To determine the end point of wet granulation by measuring powder energies and thermal properties

References

• Miwa A, Yajima T, Itai S. (2000). Prediction of suitable amount of water addition for wet granulation. Int J Pharm, 195:81–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chirkot T. (2002). Scale-up and endpoint issues of pharmaceutical wet granulation in a V-type low shear granulator. Drug Dev Ind Pharm, 28:871–888.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao N, Augsburger LL. (2006). The influence of granulation on super disintegrant performance. Pharm Dev Technol, 11:47–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unvala H, Schwartz J, Schnaare R. (1988). The effect of the wet granulation process on drug dissolution. Drug Dev Ind Pharm, 14:1327–1349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrotra A, Chaudhuri B, Faqih A, Tomassone M, Muzzio F. (2009). A modeling approach for understanding effects of powder flow properties on tablet weight variability. Powder Technol, 188:295–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leuenberger H, Puchkov M, Krausbauer E, Betz G. (2009). Manufacturing pharmaceutical granules: Is the granulation end–point a myth? Powder Technol, 189:141–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Achanta AS. (1997). End point determination and its relevance to physicochemical characteristics of solid dosage forms. Drug Dev Ind Pharm, 23:539–546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiakura O, Yamada M, Hashimoto M, Ishimaru S, Takayama K, Nagai T. (1992). Effect of amount and composition of granulating solution on physical characteristics of tablets. Drug Dev Ind Pharm, 18:1099–1110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin M. (1992). Wet granulation: End-point determination and scale-up. In: Swarbrick J, Ed. Encyclopedia of pharmaceutical technology. New York (USA): Marcel dekker Inc, 4078–4098.
   Google Scholar
• Javadzadeh Y, Shariati H, Movahhed-Danesh E, Nokhodchi A. (2009). Effect of some commercial grades of microcrystalline cellulose on flowability, compressibility, and dissolution profile of piroxicam liquisolid compacts. Drug Dev Ind Pharm, 35:243–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aljaberi A, Chatterji A, Shah NH, Sandhu HK. (2009). Functional performance of silicified microcrystalline cellulose versus microcrystalline cellulose: A case study. Drug Dev Ind Pharm, 35:1066–1071.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mihranyan A, Llagostera AP, Karmhag R, Strømme M, Ek R. (2004). Moisture sorption by cellulose powders of varying crystallinity. Int J Pharm, 269:433–442.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pepin X, Blanchon S, Couarraze G. (2001). Power consumption profiles in high-shear wet granulation. I: Liquid distribution in relation to powder and binder properties. J Pharm Sci, 90:322–331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamble JF, Dennis AB, Tobyn M. (2009). Monitoring and end-point prediction of a small scale wet granulation process using acoustic emission. Pharm Dev Technol, 14:299–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kachrimanis K, Karamyan V, Malamataris S. (2003). Artificial neural networks (ANNs) and modeling of powder flow. Int J Pharm, 250:13–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otsuka M, Mouri Y, Matsuda Y. (2003). Chemometric evaluation of pharmaceutical properties of antipyrine granules by near-infrared spectroscopy. AAPS PharmSciTech, 4:E47.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Frake P, Grierson SM, Hempenstall JM, Rudd DR. (1997). Process control and end point determination of a fluid bed granulation by application of near infra red spectroscopy. Int J Pharm, 151:75–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navaneethan CV, Missaghi S, Fassihi R. (2005). Application of powder rheometer to determine powder flow properties and lubrication efficiency of pharmaceutical particulate systems. AAPS PharmSciTech, 6:E398–E404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman RE. (2004). Predicting flowability and characterizing powders. Pharm Technol Eur, 16:41–43.
   Google Scholar
• Staniforth JN, Baichwal AR, Hart JP, Heng WS. (1988). Effect of addition of water on the rheological and mechanical properties of microcrystalline cellulose. Int J Pharm, 41:231–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giry K, Viana M, Genty M, Wüthrich P, Chulia D. (2010). Surface responses and desirability functions to determine optimal granulation domains. Drug Dev Ind Pharm, 36:1016–1026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Léonard G, Bertrand F, Chaouki J, Gosselin PM. (2008). An experimental investigation of effusivity as an indicator of powder blend uniformity. Powder Technol, 181:149–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghorab MK, Chatlapalli R, Hasan S, Nagi A. (2007). Application of thermal effusivity as a process analytical technology tool for monitoring and control of the roller compaction process. AAPS PharmSciTech, 8:23.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Okoye P, Fariss G, Keintz R. (2006). Thermal effusivity and power consumption as PAT tools for monitoring granulation end point. Pharmaceut Tech [online]. Available at http://pharmtech.findpharma.com/pharmtech/Process+analytical+technology+(PAT)/Thermal-Effusivity-and-Power-Consumption-as-PAT-To/ArticleStandard/Article/detail/333033. Accessed on 20 May 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Roy Y, Closs S, Mathis N, Nieves E. (2004). Thermal effusivity as a process analytical technology to optimize, monitor and control fluid-bed drying. Pharm Technol, 28:21–28.
   Google Scholar
• Arnaud P, Brossard D, Chaumeil JC. (1998). Effect of the granulation process on nitrofurantoin granule characteristics. Drug Dev Ind Pharm, 24:57–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouwman AM, Henstra MJ, Westerman D, Chung JT, Zhang Z, Ingram A et al. (2005). The effect of the amount of binder liquid on the granulation mechanisms and structure of microcrystalline cellulose granules prepared by high shear granulation. Int J Pharm, 290:129–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz J. (1998). Granulation. Drug Dev Ind Pharm, 14:2071–2090.
   Google Scholar
• Luukkonen P, Maloney T, Rantanen J, Paulapuro H, Yliruusi J. (2001). Microcrystalline cellulose-water interaction–a novel approach using thermoporosimetry. Pharm Res, 18:1562–1569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckton G, Yonemochi E, Yoon WL, Moffat AC. (1999). Water sorption and near IR spectroscopy to study the differences between microcrystalline cellulose and silicified microcrystalline cellulose before and after wet granulation. Int J Pharm, 181:41–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavinato M, Massimo B, Marianna M, Bellazzi G, Canu A, Santomaso A. (2010). Formulation design for optimal high shear wet granulation using on-line torque measurements. Int J Pharm, 387:48–55.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar