Preparation and evaluation of a novel gastric mucoadhesive sustained-release acyclovir microsphere

References

• Massimiliano G, Patrizia C, Maurizio R, Philip SB, Alan GEW, Mark ES, . (2007). Evaluation of a basic physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for simulating the first-time-in-animal study. Eur J Pharm Sci, 31:190–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suresh K, Ritesh J, Deep K, Sudharshan H, Ashim KM. (2008). Pharmacokinetics of amino acid ester prodrugs of acyclovir after oral administration: Interaction with the transporters on Caco-2 cells. Int J Pharm, 362:93–101.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tory P, Johnson RF, Melissa M, Timothy PB, Barry JM. (2007). Development of an aciclovir implant for the effective long-term control of herpes simplex virus type-1 infection in Vero cells and in experimentally infected SKH-1 mice. Int J Antimicro Ag, 30:428–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher C, Bean B. (1985). Evaluation of oral acyclovir therapy. Drug Intell Clin Pharm, 19:518–24.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zeljka P, Natasa SB, Jelena FG, Anita M, Ivan J. (2005). Development and in vitro evaluation of a liposomal vaginal delivery system for acyclovir. J Control Release, 106:34–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conti B, Bucolo C, Giannavola C, Puglisic G, Giunchedia P, Contea U. (1997). Biodegradable microspheres for the intravitreal administration of acyclovir: in vitro/in vivo evaluation. Eur J Pharm Sci, 5:287–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawa SL, Huang KJ, Chiang CH. (2000). Acyclovir-containing liposomes for potential ocular delivery corneal penetration and absorption. J Control Release, 63:135–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alsarra IA, Hamed AY, Mahrous GM, Maghraby GMEI, Al-Robayan AA, Alanazi FK. (2009). Mucoadhesive polymeric hydrogels for nasal delivery of acyclovir. Drug Dev Ind Pharm, 35:352–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao CGG, Motiwale AV, Satyanarayana D, Subrahmanyam EVS. (2004). Formulation of taste masked oral microsphere of quinine sulphate by complexation. Indian J Pharm Sci, 66: 329–31.
   Google Scholar
• Atyabi F, Sharma HL, Mohammad HAH, Fell JT. (1996). Controlled drug release from floating ion exchange resin beads. J Control Release, 42:25–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hideki I, Kazuhiro F, Moji CA, Yoshinobu F. (2001) Use of ion-exchange resins to prepare 100 µm-sized microspheres with prolonged drug-release by the Wurster process. Int J Pharm, 216:67–76.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Plaizier-Vercammen JA. (1992). Investigation of the bioavailability of codeine from a cation ion-exchange sulfonic acid 1. Effect of parameters. Int J Pharm, 85:45–50.
   Google Scholar
• Liu HF, Su XY,Li X, Zhao X, Zang L, Pan WS. (2006). Development of prolonged release microspheres of metformin hydrochloride using ion exchange resins. J Chin Pharm Sci, 15:155–61.
   Google Scholar
• Ceschel GC, Bergamante V, Calabrese V, Biserni S, Ronchi C, Fini A. (2006). Design and evaluation of controlled release mucoadhesive tablets containing chlorhexidine in vitro. Drug Dev Ind Pharm, 32:53–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu GW, Jun HW. (1998). Diffusion studies of methotrexate in Carbopol and Poloxamer gels. Int J Pharm, 160:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang XN, Chen J, Zhang Q. (2003). Study on the release of albendazole nanoparticles in vitro and its correlation with uptake in stomach and intestinal absorption kinetics in rats. Chin Pharm J, 38:932–5.
   Google Scholar
• Michel C, Aprahamian M, Defontaine L, Couvreur P, Damgé C. (1991). The effect of site of administration in the gastrointestinal tract on the absorption of insulin from nanocapsules in diabetic rats. J Pharm Pharmacol, 43:1–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akkaramongkolporn P, Ngawhirunpat T. (2003). Dual ambroxol and chlorpheniramine resinates as an alternative carrier in concurrent resinate administration. Phamazie, 58:195–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perumal D. (2001). Microencapsulation of ibuprofen and Eudragit®RS 100 by the emulsion solvent diffusion technique. Int J Pharm, 218:1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu J, Sun X, Zhang ZR. (2002). The investigation of bioadhesive property of Carbomer 934 by Gamma Camera in vivo. J Biomed Eng, 19:423–5.
   Google Scholar
• Jankowski A, Jankowska AL, Lamparczyk H. (1998). Determination and pharmacokinetics of acyclovir after ingestion of microsphere form. J Pharm Biomed Anal, 18:249–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grazia S, Md EA, Daniella W. (2004). Pharmacokinetics of acyclovir in rabbit skin after IV-bolus, ointment, and iontophoretic administrations. Int J Pharm, 274:201–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wagner JG, Nelson E. (1964). Kinetic analysis of blood levels and urinary excretion in the absorptive phase after single dose of drug. J Pharm Sci, 53:1292–1243.
   Google Scholar
• Liu HF, Zang L, Sun XY, Zhang S, Pan WS. (2005). Study on the basic physicochemical properties of the new excipient-sodium polystyrene sulfonate. Chin J New Drug, 14:1007–9.
   Google Scholar
• Akiyama Y, Nagahara N, Kashihara T, Hirai S, Toguchi H. (1995). In vitro and in vivo evaluation of mucoadhesive microspheres prepared for the gastrointestinal tract using polyglycerol esters of fatty acids and a poly(acrylic acid) derivative. Pharm Res, 12:397–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao HM, Xu L, Han F, Che X, Dong Y, Wei M, . (2008). A novel riboflavin gastro-mucoadhesive delivery system based on ion-exchange fiber. Int J Pharm, 364:21–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar