). Modelling of input function of drug absorption by moments. Proceedings of the symposium on compartmental and noncompartmental modelling in pharmacokinetics, Smolenice, Czechoslovakia, September 12–16.
   Google Scholar
• Porter SC. (1989). Controlled-release film coatings based on ethylcellulose. Drug Dev Ind Pharm, 15:1495–521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyer U, Hong W-H, Das N, Ghebre-Sellasie I. (1990). Comparative evaluation of three organic solvent and dispersion based ethylcellulose coating formulations. Pharm Technol, 14:68–86.
   Google Scholar
• Parikh NH, Porter SC, Rohera B. (1993). Aqueous ethylcellulose dispersion of ethylcellulose. I. Evaluation of coating process variables. Pharm Res, 10:525–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis SS, Hardy JG, Fara JW. (1986). Transit of pharmaceutical dosage forms through the small intestine. Gut, 27:886–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy JG, Wilson CG, Wood E, Hay DJ. (1985). Drug delivery to the proximal colon. J Pharm Pharmacol, 37:874–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siew LF, Man S-M, Newton JM, Basit AW. (2004). Amylose formulations for drug delivery to the colon: A comparison of two fermentation models to assess colonic targeting performance in vitro. Int J Pharm, 273:129–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar