Surface responses and desirability functions to determine optimal granulation domains

References

• Gaillard C, Chulia D, Jeannin C, Ozil P, Paschos S. (1989). Granulation à l'aide d'un granulateur-séchoir à grande vitesse. Pharm Acta Helv, 64:168–76.
   Google Scholar
• André F, Bouiller B, Adams S, Bagnaro M, Becourt P, Guyot JC. (1990). Etude par plan d'expériences de l'influence de trois paramètres de fabrication sur la qualité de grains obtenus en Turbosphère. STP Pharma Sci, 6:723–7.
   Google Scholar
• Robin P, Lusicano LJ, Pearlswig DM. (1994). Rational for selection of a single-pot manufacturing process using microwave/vacuum drying. Pharm Technol, 5:28–36.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl H. (2000). Single-pot system for drying pharmaceutical granules. Pharm Technol Eur, 12:192–201.
   Google Scholar
• Giry K, Genty M, Viana M, Wüthrich P, Chulia D. (2006). Multiphase versus single pot granulation process: Influence of process and granulation parameters on granule properties. Drug Dev Ind Pharm, 32:509–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giry K, Viana M, Genty M, Louvet F, Wüthrich P, Chulia D. (2009). Comparison of single pot and multiphase equipment. Part 1: Effect of the high shear granulator on granule properties according to the drug substance and its concentration. Pharm Dev Technol, 14(2):138–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegedűs A, Pintye-Hódi K. (2007). Influence of the type of the high-shear granulator on the physico-chemical properties of granules. Chem Eng Process, 46:1012–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giry K, Viana M, Genty M, Louvet F, Wüthrich P, Chulia D. (2009). Comparison of single pot and multiphase equipment. Part 2: Effect of the drying process on granules manufactured in a single pot granulator and dried either in situ or in a fluid bed dryer. Pharm Dev Technol, 14(2):149–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegedűs A, Pintye-Hódi K. (2007). Comparison of the effects of different drying techniques on properties of granules and tablets made on a production scale. Int J Pharm, 330:99–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vojnovic D, Moneghini M, Rubessa F, Zanchetta A. (1993). Simultaneous optimization of several response variables in a granulation process. Drug Dev Ind Pharm, 19:1479–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wehrle P, Nobelis Ph, Cuine A, Stamm A. (1993). Response surface methodology: An interesting statistical tool for process optimization and validation: Example of wet granulation in a high-shear mixer. Drug Dev Ind Pharm, 19:1637–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipps DM, Sakr AM. (1994). Characterization of wet granulation process parameters using response surface methodology. 1. Top-spray fluidized bed. J Pharm Sci, 83:937–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogawa O, Kamijima T, Miyamoto Y, Miyajima M, Sato M, Takayama K, . (1994). A new attempt to solve the scale-up problem for granulation using response surface methodology. J Pharm Sci, 83:439–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vojnovic D, Chicco D, El Zenary H. (1996). Doehlert experimental design applied to optimization and quality control of a granulation process in a high shear mixer. Int J Pharm, 145:203–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz JB, O'Connor RE. (1997). Optimization techniques in pharmaceutical formulation and processing. In: Banker GS, Rhodes CT, eds. Modern pharmaceutics. 3rd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker, 727–52.
   Google Scholar
• Soyeux P, Delacourte A, Delie B, Lefevre P, Boniface B. (1998). Influence and optimisation of operating parameters with a new binder in wet granulation. I: Use in powder form. Eur J Pharm Biopharm, 46:95–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campisi B, Vojnovic D, Chicco D, Phan-Tan-Luu R. (1999). Melt granulation in a high shear mixer: Optimization of mixture and process variables using a combined experimental design. Chemom Intell Lab Syst, 48:59–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voinovich D, Moneghini M, Perissutti B, Franceschinis E. (2001). Melt pelletization in high shear mixer using a hydrophobic melt binder: Influence of some apparatus and process variables. Eur J Pharm Biopharm, 52:305–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devay A, Mayer K, Pal S, Antal IJ. (2006). Investigation on drug dissolution and particle characteristics of pellets related to manufacturing process variables of high shear granulation. J Biochem Biophys Methods, 69:197–205.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harrington J. (1965). The desirability function. Ind Qual Control, 21:494–8.
   Google Scholar
• Derringer R, Suich R. (1980). Simultaneous optimization of several response variables. J Qual Technol, 12:214–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterakis PC, Korakianiti PP, Dallas PP, Rekkas DM. (2002). Evaluation and simultaneous optimization of some pellets characteristics using a 33 factorial design and the desirability function. Int J Pharm, 248:51–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribardo C, Allen TT. (2003). An alternative desirability function for achieving ‘six sigma’ quality. Qual Reliab Eng Int, 19:227–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Réthy Z, Koczor Z, Erdélyi J. (2004). Handling contradictory requirement using desirability functions. Acta Polytech Hung, 1:5–12.
   Google Scholar
• International Conference on Harmonisation. (2006). Guidance for industry: Q8 Pharmaceutical Development, U.S. department of health and human services FDA, center for drug evaluation and research (CDER), center for biologics evaluation and research (CBER).
   Google Scholar
• Rowe RC, Sheskey PJ, Weller PJ. (2003). Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients. 4th ed. London: Pharmaceutical Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar V, Reus-Medina ML, Yang D. (2002). Preparation, characterisation and tableting properties of a new cellulose-based pharmaceutical aid. Int J Pharm, 235(2):129–40.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carr RL. (1965). Evaluating flow properties of solids. Chem Eng, 18:163–8.
   Google Scholar
• Fell JT, Newton JM. (1970). Determination of tablets strength by the diametral-compression test. J Pharm Sci, 59(5):688–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham JC, Sinka IC, Zavaliangos A. (2004). Analysis of tablet compaction. I. Characterization of mechanical behaviour of powder and powder/tooling friction. J Pharm Sci, 93(8):2022–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribet J (2003). Fonctionnalisation des excipients: application à la comprimabilité des celluloses et des saccharoses. Ph.D. thesis, Limoges: Université de Limoges, 236 p.
   Google Scholar
• Gibassier D, Sado P, Le Verge R, Devissaguet JPh. (1982). Test de dissolution et fonction de Weibull. Labo Pharm Probl Tech, 30(319):249–56.
   Google Scholar
• Costa P, Sousa Lobo JM. (2001). Modelling and comparison of dissolution profiles. Eur J Pharm Sci, 13(2):123–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doehlert DH. (1970). Uniform shell designs. J R Stat Soc, 19C:231–9.
   Google Scholar
• Louvet F, Delplanque L. (2005). Les plans d'expériences: une approche pragmatique et illustrée. France: Association Expérimentique.
   Google Scholar
• Authelin JR, Lepinasse G, Leprince-Ringuet J, Quessada V (1996). Phénomène d'attrition, d'amorphisation et de mécanochimie accompagnant le séchage agité sous vide des produits pharmaceutiques, 4ème journée de l'AFSIA, 4:73–96.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl H. (2004). Comparing different granulation techniques. Pharm Technol Eur, 11:23–33.
   Google Scholar