Development and Validation of the System of Quality of Life Instruments for Cancer Patients: Colorectal Cancer (QLICP-CR)

REFERENCES

• Shike M, Winawer SJ, Greenwald PH, Bloch A, Hill MJ, Swaroop SV. Primary prevention of colorectal cancer. the WHO collaborating centre for the prevention of colorectal cancer. Bull World Health Organ 1990;68(3):377–385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 2005;55(2):74–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotonda C, Conroy T, Mercier M, Bonnetain F, Uwer L, Miny J. Validation of the French version of the colorectal-specific quality-of-life questionnaires EORTC QLQ-CR38 and FACT-C. Qual Life Res 2008;17(3):437–445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures 2012. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle P, Langman JS. ABC of colorectal cancer: epidemiology. BMJ 2000;321(7264):805–808.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law CC, Tak Lam WW, Fu YT, Wong KH, Sprangers MA, Fielding R. Validation of the Chinese version of the EORTC colorectal cancer-specific quality-of-life questionnaire module (QLQ-CR38). J Pain Symptom Manage 2008;35(2):203–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoo HJ, Kim JC, Eremenco S, Han OS. Quality of life in colorectal cancer patients with colectomy and validation of functional assessment of cancer therapy –colorectal (FACT-C), version 4. J Pain Symptom Manage 2005;30(1):24–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprangers MA, te Velde A, Aaronson NK. The construction and testing of the EORTC colorectal cancer-specific quality of life questionnaire module (QLQ-CR38). European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Study Group on Quality of Life. Eur J Cancer 1999;35(2):238–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Z, Lu YB, Li YF, Wan CH, Luo JH, Meng Q. Evaluation of the functional assessment of cancer therapy –Colorectal FACT-C(V4.0) in Chinese version. J Clin Rehabil Tiss Eng Res 2007;11(43):8753–8756.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang D, Yang Z, Wan CH, Lu YB, Li YF, Cun YL, Meng Q. Development and evaluation of Chinese version of QLQ-CR68 of quality of life instrument in patients with colorectal cancer. China Cancer 2007;16(11):862–865.
   Google Scholar
• Sprangers MA, Cull A, Groenvold M, Bjordal K, Blazeby J, Aaronson NK. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer approach to developing questionnaire modules: an update and overview. Qual Life Res 1998;7(4):291–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cella D, Nowinski CJ. Measuring quality of life in chronic illness: the functional assessment of chronic illness therapy measurement system. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83(12, Suppl 2):S10–S17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan CH, Yang Z, Meng Q, Feng CY, Wang HY, Tang XL. Development and validation of the general module of the system of quality of life instruments for cancer patients (QLICP-GM). Int J Cancer 2008;122(1):190–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan CH, Lu YB, Tang W, Tu X, Zhang CZ, Li GF. Development and validation of the system of quality of life instruments for cancer patients: lung cancer (QLICP-LU). Lung Cancer 2008;60(1):105–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan CH, Yang Z, Tang XL, Zou TN, Chen DD, Zhang DM. Development and validation of the system of quality of life instruments for cancer patients: breast cancer (QLICP-BR). Support Care Cancer 2009;17(4):359–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart AL, Hays RD, Ware JE Jr. The MOS short-form general health survey. Reliability and validity in a patient population. Med Care 1988;26:724–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez R, Ballesteros M, Arnold BJ. Validation of the FACT-G scale for evaluating quality of life in cancer patients in Colombia. Qual Life Res 2011;20(1):19–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan CH, Meng Q, Yang Z, Tu X, Feng CY, Tang XL. Validation of the simplified Chinese version of EORTC QLQ-C30 from the measurements of five types of in-patients with cancer. Ann Oncol 2008;19(12):2053–2060.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hays RD, Hayashi T. Beyond internal consistency reliability: rationale and user's guide for multi-trait analysis program on the microcomputer. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 1990;22:167–175.
   Google Scholar
• McGraw KO, Wong SP. Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychol Methods 1996;1(1):30–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuck P. Assessing reproducibility for interval data in health-related quality of life questionnaires: which coefficient should be used? Qual Life Res 2004;13:571–586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terwee CB, Dekker FW, Wiersinga WM, Prummel MF, Bossuyt PM. On assessing responsiveness of health-related quality of life instruments: guidelines for instrument evaluation. Qual Life Res 2003;12(4):349–363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husted JA, Cook RJ, Farewell VT, Gladman DD. Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol 2000;53(5):459–468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The WHOQOL Group. The Word Health Organization Quality of Life assessment (WHOQOL): devolvement and psychometric properties. Soc Sci Med 1998;46(12):1569–1585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li L, Wang HM, Shen Y. Chinese SF-36 health survey: translation, cultural adaptation, validation and normalization. J Epidemiol Community Health 2003;57:259–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjermsted MJ, Fossa SD, Bjordal K, Kaasa S. Test–retest study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality-of-Life questionnaire. J Clin Oncol 1995;13:1249–1254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward WL, Hahn EA, Mo F, Hernandez L, Tulsky DS, Cella D. Reliability and validity of the functional assessment of cancer therapy –colorectal (FACT-C) quality of life instrument. Qual Life Res 1999;8(3):181–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar