112
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL ARTICLECausation and Prevention

Prospective Study on Combination of Electrical Impedance Scanning and Ultrasound in Estimating Risk of Development of Breast Cancer in Young Women

, , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 295-303 | Published online: 26 Oct 2009

REFERENCES

  • Boring, C.C.; Squires, T.S.; Tong, T. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 1994, 44, 7–26.
  • Zou, Y.; Guo, Z. A review of electrical impedance techniques for breast cancer detection. Medical Engineering & Physics 2003, 25, 79–90.
  • Shannon, C.; Smith, I.E. Breast cancer in adolescents and young women. Eur J Cancer 2003, 39(18), 2632–2642.
  • Sundquist, M.; Thorstenson, S.; Brudin, L.; Wingren, S.; Nordenskjold, B. Incidence and prognosis in early onset breast cancer. Breast 2002, 11(1), 30–35.
  • Elmore, J.; Barton, M.; Moceri, V.; Polk, S.; Arena, P.J.; Fletcher, S.W. Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammography and clinical breast examinations. New Engl J Med 1998, 338, 1089–96.
  • Burns, R.P. Image guided breast biopsy. Am J Surg 1997, 73, 9–11.
  • Committee on New Approaches to Early Detection and Diagnosis of Breast Cancer. Saving women’s lives strategies for improving breast cancer detection and diagnosis. In: Joy, J.E; Penhoet, E. E; Petitti, D.B. ( eds.) Institute of Medicine and National Research Council of the National Academies. National Academy Press, Washington DC, 2004.
  • Meng, J.; Zhang, J. Clinical analysis for young female patients with breast cancer. Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2006, 33(26), 1316–1320.
  • Wang, Y.; Guang-wei, X. Secondary prevention of breast cancer. Chinese Journal of Prevention and Control of Chronic Non-communicable Diseases 1994, 2(2), 84–86.
  • Edell, S.L.; Eisen, M.D. Current imaging modalities for the diagnosis of breast cancer. Del Med J 1999, 71, 377–82.
  • Kriege, M.; Brekelmans, C.T.; Boetes, C. Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. N Engl J Med 2004, 351(5), 427–437.
  • Fricke, H.; Morse, S. The electric capacity of tumors of the breast. J Cancer Res 1926, 16, 310–376.
  • Singh, B.; Smith, C.W.; Hughes, R. In vivo dielectric spectrometer. Med Biol Eng Comput 1979, 17, 45–60.
  • Morimoto, T.; Kinouchi, Y.; Iritani, T.; Kimura, S.; Measurement of the electrical bio-impedance of breast tumors. Eur Surg Res 1990, 22, 86–92.
  • Blady, B.; Baldetorp, B. Impedance spectra of tumour tissue in comparison with normal tissue: A possible clinical application for electrical impedance tomography. Physiol. Meas 1996, 17, A105–A115.
  • Joissinet, J. The impedivity of freshly excised human breast tissue. Physiol Meas 1998, 19, 61–75.
  • Cuzick, J.; Holland, R.; Barth, V.; Davies, R.; Faupel, M.; Fentiman, I.; Frischbier, H.J.; LaMarque, J.L.; Merson, M.; Sacchini, V.; Vanel, D.; Veronesi, U. Electropotential measurements as a new diagnostic modality for breast cancer. Lancet 1998, 352(9125), 359–363.
  • Jossinety, J. The impedivity of freshly excised human breast tissue. Physiol. Meas 1998, 19, 61–75.
  • Chauveau, N.; Hamzaoui, L.; Rochaix, P.; Rigaud, B.; Voigt, J.J.; Morucci, J.P. Ex vivo discrimination between normal and pathological tissues in human breast surgical biopsies using bioimpedance spectroscopy. Ann NY Acad Sci 1999, 873, 42–50.
  • Scholz, B.; Anderson, R. On electrical impedance scanning—Principles and simulations. Electromedica 2000, 68, 35–44.
  • Perlet, C.; Kessler, M.; Lenington, S.; Sittek, H.; Reiser, M. Electrical impedance measurements of the breast: Effect of hormonal changes associated with the menstrual cycle. Eur Radiol 2000, 10, 1550–1554.
  • Skourou, C.; Rohr, A.; Hoopes, P.J.; Paulsen, P.D. In vivo EIS characterization of tumour tissue properties is dominated by excess extracellular fluid. Phys Med Biol 2007, 52, 347–363.
  • FDA. 1999. Available from: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfTopic/pma/pma.cfm?num=p97003(2008-05-04).
  • Malich, A.; Fritsch, T.; Anderson, R.; Electrical impedance scanning for classifying suspicious breast lesions: First results. Eur Radiol 2000, 10(10), 1555–1561.
  • Malich, A.; Boehm, T.; Facius, M. Differentiation of mammographically suspicious lesions: Evaluation of breast ultrasound, MRI mammography and electrical impedance scanning as adjunctive technologies in breast cancer detection. Clin Radiol 2001, 56, 278–283.
  • Malich, A.; Boehm, T.; Facius, M.; Freessmeyer, M.; Fleck, M.; Anderson, R.; Kaiser, W.A. Additional value of electrical impedance scanning: Experience of 240 histologically proven breast lesions. European Journal of Cancer 2001, 37, 2324–2330.
  • Glickman, Y.A.; Filo, O.; Nachaliel, U.; Lenington, S.; Amin-Spector, S.; Ginor, R. Novel EIS postprocessing algorithm for breast cancer diagnosis. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2002, 21, 710–712.
  • Facius, M.; Malich, A.; Schneider, G.; Boehm, T.; Anderson, R.; Kaiser, W.A. Electrical impedance scanning used in addition to ultrasound for the verification of submandibular and parotid lesions: Initial results. Invest Radiol 2002, 37(8), 421–427.
  • Stojadinovic, A.; Nissan, A.; Gallimidi, Z.; Lenington, S.; Logan, W.; Zuley, M.; Yeshaya, A.; Shimonov, M.; Melloul, M.; Fields, S.; Allweis, T.; Ginor, R.; Gur, D.; Shriver, C.D. Electrical impedance scanning for the early detection of breast cancer in young women Preliminary results of a multicenter prospective clinical trial. J Clin Oncol 2005, 23(12), 2703–15.
  • Stojadinovic, A.; Henry, L.R.; Peoples, G.E.; Mittendorf, E.A.; Lenington, S.; Nissan, A.; Shriver, C.D. Satisfaction with breast cancer screening and future screening participation. Med Sci Monit 2007, 13(10), 422–429.
  • Ji, Z.-Y.; Fu, F.; You, F.-S.; Shi, X.-T.; Liu, R.-G.; Dong, X.-Z.; Wang, K. Preliminary experiment on electrical impedance scanning breast imaging system. J Fourth Mil Med Univ 2004, 25(21), 2000–2003.
  • Liu, R.; Fu, F.; Shi, X.-T.; You, F.-S.; Ji, Z.-Y.; Dong, X.-Z. Preliminary data analysis of electrical impedance scanning of breasts in normal women. J Fourth Mil Med Univ 2004, 25(21), 1994–1999.
  • Wang, K.; Dong, X.-Z.; Fu, F.; Liu, R.-G.; Shi, X.-T.; You, F.-F.; Qi, J.-X.; Ji, Z.-Y. The design and realization of clinical data management system for galactophore EIS. Chinese Medical Equipment Journal 2005, 26(2), 11–12.
  • Yue, J.; Zhou, X.-D.; Fu, F.; Dong, X.-Z.; Zheng, Y.; Guo, Q.-X.; Zhang, O. Electrical impedance scanning and high frequency ultrasonography for diagnosis of small breast cancers. J Fourth Mil Med Univ 2005, 26(14), 1333–1334.
  • Liu, R.-G.; Dong, X.-Z.; Fu, F.; You, F.-S.; Shi, X.-T.; Ji, Y.-J. The software design of a new breast tumor detector based on electrical impedance scanning. Chinese Medical Equipment Journal 2005, 26(4), 5,8
  • Ji, Z.-Y.; Fu, F.; Shi, X.-T.; Liu, R.-G.; Dong, X.-Z.; You, F.-S.; Wang, K. A simulation study of electrical impedance Scan-imaging based on a phantom. Space Medicine& Medical Engineering 2005, 18(2), 130–134.
  • Liu, R.; Fu, F.; Shi, X.; You, F.; Ji, Z.; Dong, X. Frequency characteristic of diseased breast tissues detected by electrical impedance scanning. Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi 2005, 22(6), 1090–1094.
  • Liu, R.; Dong, X; Fu, F.; You, F.; Shi, X.; Ji, Z.; Wang, K. Multi-frequency parameter mapping of electrical impedance scanning using two kinds of circuit model. Physiol Meas 2007, 28(7), 85–100.
  • SFDA. 2005. Available from: http://app1.sfda.gov.cn/datasearch/face3/base.jsp?tableId=26tableName=TABLE26title=nativeapp-liance&bcId=118103058617027083838706701567.
  • Sandra L. Hagen-Ansert Textbook of diagnostic ultrasonography: volume 1,. 5th ed. Mosby Yearbook, 2002, 379–382.
  • MacKarem, G. 2001, The effectiveness of the Gail model in estimating risk for development of breast cancer in women under 40 years of age. Breast J 2001). 7(1), 34–39.
  • Wersebe, A.; Siegmann, K.; Krainick, U.; Fersis, N.; Vogel, U.; Claussen, C.D.; Mueller-Schimpfe, M. Diagnostic potential of targeted electrical impedance scanning in classifying suspicious breast lesions. Investigat. Radiol 2002, 37, 65–72.
  • Fuchsjaeger, M.; Diebold, T.; Szabo, B.; Malich, A.; Kaiser, W.; Bone, B.; Vogel, T.J.; Helbich, T. Adjunctive use of electrical impedance scanning (EIS) new software algorithm to differentiate breast lesions in comparison to histopathology: European Mmulticentre study, presented at the ECR Vienna 2002, Vienna, Austria, Mar. 2002, Presentation B-0649.
  • Malich, A.; Boehm, T; Facius, M.; Freesmeyer, M.G.; Fleck, M.; Anderson, R.; Kaiser, W. A Electrical impedance scanning as a new imaging modality in breast cancer detection—A short review of clinical value on breast application, limitations and perspectives. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research 2003, A497, 75–81.
  • Malich, A.; Boehm, T.; Facius, M.; Freesmeyer, M.G.; Fleck, M.; Anderson, R.; Kaiser, W. A Influence of size and depth on accuracy of electrical impedance scanning. Eur Radiol 2003, 13, 2441–2446.
  • Fuchsjaeger, M.H.; Flöry, D.; Reiner, C.S.; Rudas, M.; Riedl, C.C.; Helbich, T.H. The negative predictive value of electrical impedance scanning in BI-RADS category IV breast lesions. Invest Radiol 2005 Jul, 40(7), 478–85.
  • Diebold, T.; Jacobi, V.; Scholz, B.; Hensel, C.; Solbach, C.; Kaufmann, M.; Viana, F.; Balzer, J.; Peters, J.; Vogl, T. Value of electrical impedance scanning (EIS) in the evaluation of BI-RADS III/IV/V-lesions. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2005, 4(1), 93–97.
  • Stojadinovic, A.; Moskovitz, O.; Gallimidi, Z.; Fields, S.; Brooks, A.D.; Brem, R.; Mucciola, R.N.; Singh, M.; Maniscalco-Theberge, M.; Rockette, H.E.; Gur, D.; Shriver, C.D. Prospective study of electrical impedance scanning for identifying young women at risk for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2006 May, 97(2), 179–89.
  • Stojadinovic, A.; Nissan, A.; Shriver, C.D.; Mittendorf, E.A.; Akin, M.D.; Dickerson, V.; Lenington, S.; Platt, L.D.; Stavros, T.; Goldstein, S.R.; Moskovitz, O.; Gallimidi, Z.; Fields, S.I.; Yeshaya, A.; Allweis, T.M.; Manassa, R.; Pappo, I.; Ginor, R.X.; D’Agostino, R.B.; Gur, D. Electrical impedance scanning as a new breast cancer risk stratification tool for young women. J Surg Oncol 2008 Feb, 1,97(2), 112–120.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.