Surelease as granulating liquid in preparation of sustained release matrices of ethylcellulose and theophylline

References

• Santla M, Ilic I, Vrecer F, Baumgartner S. A compressibility and compactibility study of real tableting mixtures: the impact of wet and dry granulation versus a direct tableting mixture. Int J Pharm 2011;414:131–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aulton ME, Summers M. Powders, granules and granulation. In: Aulton ME, Tylor KMG, eds. Aulton’s pharmaceutics the design and manufacture of medicines. Churchill Livingstone: Elsevier; 2013:465–86
   Google Scholar
• Block LC, Schmeling LO, Couto AG, et al. Effect of binders on 500 mg metformin hydrochloride tablets produced by wet granulation. Rev Ciênc Farm Básica Apl 2009;30:145–52
   Google Scholar
• Porter SC, Felton LA. Techniques to assess film coatings and evaluate film-coated products. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2010;36:128–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agrawal AM, Neau SH, Bonate PL. Wet granulation fine particle ethylcellulose tablets: effect of production variables and mathematical modeling of drug release. AAPS Pharm Sci 2003;5:1–13
   Google Scholar
• Nova MV, Goncalves MCP, Nogueira AC, et al. Formulation and characterization of ethylcellulose microparticles containing l-alanyl-l -glutamine peptide. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2014;40:1308–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mughal MA, Saripella KK, Kouba C, et al. Coated hydralazine hydrochloride beads for sustained release after oral administration. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2013;39:1439–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Francisco LMB, Cerquetani JA, Bruschi ML. Development and characterization of gelatin and ethylcellulose microparticles designed as platforms to delivery fluoride. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2013;39:1644–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos JV, Pina MET, Marques MPM, Batista de Carvalho LAE. New sustained release of zidovudine matrix tablet- cytotoxicity toward Caco-2 cells. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2013;39:1154–66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez-Lafuente C, Faucci MT, Fernandez-Arevalo M, et al. Development of sustained release matrix tablets of didanosine containing methacrylic and ethylcellulose polymers. Int J Pharm 2002;234:213–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dabbagh MA, Ford JL, Rubinstein MH, Hogan JE. Effects of polymer particle size, compaction pressure and hydrophilic polymers on drug release from matrices containing ethylcellulose. Int J Pharm 1996;140:85–95
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConnell EL, Tutas J, Mohamed MAM, et al. Colonic drug delivery using amylose films: the role of aqueous ethylcellulose dispersions in controlling drug release. Cellulose 2007;14:25–34
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadeghi F, Ford JL, Rajabi-Siahboomi A. The influence of drug type on the release profiles from Surelease-coated pellets. Int J Pharm 2003;254:123–35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reyes G, Deng H, Rajabi-Siahboomi AR. Application of ethylcellulose in preparation of extended release theophylline inert matrix tablets by wet granulation. AAPS Annual Meeting and Exposition; 2008; Atlanta, GA
   Google Scholar
• Khan GM, Zhu JB. Ibuprofen release kinetics from controlled-release tablets granulated with aqueous polymeric dispersion of ethylcellulose II: influence of several parameters and coexcipients. J Control Release 1998;56:127–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz NR, Ghaly ES. Mechanisms of drug release from matrices prepared with aqueous dispersion of ethylcellulose. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 1997;23:113–17
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahashi YI, Watanabe N, Sasatsu M, Onishi H. Formulation and evaluation of matrix type mucoadhesive tablets aimed at treating oral aphta. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2013;39:1254–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaibva FA, Walker RB. The use of response surface methodology for the formulation and optimization of salbutamol sulfate hydrophilic matrix sustained release tablets. Pharm Dev Technol 2012;17:594–606
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr RL. Evaluating flow properties of solids. Chem Eng 1965;72:163–8
   Google Scholar
• Cao QR, Choi YW, CuP JH, Lee BJ. Effect of solvents on physical properties and release characteristics of monolithic hydroxypropylmethylcellulose matrix granules and tablets. Arch Pharm Res 2005;28:493–501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mascia S, Seiler C, Fitzpatrick S, Wilson DI. Extrusion–spheronisation of microcrystalline cellulose pastes using a non-aqueous liquid binder. Int J Pharm 2010;389:1–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu J, Ho H, Sheu M. Influence of wet granulation and lubrication on the powder and tableting properties of codried product of microcrystalline cellulose with B-cyclodextrin. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2001;51:63–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darunkaisorn W, Mahadlek J, Phaechamud T. HPMC matrix granule formation: selection of suitable granulating fluid. Thai Pharm Health Sci J 2009;4:29–45
   Google Scholar
• Nokhodchi A, Aliakbar R, Desai S, Javadzadeh Y. Liquisolid compacts: the effect of cosolvent and HPMC on theophylline release. Colloid Surf B 2010;79:262–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katikaneni PR, Upadrashta SM, Rowlings CE, et al. Consolidation of ethyl-cellulose: effect of particle size, press speed and lubricants. Int J Pharm 1995;117:13–21
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Zoubi N Alkhatib HS, Bustanji Y, et al. Sustained-release of buspiron HCl by co spray-drying with aqueous polymeric dispersions. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2008;69:735–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel Krunal M. Design development and evaluation of modified release tablet of montelukast sodium using ethylcellulose and tragacanth. Int Res J Pharm 2011;2:175–8
   Google Scholar